[Willingness of potential service suppliers to provide cancer screening in urban China]

A Y Mao,J F Shi,W Q Qiu,P Dong,Z X Sun,H Y Huang,X J Sun,G X Liu,D B Wang,Y N Bai,X Z Liao,J S Ren,L W Guo,L Lan,Q Zhou,J Y Zhou,L Yang,J L Wang,M F Qin,Y Z Zhang,B B Song,X J Xing,L Zhu,L Mai,L B Du,Y Q Liu,P A Lou,B Cai,X H Sun,S L Wu,X Qi,K Zhang,J He,M Dai,Health Economic Evaluation Working Group, Cancer Screening Program in Urban China (CanSPUC)
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.issn.0254-6450.2018.02.004
2018-02-10
Abstract:Objective: Based on the investment for potential suppliers of cancer screening services, we assessed the reasons that affecting their participation motivation related to the long-term sustainability of cancer screening in China. Methods: Hospitals that had never been involved in any national level cancer screening project were selected by using the convenient sampling method within the 16 project cities of Cancer Screening Program in Urban China (CanSPUC) with 1 or 2 hospitals for each city. All the managers from the institutional/department level and professional staff working and providing screening services in these hospitals, were interviewed by paper-based questionnaire. SAS 9.4 was used for logical verification and data analysis. Results: A total of 31 hospitals (18 hospitals at the third level and, 13 hospitals at the second level) and 2 201 staff (508 hospital and clinic unit managers, 1 693 professional staff) completed the interview. All the hospitals guaranteed their potential capacity in service providing. 92.5% hospital managers showed strong willingness in providing cancer screening services, while 68.3% of them declared that the project fund-raising function was the responsibility of the government. For professional staff, their prospect gains from providing screening service would include development on professional skills (72.4%) and material rewards (46.8%). Their main worries would include extra work for CanSPUC might interfere their routine work (42.1%) plus inadequate compensation (41.8%). Medians of the prospect compensation for extra work ran between 20 to 90 Chinese Yuan per screening item respectively. For all the screening items, workers from the third-level hospitals expected their compensation to be twice as much of those working at the second level hospitals. Conclusion: Professional capacity building and feasible material incentive seemed to be the two key factors that influenced the sustainability and development of the programs.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?