Differences in Sensory Reweighting Due to Loss of Visual and Proprioceptive Cues in Postural Stability Support among Sleep-Deprived Cadet Pilots.

Shan Chen,Jin Ma,Jicheng Sun,Jian Wang,Xiao,Yihan Wang,Wendong Hu
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gaitpost.2018.04.037
IF: 2.746
2018-01-01
Gait & Posture
Abstract:Background: Sleep deprivation is known to diminish postural control. Research question: We investigated whether sleep deprivation affects sensory reweighting for postural control due to loss of visual and proprioceptive cues. Methods: Two cohorts of cadet pilots were deprived of sleep for 40 h. Variabilty in force-platform center of pressure was analyzed based on the whole path length (WPL); circumference area (CA); mean of displacement along x and y axes and corresponding standard deviations (SDx, SDy); and frequency of body-sway intensity, all of which were recorded while the cadets stood with eyes open (NEO), eyes closed (NEC), and eyes closed on a foam platform base (FEC) A sleepiness index (SUBI) based on principal component analysis of selected Cohort 1 data (n = 37) was used to compare Cohort 2 data (n = 29) with scores for the Stanford Sleepiness Scale (SSS) and Pittsburg Sleep Quality Index (PSQI). Results: Balance began to deteriorate at 16 h for NEO and at 28 h for NEC and FEC (p < 0.05). At 40 h, WPL, CA, and SDy of COP for NEO indicated balance deteriorated further while WPL and SDy for NEC and WPL, CA, SDx, and SDy for FEC indicated balance incrementally improved. Frequency bias of body-sway differed between NEO, NEC, and FEC. In Cohort 2, the SUBI correlated significantly with SSS (p < 0.05), but not with PSQI. Significance: Effects of sleep deprivation were mitigated over time, suggesting that compensatory mechanisms influenced sensory reweighting for NEC and FEC between 28 and 40 h of sleep deprivation, but not for NEO. Frequency bias of body-sway suggested that sensory reweighting in the absence of visual cues differed from that in the absence of both visual and proprioceptive cues.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?