Optimized approach to cine MRI of uterine peristalsis.

Shanshan Liu,Qi Zhang,Chengying Yin,Song Liu,Queenie Chan,Weibo Chen,Jian He,Bin Zhu
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/jmri.25303
IF: 4.4
2016-01-01
Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Abstract:PurposeTo determine the optimal slice thickness, playback rate, and scan time for uterine peristalsis with 3.0T magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Materials and MethodsIn all, 23 young female volunteers underwent a 3.0T MRI scan with different slice thicknesses of 3mm (Cine(3mm)), 5mm (Cine(5mm)), and 7mm (Cine(7mm)) for 6 minutes. Subjective image quality score, signal-to-noise ratios (SNRs), and contrast-to-noise ratios (CNRs) of those MR images were evaluated by two radiologists independently. The number, intensity, and direction of uterine peristalsis with different thickness were compared at various playback rates. Also, the peristalsis frequency was counted and compared in different acquisition durations (1-6 minutes). ResultsThe subjective image quality score, peristalsis number, and intensity were significantly higher in Cine(7mm) and Cine(5mm) than Cine(3mm) (P < 0.05), while the SNRs and CNRs of Cine(7mm) were significantly higher than Cine(3mm) (P < 0.05). Peristalsis numbers did not differ significantly at different playback rates with the same slice thickness (P=0.548-0.962). However, peristalsis intensity at 12x, and 15x was significantly greater than that at 8x the actual speed for Cine(7mm) and Cine(5mm) (P < 0.05). The peristalsis frequency at 3, 4, 5, 6 minutes was significantly higher than that at 1 minute and 2 minutes (P < 0.05). ConclusionWe recommend a slice thickness of 5mm or 7mm and a scan time of 3 minutes for uterine peristalsis with 3.0T MRI, and a playback rate of 12x or 15x the actual speed for peristalsis observation. J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2016;44:1397-1404.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?