Willingness and preferences of actual service suppliers regarding cancer screening programs: a multi-center survey in urban China

石菊芳,毛阿燕,孙宗祥,雷海科,邱五七,黄慧瑶,董佩,黄佳文,朱娟,李江,刘国祥,王德斌,白亚娜,孙晓杰,廖先珍,任建松,郭兰伟,兰莉,周琦,杨莉,宋冰冰,杜灵彬,朱琳,王家林,刘玉琴,任英,买玲,秦明芳,张永贞,周金意,孙校华,吴寿岭,齐啸,娄培安,蔡波,李霓,张凯,赫捷,代敏,城市癌症早诊早治项目卫生经济学评价工作组
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.issn.0254-6450.2018.02.003
2018-01-01
Abstract:Objective From the perspective of actual service suppliers regarding cancer screening,this study aimed to assess the long-term sustainability of cancer screening programs in China.Methods Based on a Cancer Screening Program in Urban China (CanSPUC),our survey focused on all the hospitals,centers for disease control and prevention (CDC) and community service centers across 16 provinces in China which participated in the programs between 2013 and 2015.All the managers (institutional/department level) and professional staff involved in the program were interviewed using either paper-based questionnaire or online approach.Results A total of 4 626 participants completed the interview.It showed that the main gains from providing screening service emphasized promotion in social value (63.6%),local reputation (35.9%),and professional skills (30.6%),whereas difficulties encountered included inadequate compensation (30.9%) and discordance among information systems (28.3%).When the service remuneration amounts to about 50 Chinese Yuan per screening item,those professional staff self-reported that they would like to work overtime.More than half (63.7%) of the staff expressed willingness to provide routine screening service,the main expectations were to promote their reputation to the local residents (48.7%) and to promote professional skills (43.1%).Those who were not willing to provide screening services were worried about the potential heavy workload (59.8%) or being interfered with their routine work (49.8%).Further detailed results regarding the different organization types and program roles were presented in the following detailed report.Conclusions Findings of gains and difficulties showed that if cancer screening is expected to become a long-term running,incentive mechanism from the program,external promotion and advocacy as well as capacity building should be strengthened;furthermore,rewards to staff's screening services should be raised according to the local situations.Results regarding the "willingness to provide service" showed that management of the program should also be strengthened,including information system building and inter-agency and inter-department coordination at the government levels.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?