DIFFERENCES OF OBJECTIVE ALERTNESSAND SUBJECTIVE SLEEPINESS AFTER SLEEP LOSSIN THE EARLY MORNING

Q. Zhang,H. Liang,F. Fan,N. Ma
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/sleep/zsy061.058
IF: 6.313
2018-01-01
SLEEP
Abstract:Sleep deprivation (SD) leads to significant alertness impairment and excessive sleepiness. Psychomotor Vigilance Task (PVT) is an objective tool quantify alertness. We proposed to compare the trends of PVT performance with subjective indicators from 0:00 to 6:00 in the morning after sleep loss. Seventeen healthy adults (7 males, age: 21.24 ± 2.05 years) were recruited and underwent a night of normal rested sleep (NS) and a 24-hour monitored sleep deprivation in a repeated measures design. Under both states, participants needed to complete PVT task and rate their level of sleepiness (KSS) every two hours. In addition, we also measured PVT performance and sleepiness from 0:00 to 6:00 when participants were sleep deprived. (1) Repeated measures ANOVA revealed significant main effect of state in PVT reaction time (RT) of NS and SD(F=13.39, p< 0.001). (2) There was significant difference in RT (F=7.62, p=0.01) from 0:00 to 6:00. RT slowly increased from 0:00 to 4:00, then rapidly increased and reached its peak at six o ‘clock. (3) KSS scores was significantly different from 0:00 to 6:00 (F=27.54, p< 0.001). KSS scores increased from 0:00 to 6:00 nearly in the same rate. Our results confirm that SD impairs individual’s alertness and the influence maintains across different time of periods. The findings demonstrate that PVT performance and subjective sleepiness have different changing trends from mid-night to the early morning. When people were sleep loss, PVT RT is slowly increased from 0:00 to 4:00 and rapidly increased at 6:00 while the rise of subjective sleepiness maintained at a relatively steady rates. It may indicate that individual’s subjective sleepiness is not consistent with the objective alertness in the early morning after sleep loss. National Natural Science Foundation of China 31500906 and 31671165.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?