Abstract:Objective To compare the safety and efficacy between biologic fixation and traditional cement stems for the fixation of distal femoral prostheses for reconstruction following tumor resection. Methods Retrospective analysis was performed of patients who received a first distal femoral tumor prosthesis, with a rotating hinge, in the Department of Orthopaedic Oncology of Beijing Jishuitan Hospital between October 2011 and January 2016. Two hundred and sixty eligible cases were enrolled, with a cemented fixation used in 199 of these cases and a biologic fixation in 61 cases. Survival rates and survival time of prostheses were analyzed, with prosthetic failure considered as the endpoint event for survival time of the prosthesis. Kaplan–Meier survival curve and the log‐rank test were used to compare survival rates between the two types of fixation methods, and factors that may affect the survival rate of prosthesis were evaluated. Results Of the 260 cases forming our study group, 138 were males and 122 females, with 102 males and 97 females in the cemented fixation group (mean age, 25.8 years; range, 8–72 years) and 36 males and 25 females in the biologic fixation group (mean age, 25.5 years; range, 12–59 years). Osteosarcoma was the most common type of tumor (188 cases, 72.3%), of which 145 cases (72.9%) were in the cemented and 45 cases (72.1%) in the biologic fixation group. Among the 260 cases enrolled into the study group, 13 patients were lost to follow‐up. The average duration of follow‐up for the remaining 247 cases was 28.8 months (median, 28.8 months; range, 4–61 months). The 3‐year overall survival rate of prostheses was 87.2% for the biologic fixation group and 80.4% in the cemented fixation group (P = 0.389). The 3‐year mechanical survival rate (excluding cases of infection and oncologic progression) was 100% for the biologic fixation and 97.6% for the cemented fixation group (P = 0.468). Complications were identified in 21 cases: 3 cases (5%) in the biologic and 18 cases (9.6%) in the cemented fixation group (P = 0.264). Two revisions were required in the cemented fixation group, but no revision was required in the biologic fixation group. A total of 10 patients required amputation after prosthesis implantation. Of these, 7 cases (4 cement and 3 biologic) were due to tumor recurrence; 3 cases were due to infection, with all cases occurring in the cement fixation group. Conclusion The current study provides a baseline reference for future mid‐term to long‐term follow‐up, laying the foundation for further studies and comparison of the incidence of aseptic loosening of both types of prosthesis.

Comparison between uncemented and cemented fixation for the tibial component in distal femoral replacement: a clinical and radiological study

Short Term Follow-Up after Removal of Internal Fixation after Femoral Neck Fracture Healing in Adults

Cementless Porous Tantalum Monoblock Tibia Vs Cemented Modular Tibia in Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Meta-Analysis

Early equivalence of uncemented press-fit and Compress femoral fixation

A prospective randomised controlled trial of cemented and uncemented tibial baseplates: functional and radiological outcomes

Intramedullary Nailing Versus Plating for Extra-Articular Distal Tibial Metaphyseal Fracture: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Comparative Analysis of Early Follow‐up of Biologic Fixation and Cemented Stem Fixation for Femoral Tumor Prosthesis

The Biomechanical Study of Intertrochanic Fractures Treated with Cemented Femoral Stem

Randomized controlled trial comparing traditional versus enhanced-fixation designs of a novel cemented total knee arthroplasty tibial component

Cemented and Press-fit Femoral Stems for the Management of Oncologic Femoral Tumors

Cemented Vs Cementless Femoral Fixation for Total Hip Arthroplasty After Displaced Femoral Neck Fracture: A Nationwide Analysis of Short-Term Complications and Readmission Rates

The primary stability of ultrashort residual proximal femur fixed with triangular fixation stem prosthesis: a comparative biomechanical study based on sawbones models

The Influence of Dorr Type and Femoral Fixation on Outcomes Following Total Hip Arthroplasty for Acute Femoral Neck Fractures: A Multicenter Study

Clinical study on the effect of intramedullary fixation and extramedullary fixation on unstable intertrochanteric fractures

The influence of stem length and fixation on initial femoral component stability in revision total knee replacement

Comparison of Cylindrical and Tapered Stem Designs for Femoral Revision Hip Arthroplasty

A high risk of postoperative periprosthetic femoral fracture in Dorr type C femurs: a retrospective cohort study with 10-year follow-up data and a preliminary monochromatic image analysis

Uncemented, curved, short endoprosthesis stem for distal femoral reconstruction: early follow-up outcomes

Efficacy of cementless porous tantalum tibial components versus cemented tibial components in primary total knee arthroplasty: A meta-analysis

Long-Term Results and Quality-Of-Life Assessment Based on Patient-Reported Outcome Measures

Cemented versus Cementless Femoral Fixation for Elective Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Nationwide Analysis of Short-Term Complication and Readmission Rates