Abstract:Objective: To investigate the compensatory mechanism of maintaining the sagittal balance in degenerative lumbar scoliosis patients with different pelvic incidence (PI). Methods: This was a retrospective imaging observation study. Patients in our department with degenerative lumbar scoliosis between 2017 and 2019 were reviewed. A total of 36 patients were eligible and included in the present study. The average age of those patients was 64.22 years, including 8 men and 28 women. The coronal and sagittal parameters were measured on full-length spine X-ray film, including globe kyphosis (GK), lumber lordosis (LL), thoracolumbar kyphosis (TLK), thoracic kyphosis (TK), sagittal vertical axis (SVA), sagittal shift angle, Cobb angle, coronal shift angle, and vertebra. The anterior pelvic plane angle (APPA) and pelvic parameters were also measured, including the pelvic tilt (PT), the PI, and the sacral slope (SS). PI-LL, LL-SS, and GK-SS were calculated. Traditional pelvic tilt was also calculated using the following formula: cPT = PI × 0.37-7. These patients were divided into two groups according to their PI values. The patients' PI value in Group 1 was smaller than 50°. The patients' PI value in Group 2 was equal to or larger than 50°. Results: These patients' SS, PT, PI, LL, TLK, TK, and GK were 28.70° ± 11.36°, 23.28° ± 6.55°, 52.00° ± 11.03°, 31.66° ± 14.12°, 12.12° ± 14.9°, 17.81° ± 13.53°, and -13.17° ± 16.27°. The sagittal shift angle, the APPA, the Cobb angle, the coronal shift angle, vertebra, PI-LL, cPT, APPA-4, LL-SS, and GK-SS were 4.38° ± 5.75°, -12.55° ± 8.83°, 30.03° ± 12.59°, 2.40° ± 2.13°, 4.08 ± 0.93, 19.86° ± 10.97°, 12.35° ± 4.55°, -8.30° ± 9.07°, 3.30° ± 8.82°, and 15.53° ± 9.83°, respectively. There was no significant difference between PT and cPT + APPA-4 or between cPT and PT-APPA+4. There was significant difference between PT and cPT + APPA or between cPT and PT-APPA. This demonstrated that the APPA-4 is reliable as degree of the pelvic sagittal retroversion. There were significant differences in SS, PI, LL, TLK, GK, APPA, PT-APPA, PT-APPA+4, cPT, and APPA-4 between Group 1 and Group 2. There were no significant differences in PT, TK, sagittal shift angle, SVA, Cobb angle, coronal shift angle, vertebra number, PI-LL, cPT + APPA, cPT + APPA-4, LL-SS, and GK-SS between Group 1 and Group 2. The Pearson tests showed that PI-LL had significant correlations with TK, LL, sagittal shift angle, SVA, and LL-SS. There was no significant correlation between PI-LL and Cobb angle, GK, TLK, APPA, vertebra, Coronal Shift Angle, or GK-SS. Conclusion: The APPA-4 is reliable as degree of the pelvic sagittal retroversion. In degenerative lumbar scoliosis, patients with smaller PI tended to rely more on the pelvic retroversion to maintain the sagittal balance than patients with larger PI, or patients with smaller PI were likely to start up the pelvic retroversion compensatory mechanism earlier than the patients with larger PI.

Analysis of Compensatory Mechanisms in the Pelvis and Lower Extremities in Patients with Pelvic Incidence and Lumbar Lordosis Mismatch

The factors influencing the adjustment function of PI on spinal sagittal balance in normal subject

Femoral Head Retroposition As a Potential Compensatory Mechanism in Patients with a Severe Mismatch Between Pelvic Incidence and Lumbar Lordosis

Spontaneous Improvement of Compensatory Knee Flexion after Surgical Correction of Mismatch Between Pelvic Incidence and Lumbar Lordosis.

Compensatory Mechanism of Maintaining the Sagittal Balance in Degenerative Lumbar Scoliosis Patients with Different Pelvic Incidence

An Analysis of the Interactions Between the Spine, Pelvis, and Lower Limbs in Asymptomatic Adults with Limited Pelvic Compensation.

Compensatory mechanisms in adult degenerative thoracolumbar spinal deformity – Radiographic patterns, their reversibility after corrective surgery, and the influence of pelvic morphology

Impact of Pelvic Anteversion on Spinopelvic Alignment in an Asymptomatic Population: a Dynamic Perspective of Standing and Sitting

The Role of Pelvic Compensation in Sagittal Balance and Imbalance: The Impact of Pelvic Compensation on Spinal Alignment and Clinical Outcomes Following Adult Spinal Deformity Surgery

Sagittal lumbar and pelvic alignment in the standing and sitting positions

Pelvic index: A new pelvic parameter for assessing sagittal spinal alignment

Sagittal Parameters of Spine‐Pelvis‐Hip Joints in Patients with Lumbar Spinal Stenosis

Severe Pelvic Obliquity Affects Femoral Offset in Patients with Total Hip Arthroplasty but Not Leg-Length Inequality

Analysis of Spino-pelvic Sagittal Alignment in Young Chinese Patients with Lumbar Disc Herniation

Stress Analysis of the Lower Lumbar Spine Three-Joint Complex According to Different Pelvic Incidences

Modified Lumbosacral Angle and Modified Pelvic Incidence As New Parameters for Management of Pediatric High-grade Spondylolisthesis

Sagittal Plane Analysis of the Spine and Pelvis in Degenerative Lumbar Scoliosis

[Effects of Pelvic Balance after Posterior Reduction of Balanced L5-S1 Ⅲ-grade Isthmic Spondylolisthesis in Adults].

Identification and impact of failure of pelvic compensation in patients with adult spinal deformity

Analysis of Spinopelvic Sagittal Alignment in Patients with Thoracic and Thoracolumbar Angular Kyphosis

An analysis of spinopelvic sagittal alignment after lumbar lordosis reconstruction for degenerative spinal diseases: how much balance can be obtained?