Abstract:Background: Digital thoracic drainage systems have recently been introduced and widely used in clinical practices in developed countries. These systems can monitor intrathoracic pressure changes and air leaks in real time, and also allow for objective and quantitative analyses, which aid in managing patients with a prolonged persistent air leak into the pleural space. We investigated the feasibility and effectiveness of such a new device versus the traditional vacuum system for treating patients with pneumothorax. Methods: Closed thoracostomy drainage was carried out on 100 adult patients with primary or secondary pneumothorax between January 2017 and December 2018. All the patients were aged ≥18 years and treated with a chest tube at a single medical center by the same cardiothoracic surgeons and intensivists. Patients who underwent closed thoracostomy drainage using an indwelling 24-French chest tube were divided into 2 groups immediately before closed thoracostomy: the digital thoracic drainage group (digital group, n=50) and the traditional analogue thoracic drainage group (analogue group, n=50). The detailed information about demographic data, treatment outcome, duration of indwelling catheterization., hospital days, cost-effectiveness and patient satisfaction was evaluated. We also evaluated whether digitally recorded intrapleural pressure changes and air leaks would predict chest tube removal timing and outcome. Results: The baseline parameters of the 2 groups were comparable with no significant differences in sex, age, weight or body mass index. The mean hospital day was shorter in the digital group than in the analogue group (17.96±12.23 vs. 18.32±16.64, P=0.902), and there was no statistically significant difference in the hospital length of stay between the 2 groups. Air leaks through the chest tube and duration of chest tube indwelling hours showed no significant statistical differences between the digital and analogue groups (213.47±219.80 vs. 261.94±184.47, P=0.235 and 223.44±218.75 vs 275.29±186.06, P=0.205, respectively). Total drainage amount and ambulation time per day were significantly higher in the digital group than in the analogue group [209.62±139.63 vs. 162.48±80.42 (P=0.042) and 6.42±3.62 vs.3.94±1.74 (P<0.001), respectively]. Hours of full expansion were significantly shorter and sleep disturbance caused by the noise of chest tube drainage was less in the digital group than in the analogue group [25.64±14.55 vs. 46.52±25.53 (P<0.001) and 2.38±1.03 vs. 5.70±2.87 (P<0.001), respectively]. Conclusions: To date, there is no definite consensus and guidelines on the standardized digital suction system in pneumothorax. This study proposed the guidelines for the application of digital thoracic drainage systems in pneumothorax and also suggested that digital thoracic drainage systems might be a valuable tool to determine chest tube removal timing and reducing the length of hospital stay in patients with pneumothorax.

[Application of Digital Drainage System in Postoperative Refractory Prolonged Air Leaks after Pulmonary Surgery].

Clinical Observation of Modified Implantation of ASD Closure Device to Treat BPFs

Hybrid (Digital/Water Seal) Chest Drainage System – An Innovative Device for Patients with Anticipated Air Leaks

Digital Chest Drainage System Versus Traditional Chest Drainage System after Pulmonary Resection: a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Clinical outcomes and staff satisfaction after adoption of digital chest drainage system for minimally invasive lung resections

Clinical application of a digital thoracic drainage system for objectifying and quantifying air leak versus the traditional vacuum system: a retrospective observational study

Lower Recurrence Rate After Surgical Treatment for Primary Spontaneous Pneumothorax Using a Digital Chest Drainage System

Digital chest drainage is better than traditional chest drainage following pulmonary surgery: a meta-analysis.

Study on the Application of A New Type of Anhydrous Thoracic Negative Pressure Drainage Device in Patients after Thoracic Surgery

Clinical Application of a Multi-Groove Silicone Drain Combined with Unidirectional Negative-Pressure Drainage System in Single-Operating-port Video-Assisted Thoracoscopic Lung Cancer Surgery: a Comparison Study

A Delphi Consensus Report from the "prolonged Air Leak: A Survey" Study Group on Prevention and Management of Postoperative Air Leaks after Minimally Invasive Anatomical Resections.

Tubeless single-port thoracoscopic sublobar resection: indication and safety

Suitable Patient Selection and Optimal Timing of Treatment for Persistent Air Leak after Lung Resection

Design and application of small-diameter closed thoracic drainage tube fixation following lung wedge resection: A randomised prospective study

Risk Factors for Prolonged Air Leak after Pulmonary Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

External Suction Versus Simple Water-Seal on Chest Drainage Following Pulmonary Surgery: an Updated Meta-Analysis

Progress in Prevention and Treatment of Prolonged Air Leaks after Pulmonary Operation

Prophylactic air-extraction strategy after thoracoscopic wedge resection

Effectiveness of Stitch With Pledget to Prevent Prolonged Air Leak in Thoracoscopic Lung Resection

Lung Ultrasound and Diaphragmatic Excursion Assessment for Evaluating Perioperative Atelectasis and Aeration Loss During Video-Assisted Thoracic Surgery: a Feasibility Study

Efficiency and safety of TachoSil® in the treatment of postoperative air leakage following pulmonary surgery: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.