Abstract:Background Endoscopic sphincterotomy (EST) is the most frequently used technique for removal of stones from the bile duct. In recent years, endoscopic papillary large balloon dilation (EPLBD) has been shown to be a safe and effective technique for the removal of large or difficult common bile duct stones. However, comparison of EPLBD and EST for effectiveness in bile duct stone removal has given inconsistent results. The present meta-analysis was carried out to compare the effect of EPLBD and EST in retrieval of choledocholithiasis. Methods A literature search was performed using Medline, PubMed, EMBase and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) for relevant articles published in English. A meta-analysis was performed on the retrieved studies. Results Seven randomized controlled trials and 790 patients were involved. EPLBD compared with EST resulted in similar outcomes for overall successful clearance rates of bile duct stones (97.35 vs. 96.35%, OR 1.28, 95% CI 0.58–2.82, P = 0.54), stone clearance in the first ERCP session (87.87 vs. 84.15%, OR 1.31, 95% CI 0.81–2.11, P = 0.21) and removal of large sized stones (OR 1.08, 95% CI 0.21–5.64, P = 0.49). EPLBD performed with either a short or a long ballooning time did not increase the bile duct stone clearance rate. EPLBD decreased overall usage of mechanical lithotripsy in the bile duct stone removal process (OR 0.51, 95% CI 0.30–0.86, P = 0.01). However, no significant difference was found between EPLBD and EST in the use of mechanical lithotripsy for the removal of large sized stones (OR 0.67, 95% CI 0.34–1.28, P = 0.22). Compared with EST, EPLBD did not show a short ERCP duration (WMD −0.75, 95% CI −1.57 to 0.08, P = 0.08). EPLBD was associated with fewer overall complications than EST (5.8 vs. 13.1%, OR 0.41, 95% CI 0.24–0.68, P = 0.0007). Hemorrhage occurred less frequently with EPLBD than with EST (OR 0.15, 95% CI 0.04–0.50, P = 0.002). There was no significant difference in post-ERCP pancreatitis, perforation and cholangitis. Conclusions EPLBD is an effective and safe method for the removal of large or difficult common bile stones. EPLBD should be considered as an alternative to EST for patients in whom EST could not be routinely performed. Based on EPLBD causing fewer cases of hemorrhaging, EPLBD is also recommended for removal of large or difficult common bile duct stones in patients with an underlying coagulopathy or need for anticoagulation following ERCP. The long-term prognosis of EPLBD need to be further investigated.

Application of Endoscopic Papillary Balloon Dilation for Treatment of Common Bile Duct Stones

The comparative analysis between two methods for minimally invasive surgery in the treatment of cholecystolithiasis and choledocholithiasis

Comparison of endoscopic papillary large balloon dilation and endoscopic sphincterotomy for retrieval of choledocholithiasis: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

Dilation Time in Endoscopic Papillary Balloon Dilation for Common Bile Duct Stones.

Endoscopic Sphincterotomy or Papillary Balloon Dilatation for Choledocholithiasis.

Sa1531 Endoscopic Papillary Large Balloon Dilation or Endoscopic Sphincterotomy in Extraction of Large Common Bile Duct Stones: Optimal Management Strategy Using Decision Analysis Techniques

Recent advances in endoscopic management of difficult bile duct stones

Clinical Application of Endoscopy for Choledocholithiasis

Comparison between endoscopic sphincterotomy combined with large-balloon dilation and endoscopic large-balloon dilation alone in removal of large bile duct stones

Adding Balloon Sphincteroplasty to Sphincterotomy in Endoscopic Removal of Large Bile Duct Stones - A Randomized Controlled Trial

Endoscopic extraction of large common bile duct stones: A review article

Su1639 Is Endoscopic Sphincterotomy Plus Large-Balloon Dilation a Better Option Than Endoscopic Large-Balloon Dilation Alone in Removal of Large Bile Duct Stones? a Retrospective Comparison Study

Is endoscopic sphincterotomy plus large-balloon dilation a better option than endoscopic large-balloon dilation alone in removal of large bile duct stones? A retrospective comparison study.

Percutaneous Transhepatic Papillary Balloon Dilation versus Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography for Common Bile Duct Stones: A Multicenter Prospective Study

Is Endoscopic Balloon Dilation Still Associated With Higher Rates of Pancreatitis?: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Short- and long-term outcomes of endoscopic papillary large balloon dilation with or without sphincterotomy for removal of large bile duct stones

Effect of endoscopic sphincterotomy and endoscopic papillary balloon dilation endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatographies on the sphincter of Oddi

Ampulla dilation with different sized balloons to remove common bile duct stones

THE ASSESSMENT OF CLINICAL EFFICIENCY OF REMOVING HUGE COMMON BILE DUCT STONES BY ENDOSCOPY

Endoscopic Sphincterotomy Plus Balloon Dilation Versus Endoscopic Sphincterotomy for Choledocholithiasis: A Meta‐analysis

Optimal dilation duration of 10 mm diameter balloons after limited endoscopic sphincterotomy for common bile duct stones: a randomized controlled trial