Abstract:The standard single-step genomic prediction model assumes that all SNP markers explain an equal amount of genetic variance, which, however, may not be true. This is because SNPs are located in or near different genes with different functions. Therefore, it seems logical to consider SNP marker-specific weights when predicting genomic breeding values. We hypothesized that allowing differences in the amount of genetic variance explained by each SNP marker will improve prediction reliability and response to selection. To investigate this hypothesis, we first developed multi-trait standard single-step genomic models based on the current multi-trait random regression evaluation models for udder health traits of the Nordic Red (RDC) and Jersey (JER) dairy cattle populations. The models included 4 clinical mastitis (CM) traits, 3 test-day somatic cell score (SCS) traits, and the conformation traits fore udder attachment and udder depth. In the second step, we investigated the effect of applying different SNP marker weighting scenarios in the single-step genomic prediction models, for which a single-step SNP best linear unbiased prediction model was applied. We investigated the prediction reliability of the different models by forward prediction, where the last 4 years of the data were removed to estimate breeding values for validation candidates. In addition, genetic trends of the pedigree-based estimated breeding values (PEBV) and genomic enhanced breeding values (GEBV) were examined. The data sets for RDC and JER included 6.9 and 1.2 million animals of which 5.6 and 0.9 million cows had records, respectively. The number of genotyped animals was 125,789 and 64,777 for RDC and JER, respectively. Cows had repeated SCS observations but only single observations for all other traits and breeding values for all traits were modeled by one covariance function. This required modeling 12 eigenvalue breeding value coefficients for each cow and developing SNP marker weights for the principal components rather than for the biological traits. We investigated 3 SNP marker weighting scenarios: 1) a nonlinear method similar to BayesA, 2) using the classical formula 2pqû2 that accounts for allele heterozygosity, and 3) applying a mean SNP weight calculated by 2pqû2 for every 20 adjacent SNP markers. Bias, dispersion, and prediction reliability were calculated using PEBV or GEBV from the evaluation based on the full data set on those using the reduced data set. We found that the recent favorable genetic trend in CM and SCS has been accelerated since the introduction of genomic selection. The study also shows that a significant increase in prediction reliability, i.e., 0.74 vs. 0.48 for RDC and 0.72 vs. 0.41 for JER cows for CM, can be achieved with a standard single-step genomic prediction model compared with a pedigree-based prediction model. Almost all scenarios with SNP marker weighting further improved the prediction reliability between 0.5% and 12.7%. The highest improvement was achieved by weighing the SNP markers based on the 2pqû2 formula.

Short Communication: Improving the Accuracy of Genomic Prediction of Body Conformation Traits in Chinese Holsteins Using Markers Derived from High-Density Marker Panels.

Increasing Imputation and Prediction Accuracy for Chinese Holsteins Using Joint Chinese-Nordic Reference Population.

Genetic Parameter Estimates for Body Conformation Traits Using Composite Index, Principal Component, and Factor Analysis.

Improving Genomic Prediction Accuracy in the Chinese Holstein Population by Combining with the Nordic Holstein Reference Population

Accuracy of Genomic Prediction for Milk Production Traits in the Chinese Holstein Population Using a Reference Population Consisting of Cows.

Genome Wide Association Studies for Body Conformation Traits in the Chinese Holstein Cattle Population

Accuracy of Genomic Prediction Using Low-Density Marker Panels.

Improvement of Genomic Prediction by Integrating Additional Single Nucleotide Polymorphisms Selected from Imputed Whole Genome Sequencing Data.

Consistency of Linkage Disequilibrium Between Chinese and Nordic Holsteins and Genomic Prediction for Chinese Holsteins Using a Joint Reference Population.

Improving the Efficiency of Genomic Selection in Chinese Simmental beef cattle

Utility of whole-genome sequence data for across-breed genomic prediction

Validation of the Prediction Accuracy for 13 Traits in Chinese Simmental Beef Cattle Using a Preselected Low-Density SNP Panel

Genome-wide association analysis of milk production, somatic cell score, and body conformation traits in Holstein cows

Factors Affecting the Accuracy of Genomic Selection for Agricultural Economic Traits in Maize, Cattle, and Pig Populations

Estimation of Genetic Parameters for Conformation Traits and Milk Production Traits in Chinese Holsteins.

Genomic Prediction of Service Sire Effect on Female Reproductive Performance in Holstein Cattle: A Comparison Between Different Methods, Validation Population and Marker Densities.

Using Different Single-Step Strategies to Improve the Efficiency of Genomic Prediction on Body Measurement Traits in Pig

High density marker panels, SNPs prioritizing and accuracy of genomic selection

Short Communication: Replication of Genome-Wide Association Studies for Milk Production Traits in Chinese Holstein by an Efficient Rotated Linear Mixed Model.

Marker weighting improves single-step genomic prediction reliabilities of udder health traits in Nordic Red and Jersey dairy cattle populations

Short Communication: Single-step Genomic Evaluation of Milk Production Traits Using Multiple-Trait Random Regression Model in Chinese Holsteins.