Abstract:Background Endoscopic sphincterotomy (EST) is the most frequently used technique for removal of stones from the bile duct. In recent years, endoscopic papillary large balloon dilation (EPLBD) has been shown to be a safe and effective technique for the removal of large or difficult common bile duct stones. However, comparison of EPLBD and EST for effectiveness in bile duct stone removal has given inconsistent results. The present meta-analysis was carried out to compare the effect of EPLBD and EST in retrieval of choledocholithiasis. Methods A literature search was performed using Medline, PubMed, EMBase and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) for relevant articles published in English. A meta-analysis was performed on the retrieved studies. Results Seven randomized controlled trials and 790 patients were involved. EPLBD compared with EST resulted in similar outcomes for overall successful clearance rates of bile duct stones (97.35 vs. 96.35%, OR 1.28, 95% CI 0.58–2.82, P = 0.54), stone clearance in the first ERCP session (87.87 vs. 84.15%, OR 1.31, 95% CI 0.81–2.11, P = 0.21) and removal of large sized stones (OR 1.08, 95% CI 0.21–5.64, P = 0.49). EPLBD performed with either a short or a long ballooning time did not increase the bile duct stone clearance rate. EPLBD decreased overall usage of mechanical lithotripsy in the bile duct stone removal process (OR 0.51, 95% CI 0.30–0.86, P = 0.01). However, no significant difference was found between EPLBD and EST in the use of mechanical lithotripsy for the removal of large sized stones (OR 0.67, 95% CI 0.34–1.28, P = 0.22). Compared with EST, EPLBD did not show a short ERCP duration (WMD −0.75, 95% CI −1.57 to 0.08, P = 0.08). EPLBD was associated with fewer overall complications than EST (5.8 vs. 13.1%, OR 0.41, 95% CI 0.24–0.68, P = 0.0007). Hemorrhage occurred less frequently with EPLBD than with EST (OR 0.15, 95% CI 0.04–0.50, P = 0.002). There was no significant difference in post-ERCP pancreatitis, perforation and cholangitis. Conclusions EPLBD is an effective and safe method for the removal of large or difficult common bile stones. EPLBD should be considered as an alternative to EST for patients in whom EST could not be routinely performed. Based on EPLBD causing fewer cases of hemorrhaging, EPLBD is also recommended for removal of large or difficult common bile duct stones in patients with an underlying coagulopathy or need for anticoagulation following ERCP. The long-term prognosis of EPLBD need to be further investigated.

Minor Endoscopic Sphincterotomy Followed by Large Balloon Dilation for Large Choledocholith Treatment

The comparative analysis between two methods for minimally invasive surgery in the treatment of cholecystolithiasis and choledocholithiasis

Intraoperative ERCP and endoscopic sphincterotomy combined with laparoscopic cholecystectomy for treatment of cholelithiasis with choledocholithiasis

Comparison of endoscopic papillary large balloon dilation and endoscopic sphincterotomy for retrieval of choledocholithiasis: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

Long-term outcomes of endoscopic papillary large-balloon dilation (12–15 mm) with or without limited sphincterotomy for removal of bile duct stones

Endoscopic Sphincterotomy or Papillary Balloon Dilatation for Choledocholithiasis.

Short- and long-term outcomes of endoscopic papillary large balloon dilation with or without sphincterotomy for removal of large bile duct stones

Comparison between endoscopic sphincterotomy combined with large-balloon dilation and endoscopic large-balloon dilation alone in removal of large bile duct stones

Sa1531 Endoscopic Papillary Large Balloon Dilation or Endoscopic Sphincterotomy in Extraction of Large Common Bile Duct Stones: Optimal Management Strategy Using Decision Analysis Techniques

Is endoscopic sphincterotomy plus large-balloon dilation a better option than endoscopic large-balloon dilation alone in removal of large bile duct stones? A retrospective comparison study.

Dilation Time in Endoscopic Papillary Balloon Dilation for Common Bile Duct Stones.

Adding Balloon Sphincteroplasty to Sphincterotomy in Endoscopic Removal of Large Bile Duct Stones - A Randomized Controlled Trial

Endoscopic sphincterotomy with balloon dilatation versus sphincterotomy alone for common bile duct stones removal: a randomised controlled trial

Treatment choice for common bile duct stone in laparoscopic era: LCBDE or EST

Ampulla dilation with different sized balloons to remove common bile duct stones

Optimal dilation duration of 10 mm diameter balloons after limited endoscopic sphincterotomy for common bile duct stones: a randomized controlled trial

Clinical analysis of endoscopic sphincterotomy for choledocholithiasis

Clinical efficacy of laparoscopic cholecystectomy combined with endoscopic papillary balloon dilation in treatment of gallbladder stones with common bile duct stones: A retrospective study

Endoscopic Sphincterotomy Plus Balloon Dilation Versus Endoscopic Sphincterotomy for Choledocholithiasis: A Meta‐analysis

Application of Endoscopic Papillary Balloon Dilation for Treatment of Common Bile Duct Stones

Percutaneous Transhepatic Papillary Balloon Dilation versus Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography for Common Bile Duct Stones: A Multicenter Prospective Study