Abstract:Background: Endovascular aortic repair (EVAR), currently the preferred treatment for abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA), has been described also for penetrating aortic ulcers (PAU) of the infrarenal aorta. However, data on its performance in this particular setting are still sparse in the literature. Aim of this study is to compare patient clinical characteristics, aorto-iliac features, and post-operative outcomes between infrarenal PAU and AAA treated by standard EVAR. Methods: In this retrospective observational case-control multicenter study, the patients treated for infrarenal PAU (G1) with EVAR in 2 high-volume European centers from January 2014 to December 2019 were prospectively entered into a dedicated database and retrospectively analyzed. A 4-fold control group (G2) of infrarenal AAA patients, homogeneous for age and gender, was also considered. Preoperative clinical characteristics, aorto-iliac features (rupture, aortic maximum diameter, proximal neck diameter and length, aortic bifurcation diameter, distance between the lowest renal artery and the aortic bifurcation [RA-AoBi], severe aortic calcification), technical success, 30-day (morbidity, reintervention, complications, mortality) and follow-up outcomes (freedom from reintervention [FFR] and survival) were compared in the 2 groups (chi square/Fisher exact test, t-student test, Mann-Whitney test, logistic regression and Kaplan-Meier analysis). Results: Seventy-three patients (age 78 ± 7 years; male 84.9%) were included in G1 and 299 (age 78.4 ± 6.6 years; male 89.3%) in G2. At the time of diagnosis, G1 patients were more often symptomatic compared with G2 (odds ratio OR 10.21, 95% confidence interval CI 4.17-24.99, P < 0.001). At preoperative computed tomography angiography, G1 patients had more ruptures (OR 8.11, 95% CI 3.50-18.78, P < 0.001), smaller maximum diameter (OR 1.05, 95% CI 1.03-1.08, P < 0.001), longer and narrower proximal neck (OR 0.97, 95% CI 0.95-0.99, P = 0.020 and OR 1.47, 95% CI 1.32-1.64, P < 0.001, respectively) narrower aortic bifurcation (OR 1.34, 95% CI 1.24-1.45, P < 0.001), lower RA-AoBi (OR 1.09, 95% CI 1.07-1.12, P < 0.001), and more severe aortic calcification (OR 57, 95% CI 16-198, P = 0.001). Technical success (G1 98.6% vs G2 95.7% P = 0.320), 30-day morbidity (G1 2.7% vs G2 8.7% P = 0.133), reintervention (G1 2.7% vs G2 2.3% P = 0.691), complications (G1 6.8% vs G2 8% P = 0.737) and mortality (G1 1.4% vs 2% P = 0.720) were comparable in the 2 groups. The mean follow-up was 17.7 ± 16.4 months in G1 and 18.8 ± 15.1 in G2 (P = 0.576). Late FFR and survival were comparable in the 2 groups (1-year FFR: G1 94.8% vs G2 97.5%, P = 0.995; 1-year survival: G1 91.7% vs G2 92.3%, P = 0.960). Conclusions: Infrarenal PAU are more often symptomatic with a higher rupture rate compared to infrarenal AAA. Despite some negative anatomical characteristics (narrower aortic bifurcation, lower RA-AoBi, extensive calcification), the results of EVAR are extremely satisfactory in this setting, suggesting that endovascular exclusion could be considered a valid treatment for infrarenal PAU.

Morphologic Characteristics and Endovascular Treatment of Primary Infrarenal Aortic Dissections.

Endovascular treatment of isolated abdominal aortic dissection and postoperative aortic remodeling.

Influence of Primary Intimal Tear Location in Type B Aortic Dissection As a Factor Portending Retrograde Type A Aortic Dissection after Endovascular Repair

Infrarenal EVAR for Penetrating Aortic Ulcer: A Comparative Study with Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm

Minimally Invasive Endovascular Repair for Nondissected Ascending Aortic Disease: A Systematic Review

Initial Study of the Extended STABILISE Technique for Complete Remodeling in Aortic Dissection

Surgical treatment of the infra-renal aortic dissection aneurysm

Long-term Results of Endovascular Reconstruction for Aortoiliac Occlusive Disease.

Endovascular treatment of acute and chronic isolated abdominal aortic dissection

Similar Midterm Clinical Outcomes and Aortic Remodeling in Bifurcated and Straight Aortic Stent Grafts Used to Treat Isolated Abdominal Aortic Dissection

Contemporary Results of Endovascular Repair of Isolated Abdominal Aortic Dissection with Unibody Bifurcated Stent Grafts.

Endovascular Repair For Retrograde Type A Intramural Hematoma With Focal Intimal Disruption In Descending Aorta

Covered endovascular reconstruction of the aortic bifurcation: A systematic review aggregated data and individual participant data meta-analysis

Endovascular Reconstruction for Total Aorto-Iliac Occlusion

Endovascular Repair of Isolated Abdominal Aortic Dissection. Literature Review

Clinical Study of a Physician Modified Y-Type Iliac Branch Device (PMYIBD) in the Endovascular Repair of Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms to Preserve the Internal Iliac Artery

Therapeutic management of isolated internal iliac artery aneurysms

Endovascular Treatment of Infrarenal Isolated Abdominal Aortic Dissection with Application of the Kissing Stents Technique: A Case Report and Review of the Literature

Mid-term outcomes of different treatments of internal iliac artery in endovascular aneurysm repair

Diagnosis and treatment of isolated abdominal aortic dissection:a report of 27 cases

Incidence and natural history of isolated abdominal aortic dissection: A population-based assessment from 1995 to 2015