Early Response To Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy Can Help Predict Long-Term Survival In Patients With Cervical Cancer

Xiong Li,Kecheng Huang,Qinghua Zhang,Jian Shen,Hang Zhou,Runfeng Yang,Lin Wang,Jiong Liu,Jincheng Zhang,Haiying Sun,Yao Jia,Xiaofang Du,Haoran Wang,Song Deng,Ting Ding,Jingjing Jiang,Yunping Lu,Shuang Li,Shixuan Wang,Ding Ma
DOI: https://doi.org/10.18632/oncotarget.11460
2016-01-01
Oncotarget
Abstract:It is still controversial whether cervical cancer patients with clinical responses after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) have a better long-term survival or not. This study was designed to investigate the effect of the clinical response on the disease-free survival (DFS) of cervical cancer patients undergoing NACT. A total of 853 patients from a retrospective study were used to evaluate whether the clinical response was an indicator for the long-term response, and 493 patients from a prospective cohort study were used for further evaluation. The survival difference was detected by log-rank test, univariate and multivariate Cox regression and a pooled analysis. The log-rank test revealed that compared with non-responders, the DFS of responders was significantly higher in the retrospective data (P = 0.007). Univariate Cox regression showed that the clinical response was an indicator of long-term survival in the retrospective study (HR 1.83, 95% CI 1.18-2.85, P = 0.007). In a multivariate Cox model, the clinical response was still retained as an independent significant prognostic factor in the retrospective study (HR 1.59, 95% CI 1.01-2.50, P = 0.046). The result was also validated in the prospective data with similar results. These findings implied that the clinical response can be regarded as an independent predictor of DFS.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?