Abstract:Background: There are few data comparing clinical outcomes of complex percutaneous coronary intervention (CPCI) when using biodegradable polymer drug-eluting stents (BP-DES) or second-generation durable polymer drug-eluting stents (DP-DES). The purpose of this study was to investigate the safety and efficacy of BP-DES and compare that with DP-DES in patients with and without CPCI during a 5-year follow-up. Methods: Patients who exclusively underwent BP-DES or DP-DES implantation in 2013 at Fuwai Hospital were consecutively enrolled and stratified into two categories based on CPCI presence or absence. CPCI included at least one of the following features: unprotected left main lesion, ≥2 lesions treated, ≥2 stents implanted, total stent length >40 mm, moderate-to-severe calcified lesion, chronic total occlusion, or bifurcated target lesion. The primary endpoint was major adverse cardiac events (MACE) including all-cause death, recurrent myocardial infarction, and total coronary revascularization (target lesion revascularization, target vessel revascularization [TVR], and non-TVR) during the 5-year follow-up. The secondary endpoint was total coronary revascularization. Results: Among the 7712 patients included, 4882 (63.3%) underwent CPCI. Compared with non-CPCI patients, CPCI patients had higher 2- and 5-year incidences of MACE and total coronary revascularization. Following multivariable adjustment including stent type, CPCI was an independent predictor of MACE (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR]: 1.151; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.017–1.303, P = 0.026) and total coronary revascularization (aHR: 1.199; 95% CI: 1.037–1.388, P = 0.014) at 5 years. The results were consistent at the 2-year endpoints. In patients with CPCI, BP-DES use was associated with significantly higher MACE rates at 5 years (aHR: 1.256; 95% CI: 1.078–1.462, P = 0.003) and total coronary revascularization (aHR: 1.257; 95% CI: 1.052–1.502, P = 0.012) compared with that of DP-DES, but there was a similar risk at 2 years. However, BP-DES had comparable safety and efficacy profiles including MACE and total coronary revascularization compared with DP-DES in patients with non-CPCI at 2 and 5 years. Conclusions: Patients underwent CPCI remained at a higher risk of mid- to long-term adverse events regardless of the stent type. The effect of BP-DES compared with DP-DES on outcomes was similar in CPCI and non-CPCI patients at 2 years but had inconsistent effects at the 5-year clinical endpoints.

Long‐Term Clinical Outcomes of Biodegradable‐ Versus Durable‐Polymer‐Coated Everolimus‐Eluting Stents in Real‐World Post‐Marketing Study

A randomised comparison of a novel abluminal groove-filled biodegradable polymer sirolimus-eluting stent with a durable polymer everolimus-eluting stent: clinical and angiographic follow-up of the TARGET I trial

Comparison of the safety and efficacy of biodegradable polymer drug-eluting stents versus durable polymer drug-eluting stents: a meta-analysis

Long-Term Effects of Drug-Eluting Stents Versus Bare Metal Stents on Patients with Acute St-Elevation Myocardial Infarction Undergoing Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: Outcomes of 3-Year Clinical Follow-Up

Five-year outcomes of biodegradable versus second-generation durable polymer drug-eluting stents used in complex percutaneous coronary intervention

Clinical Performance of Biodegradable Versus Permanent Polymer Drug-Eluting Stents: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Clinical Trials at Long-Term Follow-Up

Impact of Biodegradable Versus Durable Polymer Drug-Eluting Stents on Clinical Outcomes in Patients with Coronary Artery Disease: a Meta-Analysis of 15 Randomized Trials.

Short-and long-term outcomes with drug-eluting and bare-metal coronary stents: a mixed-treatment comparison analysis of 117 762 patient-years of follow-up from randomized trials

A Randomized Comparison of Novel Biodegradable Polymer- and Durable Polymer-Coated Cobalt-Chromium Sirolimus-Eluting Stents.

Safety and efficacy of degradable vs. permanent polymer drug-eluting stents: A meta-analysis of 18,395 patients from randomized trials

Biodegradable polymer-coated versus durable polymer-coated sirolimus-eluting stents: the final 5-year outcomes of the I-LOVE-IT 2 trial

Angiographic and clinical outcomes of patients implanted with ultrathin, biodegradable polymer sirolimus-eluting stents versus durable polymer drug-eluting stents for percutaneous coronary intervention: an updated meta-analysis based on randomized controlled trials

Efficacy And Safety Of A Biodegradable Polymer Sirolimus-Eluting Stent In Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Long‐term Clinical, Angiographic, and Intravascular Ultrasound Outcomes of Biodegradable Polymer‐coated Sirolimus‐eluting Stents

Randomized Clinical Trial Comparing Abluminal Biodegradable Polymer Sirolimus-Eluting Stents With Durable Polymer Sirolimus-Eluting Stents: Nine Months Angiographic And 5-Year Clinical Outcomes

Five-Year Comparative Efficacy of Everolimus-Eluting vs. Resolute Zotarolimus-Eluting Stents in Patients with Acute Coronary Syndrome Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.

Safety and Efficacy of Biodegradable Polymer-biolimus-eluting Stents (BP-BES) Compared with Durable Polymer-everolimus-eluting Stents (DP-EES) in Patients Undergoing Complex Percutaneous Coronary Intervention

Efficacy and safety of durable versus biodegradable polymer drug-eluting stents in patients with acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock

A Prospective, Randomized Trial of Bioresorbable Polymer Drug-Eluting Stents Versus Fully Bioresorbable Scaffolds in Patients Undergoing Coronary Stenting

First‐in‐man Study Evaluating the Safety and Efficacy of a Second Generation Biodegradable Polymer Sirolimus‐eluting Stent in the Treatment of Patients with De Novo Coronary Lesions: Clinical, Angiographic, and OCT Outcomes of CREDIT‐1

Real Polymer-Free Sirolimus- and Probucol-Eluting Versus Biodegradable Polymer Sirolimus-Eluting Stents for Obstructive Coronary Artery Disease: Dkplus-Wave 1, A Multi-Center, Randomized, Prospective Trial