Efficacy and Safety of A Second Generation Biodegradable-Polymer Sirolimus-Eluting Stent: One Year Results of The CREDIT 2 Trial.

Kai Xu,Yaling Han,Bo Xu,Yuejin Yang,Geng Wang,Hui Li,Yong Sun,Ling Tao,Haichang Wang,Zuyi Yuan,Liu Huiliang,Jinghua Liu,Yongping Jia,Genshan Ma,Guosheng Fu,Xiaodong Li,Shuren Li,Shouli Wang,Kui Pu
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1755-5922.12327
2018-01-01
Cardiovascular Therapeutics
Abstract:Aims: We performed a multicenter, randomized controlled trial to determine the noninferiority of a novel biodegradable polymer drug-eluting stent (BP-DES), the EXCEL 2 stent, to the first-generation BP-DES, the EXCEL stent. Methods and Results: Patients (n=419) scheduled to undergo percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) were randomized to receive either the EXCEL 2 stent (n = 208) or the EXCEL stent (n = 211) from 15 Chinese centers. At 9months, primary endpoint in-stent late loss (LL) difference was-0.03mm (95% confidence interval: -0.09mm to 0.04mm) between the EXCEL 2 group (0.140 +/- 26mm) and the EXCEL group (0.160 +/- 36mm), demonstrating the noninferiority of EXCEL 2 to EXCEL in terms of in-stent LL (P for noninferiority < .0001). Besides, target lesion failure (TLF) was statistically lower in EXCEL 2 group compared with EXCEL through 1year (HR [95%CI] = 0.45 [0.20,0.98], Plog-rank = .04). Definite/probable ST was observed in 0.0% vs 1.9% (P = .12) of EXCEL 2 vs EXCEL-treated subjects. Conclusions: The second-generation BP-DES (EXCEL 2) was noninferior to the first-generation BP-DES (EXCEL) for the primary endpoint of in-stent LL at 9months.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?