[Perinatal period. b. Prenatal diagnosis by genetic analysis].

K. Suzumori

1994-08-01

Abstract:

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

Clinical application of a digital thoracic drainage system for objectifying and quantifying air leak versus the traditional vacuum system: a retrospective observational study

Song Am Lee,Jun Seok Kim,Hyun Keun Chee,Jae Joon Hwang,Michael Ji,Yo Han Kim,Hyeong Ju Moon,Woo Surng Lee

DOI: https://doi.org/10.21037/jtd-20-2993

Abstract:Background: Digital thoracic drainage systems have recently been introduced and widely used in clinical practices in developed countries. These systems can monitor intrathoracic pressure changes and air leaks in real time, and also allow for objective and quantitative analyses, which aid in managing patients with a prolonged persistent air leak into the pleural space. We investigated the feasibility and effectiveness of such a new device versus the traditional vacuum system for treating patients with pneumothorax. Methods: Closed thoracostomy drainage was carried out on 100 adult patients with primary or secondary pneumothorax between January 2017 and December 2018. All the patients were aged ≥18 years and treated with a chest tube at a single medical center by the same cardiothoracic surgeons and intensivists. Patients who underwent closed thoracostomy drainage using an indwelling 24-French chest tube were divided into 2 groups immediately before closed thoracostomy: the digital thoracic drainage group (digital group, n=50) and the traditional analogue thoracic drainage group (analogue group, n=50). The detailed information about demographic data, treatment outcome, duration of indwelling catheterization., hospital days, cost-effectiveness and patient satisfaction was evaluated. We also evaluated whether digitally recorded intrapleural pressure changes and air leaks would predict chest tube removal timing and outcome. Results: The baseline parameters of the 2 groups were comparable with no significant differences in sex, age, weight or body mass index. The mean hospital day was shorter in the digital group than in the analogue group (17.96±12.23 vs. 18.32±16.64, P=0.902), and there was no statistically significant difference in the hospital length of stay between the 2 groups. Air leaks through the chest tube and duration of chest tube indwelling hours showed no significant statistical differences between the digital and analogue groups (213.47±219.80 vs. 261.94±184.47, P=0.235 and 223.44±218.75 vs 275.29±186.06, P=0.205, respectively). Total drainage amount and ambulation time per day were significantly higher in the digital group than in the analogue group [209.62±139.63 vs. 162.48±80.42 (P=0.042) and 6.42±3.62 vs.3.94±1.74 (P<0.001), respectively]. Hours of full expansion were significantly shorter and sleep disturbance caused by the noise of chest tube drainage was less in the digital group than in the analogue group [25.64±14.55 vs. 46.52±25.53 (P<0.001) and 2.38±1.03 vs. 5.70±2.87 (P<0.001), respectively]. Conclusions: To date, there is no definite consensus and guidelines on the standardized digital suction system in pneumothorax. This study proposed the guidelines for the application of digital thoracic drainage systems in pneumothorax and also suggested that digital thoracic drainage systems might be a valuable tool to determine chest tube removal timing and reducing the length of hospital stay in patients with pneumothorax.
Digital Chest Drainage System Versus Traditional Chest Drainage System after Pulmonary Resection: a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Hong Wang,Wenbin Hu,Liang Ma,Yiran Zhang

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13019-019-0842-x

2019-01-01

Journal of Cardiothoracic Surgery

Abstract:BackgroundSeveral randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and observational studies have compared the efficacy of digital chest drainage system versus traditional chest drainage system. However, the results were inconsistent.MethodsWe searched the Web of Science and Pubmed for observational studies and RCTs that compared the effect of digital chest drainage system with traditional chest drainage system after pulmonary resection. Eight studies (5 randomized control trails and 3 observational studies) comprising 1487 patients met the eligibility criteria.ResultsCompared with the traditional chest drainage system, digital chest drainage system reduced the risk of prolonged air leak (PAL) (RR=0.54, 95%CI 0.40-0.73, p<0.0001), and shortened the duration of chest drainage (SMD=-0.35, 95%CI -0.60 - -0.09, p=0.008) and length of hospital stay (SMD=-0.35, 95%CI -0.61 - -0.09, p=0.007) in patients after pulmonary resection.ConclusionsDigital chest drainage system is expected to benefit patients to attain faster recovery and higher life quality as well as to reduce the risk of postoperative complications. Further RCTs with larger sample size are still needed to more clearly elucidate the advantages of digital chest drainage system.
Anatomic Lung Resection Outcomes After Implementation of a Universal Thoracic ERAS Protocol Across a Diverse Healthcare System

Adam R Dyas,Christina M Stuart,Michael R Bronsert,Alyson D Kelleher,Kyle E Bata,Ethan U Cumbler,Crystal J Erickson,Matthew G Blum,Annette S Vizena,Alison R Barker,Lauren Funk,Karishma Sack,Benjamin A Abrams,Simran K Randhawa,Elizabeth A David,John D Mitchell,Michael J Weyant,Christopher D Scott,Robert A Meguid,Adam R. Dyas,Christina M. Stuart,Michael R. Bronsert,Alyson D. Kelleher,Kyle E. Bata,Ethan U. Cumbler,Crystal J. Erickson,Matthew G. Blum,Annette S. Vizena,Alison R. Barker,Benjamin A. Abrams,Simran K. Randhawa,Elizabeth A. David,John D. Mitchell,Michael J. Weyant,Christopher D. Scott,Robert A. Meguid

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/sla.0000000000006243

IF: 13.787

2024-02-22

Annals of Surgery

Abstract:Objective: We sought to evaluate how implementing a thoracic Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) protocol impacted surgical outcomes after elective anatomic lung resection. Summary Background Data: The effect of implementing the ERAS Society/European Society of Thoracic Surgery (ESTS) thoracic ERAS protocol on postoperative outcomes throughout an entire healthcare system has not yet been reported. Methods: This was a prospective cohort study within one healthcare system (1/2019-3/2023). A thoracic ERAS protocol was implemented on 5/1/2021 for elective anatomic lung resections, and postoperative outcomes were tracked using the electronic health record and Vizient data. The primary outcome was overall morbidity; secondary outcomes included individual complications, length of stay (LOS), opioid use, chest tube duration, and total cost. Patients were grouped into pre- and post-ERAS cohorts. Bivariable comparisons were performed using independent t-test, chi-square, or Fisher’s exact tests, and multivariable logistic regression was performed to control for confounders. Results: There were 1,007 patients in the cohort; 450 (44.7%) were in the post-ERAS group. Mean age was 66.2 years; most patients were female (65.1%), white (83.8%), had a BMI between 18.5-29.9 (69.7%), and were ASA class 3 (80.6%). Patients in the post-implementation group had lower risk-adjusted rates of any morbidity, any respiratory complication, pneumonia, surgical site infection, arrhythmias, infections, opioid usage, ICU use, and shorter postoperative LOS (all P <0.05). Conclusions: Postoperative outcomes were improved after implementation of an evidence-based thoracic ERAS protocol throughout the healthcare system. This study validates the ERAS Society/ESTS guidelines and demonstrates that simultaneous multihospital implementation can be feasible and effective.

surgery
Anatomic Lung Resection Outcomes After Implementation of a Universal Thoracic ERAS Protocol Across a Diverse Health Care System

Adam R Dyas,Christina M Stuart,Michael R Bronsert,Alyson D Kelleher,Kyle E Bata,Ethan U Cumbler,Crystal J Erickson,Matthew G Blum,Annette S Vizena,Alison R Barker,Lauren Funk,Karishma Sack,Benjamin A Abrams,Simran K Randhawa,Elizabeth A David,John D Mitchell,Michael J Weyant,Christopher D Scott,Robert A Meguid

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0000000000006243

2024-06-01

Abstract:Objective: We sought to evaluate how implementing a thoracic enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocol impacted surgical outcomes after elective anatomic lung resection. Background: The effect of implementing the ERAS Society/European Society of Thoracic Surgery thoracic ERAS protocol on postoperative outcomes throughout an entire health care system has not yet been reported. Methods: This was a prospective cohort study within one health care system (January 2019-March, 2023). A thoracic ERAS protocol was implemented on May 1, 2021 for elective anatomic lung resections, and postoperative outcomes were tracked using the electronic health record and Vizient data. The primary outcome was overall morbidity; secondary outcomes included individual complications, length of stay, opioid use, chest tube duration, and total cost. Patients were grouped into pre-ERAS and post-ERAS cohorts. Bivariable comparisons were performed using independent t -test, χ 2 , or Fisher exact tests, and multivariable logistic regression was performed to control for confounders. Results: There were 1007 patients in the cohort; 450 (44.7%) were in the post-ERAS group. Mean age was 66.2 years; most patients were female (65.1%), white (83.8%), had a body mass index between 18.5 and 29.9 (69.7%), and were ASA class 3 (80.6%). Patients in the postimplementation group had lower risk-adjusted rates of any morbidity, respiratory complication, pneumonia, surgical site infection, arrhythmias, infections, opioid usage, ICU use, and shorter postoperative length of stay (all P <0.05). Conclusions: Postoperative outcomes were improved after the implementation of an evidence-based thoracic ERAS protocol throughout the health care system. This study validates the ERAS Society/European Society of Thoracic Surgery guidelines and demonstrates that simultaneous multihospital implementation can be feasible and effective.
Digital chest drainage is better than traditional chest drainage following pulmonary surgery: a meta-analysis.

Jian Zhou,Mengyuan Lyu,Nan Chen,Zihuai Wang,Yang Hai,Jianqi Hao,Lunxu Liu

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/ejcts/ezy141

IF: 4.534

2018-01-01

European Journal of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery

Abstract:In this systematic review with meta-analysis, we sought to determine the current strength of evidence for or against digital and traditional chest drainage systems following pulmonary surgery with regards to hard clinical end points and cost-effectiveness. PubMed, EMBASE and Web of Science were searched from their inception to 31 July 2017. The weighted mean difference (WMD) and the risk ratio were used for continuous and dichotomous outcomes, respectively, each with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). The heterogeneity and risk of bias were also assessed. A total of 10 randomized controlled trials enrolling 1268 patients were included in this study. Overall, digital chest drainage reduced the duration of chest tube placement (WMD -0.72 days; 95% CI -1.03 to -0.40; P < 0.001), length of hospital stay (WMD -0.97 days; 95% CI -1.46 to -0.48; P < 0.001), air leak duration (WMD -0.95 days; 95% CI -1.51 to 0.39; P < 0.001), and postoperative cost (WMD -443.16 euros; 95% CI -747.60 to -138.73; P = 0.004). However, the effect differences between the 2 groups were not significant for the duration of a prolonged air leak and the percentage of patients discharged home on a device. The stability of these studies was strong. No publication bias was detected. It may be necessary to use a digital chest drainage system for patients who underwent pulmonary surgery to reduce the duration of chest tube placement, length of hospital stay and air leak duration.
Clinical Outcomes Following an Initial Experience with a Novel Powered Vascular Stapler in Video-Assisted Thoracoscopic Lobectomies: Results of a Chinese Multi-Center Study

Bin Qiu,Xiaozheng Kang,Ke-Neng Chen,Jian Hu,Jian Li,Liping Zeng,Elliott J. Fegelman,Michael L. Schwiers,Erin E. Creedon,Jason R. Waggoner,Ding,Tengfei Yang,Shugeng Gao

DOI: https://doi.org/10.21037/jtd.2019.04.89

2019-01-01

Journal of Thoracic Disease

Abstract:Background: The development of minimally invasive surgical approaches has revolutionized surgical care and greatly improved surgical outcomes. This study aimed to evaluate the clinical effectiveness of a powered vascular stapler (PVS) during video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) lobectomy. Methods: This prospective, multi-center, post-market clinical study in China enrolled 50 patients with either a suspected or formal diagnosis of clinical stage IA to IIB non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) scheduled for VATS lobectomy. The clinical effectiveness of the PVS for successful pulmonary artery (PA)/ pulmonary vein (PV) transection was evaluated. In addition, the surgeon's stress, device usability, and surgeon satisfaction were measured using multiple questionnaires. Results: A total of 167 PAs/PVs were transected with 3 (1.8%) requiring intra-operative intervention. Fourteen of the 50 patients (28.0%) experienced at least one adverse event (AE), among whom 5 (10.0%) suffered from serious AEs. There were no postoperative hemorrhagic complications related to transection of the PA/PV with PVS. Surgeon satisfaction was surveyed by questionnaire after each of the 50 procedures resulting in a 96% reported satisfaction with device usability, specifically related to a low stress load and an increase in work efficiency. Conclusions: For VATS lobectomy, the PVS demonstrated a positive surgical effectiveness and value in cognitive and physical distress reduction. Complications following VATS lobectomy to treat NSCLC were generally low and as expected. Intraoperative complications were few and there were no postoperative complications related to the transection of the PA and PV during VATS lobectomy. Favorable results were reported on the surgeon satisfaction questionnaire regarding usability and surgeon stress.
Implication of a novel postoperative recovery protocol to increase day 1 discharge rate after anatomic lung resection

Severin Schmid,Mohamad Kaafarani,Gabriele Baldini,Alexander Amir,Florin Costescu,Danielle Shafiepour,Jonathan Cools-Lartigue,Sara Najmeh,Christian Sirois,Lorenzo Ferri,David Mulder,Jonathan Spicer

DOI: https://doi.org/10.21037/jtd-21-965

Abstract:Background: Chest-tube drainage and prolonged air leak after anatomic lung resection (ALR) continue to drive admission days for most programs employing minimal access techniques. The aim of the study was to evaluate the impact of a novel postoperative recovery protocol with revised chest tube management strategies to target discharge on post-operative day 1 (POD1) after ALR. Methods: This is a pilot study investigating a novel enhanced recovery protocol which either allowed chest tube removal on POD1 or ambulatory management with indwelling chest tube using a portable closed drainage system. We included all patients undergoing video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS)-ALR; exclusion criteria were open surgery, non-anatomic or extended resections. Results: A total of 139 patients were included in the study [N=29 portable drainage (PD), N=110 standard pathway (SP)]. POD1 discharge rate was 72% in PD vs. 15% in SP cohort (P<0.001). Median length of stay (LOS) was 1 day [interquartile range (IQR), 1-2 days] in PD cohort, while it was 3 days (IQR, 2-5 days) in SP cohort (P<0.001). There were no significant differences in length of indwelling chest-tube, rate of discharge with chest-tube, post-operative complications, or readmissions. On multivariate analysis, PD pathway as well as short surgical time were significant predictors of discharge on POD1. Conclusions: Our results indicate that POD1 discharge rates of 72% after VATS-ALR can be safely achieved by a well-developed perioperative care pathway and simple chest tube drainage interventions. Based on these findings we are currently drafting a follow-up study to investigate the possibility of performing ALRs as day surgery.
Dissecting aneurysm of the descending aorta. Improved surgical results in 91 patients.

G. Reul,D. Cooley,G. Hallman,S. B. Reddy,E. R. Kyger,D. C. Wukasch

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1001/ARCHSURG.1975.01360110178030

1975-05-01

Archives of Surgery

Abstract:Dissecting aneurysm of the descending thoraic aorta (type iii) is a specific disease process whose pathogenesis, pathologic description, surgical treatment, and prognosis is different from dissections of the ascending arota (types l and ll). From 1964 through 1974, 91 patients underwent surgical correction of type iii dissection. The operative mortality was 21% and late mortality, up to ten years follow-up, was 13%. During the past four years, operative mortality has dropped to 6.5%. Mortality was determined by extent of the aneurysm and underlying cardiac disease. Antihypertensive and negative ionotropic drugs have not been used as definitive treatment but as adjuncts in perioperative support. Based on our present mortality of 6.5%, with no late mortality, we urge early surgical treatment of acute and chronic dissecting aneurysms of the descending thoracic aorta before extension, rupture, or massive enlargement of the aneurysm occurs.
Clinical Application of a Multi-Groove Silicone Drain Combined with Unidirectional Negative-Pressure Drainage System in Single-Operating-port Video-Assisted Thoracoscopic Lung Cancer Surgery: a Comparison Study

Ze Wang,Jian Lv,Si'ang Zhang,Wenjie Chen,Bin Wu,Lei Xue

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0300060521999766

2021-01-01

Journal of International Medical Research

Abstract:Objective To evaluate the effect of a new negative-pressure drainage system in thoracoscopic lung cancer surgery; thereby, providing a new option for postoperative drainage. Methods We retrospectively analyzed data for 200 patients who underwent thoracoscopic surgery between May 2018 and October 2019. According to the thoracic drainage method, the patients were divided into the thoracic tube group and the new system group. The epidemiological and clinicopathological data were compared before operation, and the clinical effect of thoracic drainage was compared after operation. Results There was no significant difference in epidemiological and clinicopathological data between the two groups. There was also no significant difference in drain removal time, hospital stay, and complication rates between the two groups. However, the incidences of pleural effusion and poor incision healing in the new system group were lower than in the thoracic tube group. Visual analog scale (VAS) scores in the new system group were lower than those in the thoracic tube group at each postoperative interval; therefore, the new system group required less analgesia. Conclusion The new system was not inferior to thoracic tubes regarding the drainage effect after thoracoscopic lung cancer surgery. Hence, the system is an alternative to traditional thoracic tubes.
A New Multidimensional Measure of African Adolescents' Perceptions of Teachers' Behaviors

M. Mboya

DOI: https://doi.org/10.2466/PMS.1994.78.2.419

1994-04-01

Perceptual and Motor Skills

Abstract:The Perceived Teacher Behavior Inventory was designed to measure three dimensions of students' perceptions of the behaviors of their teachers. This research was conducted to assess the statistical validity and reliability of the instrument administered to 770 students attending two coeducational high schools in Cape Town, South Africa. Factor analysis clearly identified three subscales indicating that the instrument distinguished the students' perceptions of their teachers' behaviors in three areas. Estimates of internal consistency of the subscales were assessed using the squared multiple correlation as the index of reliability.
Hybrid (Digital/Water Seal) Chest Drainage System – An Innovative Device for Patients with Anticipated Air Leaks

Uyen-Thao Le,Nicolas Hümmler,Frank Greiser,René Tullius-Modlmeier,Marion Benitz,Bernward Passlick

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/15533506241232618

2024-02-27

Surgical Innovation

Abstract:Surgical Innovation, Ahead of Print. BackgroundTo date, several chest drainage systems are available, such as digital drainage systems (DDS) and traditional systems with continuous suction or water seal. However, none of these systems were yet shown to be favorable in the treatment of complex situations such as persistent air leaks or residual spaces. We present in-vitro as well as clinical data of a novel hybrid drainage system consisting of an optimized digital drainage system (ODDS) and an underwater seal drainage system (UWSD).MethodsFor in-vitro analysis, a DDS and an ODDS were connected to a pleural cavity simulator. Different air leaks were produced and data on intrapleural pressure and air flow were analyzed. Furthermore, we tested the hybrid drainage system in 10 patients with potential air leaks after pulmonary surgery.ResultsIn in-vitro analysis, we could show, that with advanced pump technology, pressure fluctuations caused by the drainage system when trying to maintain a set pressure level in patients with airleaks were much smaller when using an ODDS and could even be eliminated when using a fluid collection canister with sufficient buffer capacity. This minimized air leak boosts caused by the drainage system. Optimizing the auto-pressure regulation algorithms also led to a reduced airflow through the fistula and promoted rest. Switching to a passive UWSD also reduced the amount of airflow. Clinical application of the hybrid drainage system yielded promising results.ConclusionThe novel hybrid drainage system shows promising results in the treatment of patients with complex clinical situations such as persistent air leaks.

surgery
Analysis of recombinant DNA using Escherichia coli minicells.

J. Clark-Curtiss,R. Curtiss

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0076-6879(83)01026-5

Methods in Enzymology

Abstract:
Prophylactic air-extraction strategy after thoracoscopic wedge resection

Jia-Tao Zhang,Yi-Chun Tang,Jun-Tao Lin,Song Dong,Qiang Nie,Ben-Yuan Jiang,Hong-Hong Yan,Zheng-Wei Wen,Yue Wu,Xue-Ning Yang,Yi-Long Wu,Wen-Zhao Zhong

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1759-7714.12850

Abstract:Background: Since the conception of enhanced recovery after surgery protocols, tubeless strategies have become popular. Herein, we introduce a previously unreported alternative air-extraction strategy for patients who have undergone thoracoscopic wedge resection and explore its feasibility and safety. Methods: Between January 2015 and June 2017, 264 consecutive patients underwent thoracoscopic wedge resection with different drainage strategies. Patients were divided according to the postoperative drainage strategies used: routine chest tube drainage (RT group), complete omission of chest tube drainage (OT group), and prophylactic air-extraction catheter insertion procedure (PC group). Using the propensity score matching method, clinical parameters and objective operative qualities were compared among the three groups. Results: Optimal 1:1 matching was used to form pairs of RT (n =36) and PC (n =36) groups and balance baseline characteristics among the three groups. The incidence rates of pneumothorax were 5.6% (2/36), 9.8% (5/51), and 19.4% (7/36) in the RT, OT, and PC groups, respectively (P = 0.07). Chest tube reinsertion incidence for postoperative pneumothorax was 19.4% (1/7) in the PC group and 60% (3/5) in the OT group. Other postoperative complications were comparable among these groups. Conclusions: The prophylactic air-extraction strategy may be an alternative procedure for selected patients. Remedial air extraction may reduce the occurrence of chest tube reinsertion for pneumothorax patients, but further investigation is required.
Improving Adherence to Intraoperative Lung-Protective Ventilation Strategies Using Near Real-Time Feedback and Individualized Electronic Reporting

Dale A Parks,Roland T Short,Philip J McArdle,Amandiy Liwo,Joshua M Hagood,Sandra J Crump,Ayesha S Bryant,Thomas R Vetter,Charity J Morgan,T Mark Beasley,Keith A Jones

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1213/ANE.0000000000005481

2021-05-01

Abstract:Background: Postoperative pulmonary complications can have a significant impact on the morbidity and mortality of patients undergoing major surgeries. Intraoperative lung protective strategies using low tidal volume (TV) ventilation and positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) have been demonstrated to reduce the incidence of pulmonary injury and infection while improving oxygenation and respiratory mechanics. The purpose of this study was to develop decision support systems designed to optimize behavior of the attending anesthesiologist with regards to adherence with established intraoperative lung-protective ventilation (LPV) strategies. Methods: Over a 4-year period, data were obtained from 49,386 procedures and 109 attendings. Cases were restricted to patients aged 18 years or older requiring general anesthesia that lasted at least 60 minutes. We defined protective lung ventilation as a TV of 6-8 mL/kg ideal body weight and a PEEP of ≥4 cm H2O. There was a baseline period followed by 4 behavioral interventions: education, near real-time feedback, individualized post hoc feedback, and enhanced multidimensional decision support. Segmented logistic regression using generalized estimating equations was performed in order to assess temporal trends and effects of interventions on adherence to LPV strategies. Results: Consistent with improvement in adherence with LPV strategies during the baseline period, the predicted probability of adherence with LPV at the end of baseline was 0.452 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.422-0.483). The improvements observed for each phase were relative to the preceding phase. Education alone was associated with an 8.7% improvement (P < .01) in adherence to lung-protective protocols and was associated with a 16% increase in odds of adherence (odds ratio [OR] = 1.16; 95% CI, 1.01-1.33; P = .04). Near real-time, on-screen feedback was associated with an estimated 15.5% improvement in adherence (P < .01) with a 69% increase in odds of adherence (OR = 1.69; 95% CI, 1.46-1.96; P < .01) over education alone. The addition of an individualized dashboard with personal adherence and peer comparison was associated with a significant improvement over near real-time feedback (P < .01). Near real-time feedback and dashboard feedback systems were enhanced based on feedback from the in-room attendings, and this combination was associated with an 18.1% (P < .01) increase in adherence with a 2-fold increase in the odds of adherence (OR = 2.23; 95% CI, 1.85-2.69; P < .0001) between the end of the previous on-screen feedback phase and the start of the individualized post hoc dashboard reporting phase. The adherence with lung-protective strategies using the multidimensional approach has been sustained for over 24 months. The difference between the end of the previous phase and the start of this last enhanced multidimensional decision support phase was not significant (OR = 1.08; 95% CI, 0.86-1.34; P = .48). Conclusions: Consistent with the literature, near real-time and post hoc reporting are associated with positive and sustained behavioral changes aimed at adopting evidence-based clinical strategies. Many decision support systems have demonstrated impact to behavior, but the effect is often transient. The implementation of near real-time feedback and individualized post hoc decision support tools has resulted in clinically relevant improvements in adherence with LPV strategies that have been sustained for over 24 months, a common limitation of decision support solutions.
The impact of enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocol compliance on morbidity from resection for primary lung cancer

Luke J. Rogers,David Bleetman,David E. Messenger,Natasha A. Joshi,Lesley Wood,Neil J. Rasburn,Timothy J.P. Batchelor

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtcvs.2017.10.151

2018-04-01

Abstract:OBJECTIVE: The adoption of Enhanced Recovery After Surgery programs in thoracic surgery is relatively recent with limited outcome data. This study aimed to determine the impact of an Enhanced Recovery After Surgery pathway on morbidity and length of stay in patients undergoing lung resection for primary lung cancer.METHODS: This prospective cohort study collected data on consecutive patients undergoing lung resection for primary lung cancer between April 2012 and June 2014 at a regional referral center in the United Kingdom. All patients followed a standardized, 15-element Enhanced Recovery After Surgery protocol. Key data fields included protocol compliance with individual elements, pathophysiology, and operative factors. Thirty-day morbidity was taken as the primary outcome measure and classified a priori according to the Clavien-Dindo system. Logistic regression models were devised to identify independent risk factors for morbidity and length of stay.RESULTS: A total of 422 consecutive patients underwent lung resection over a 2-year period, of whom 302 (71.6%) underwent video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery. Lobectomy was performed in 297 patients (70.4%). Complications were experienced by 159 patients (37.6%). The median length of stay was 5 days (range, 1-67), and 6 patients (1.4%) died within 30 days of surgery. There was a significant inverse relationship between protocol compliance and morbidity after adjustment for confounding factors (odds ratio, 0.72; 95% confidence interval, 0.57-0.91; P < .01). Age, lobectomy or pneumonectomy, more than 1 resection, and delayed mobilization were independent predictors of morbidity. Age, lack of preoperative carbohydrate drinks, planned high dependency unit/intensive therapy unit admission, delayed mobilization, and open approach were independent predictors of delayed discharge (length of stay >5 days).CONCLUSIONS: Increased compliance with an Enhanced Recovery After Surgery pathway is associated with improved clinical outcomes after resection for primary lung cancer. Several elements, including early mobilization, appear to be more influential than others.
Implementation of an enhanced recovery protocol for lung volume reduction surgery: an observational cohort study

Christelle M Vandervelde,Stephanie Everaerts,Walter Weder,Siebe Orolé,Pieter-Jan Hermans,Paul De Leyn,Philippe Nafteux,Herbert Decaluwé,Hans Van Veer,Lieven Depypere,Steve Coppens,Arne P Neyrinck,Sofian Bouneb,Johan De Coster,Johan Coolen,Christophe Dooms,Dirk E Van Raemdonck,Wim Janssens,Laurens J Ceulemans

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/ejcts/ezae109

IF: 4.534

2024-03-20

European Journal of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery

Abstract:Abstract OBJECTIVES Lung volume reduction surgery (LVRS) is an established therapeutic option for advanced emphysema. To improve patients’ safety and reduce complications, an enhanced recovery protocol (ERP) was implemented. This study aims to describe and evaluate the short-term outcome of this ERP. METHODS This retrospective single-center study included all consecutive LVRS patients (January 1st, 2017 until September 15th, 2020). An ERP for LVRS was implemented and stepwise optimized from August 1st, 2019, it consisted of changes in pre-, peri- and postoperative care pathways. Patients were compared before and after implementation of ERP. Primary outcome was incidence of postoperative complications (Clavien-Dindo), secondary outcomes included chest tube duration, incidence of prolonged air leak (PAL), length-of-stay and 90-day mortality. Lung function and exercise capacity were evaluated at 3- and 6-months post-LVRS. RESULTS Seventy-six LVRS patients were included (pre-ERP: n = 41, ERP: n = 35). The ERP cohort presented with lower incidence of postoperative complications (42% vs 83%, p = 0.0002), shorter chest tube duration (4 days vs 12 days, p < 0.0001) with a lower incidence of PAL (21% vs 61%, p = 0.0005) and shorter length-of-stay (6 days vs 14 days, p < 0.0001). No in-hospital mortality occurred in the ERP cohort vs 4 pre-ERP. Postoperative FEV1 was higher in the ERP cohort compared to pre-ERP at 3 months (1.35 L vs 1.02 L) and at 6 months (1.31 L vs 1.01 L). CONCLUSIONS Implementation of ERP as part of a comprehensive reconceptualization towards LVRS, demonstrated fewer postoperative complications, including PAL, resulting in reduced length-of-stay. Improved short-term functional outcomes were observed at 3- and 6 months.

surgery,cardiac & cardiovascular systems,respiratory system
Tubeless single-port thoracoscopic sublobar resection: indication and safety

Chao-Yu Liu,Po-Kuei Hsu,Hung-Che Chien,Chih-Cheng Hsieh,Chien-Kun Ting,Mei-Yung Tsou

DOI: https://doi.org/10.21037/jtd.2018.05.119

Abstract:Background: The tubeless technique, defined as non-intubated general anesthesia with omission of chest drainage after video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS), is a new concept to further minimize surgical trauma. However, there has been little investigation into the associated feasibility and safety. Minimization of postoperative pneumothorax is challenging. We set up a "tubeless protocol" to select patients for tubeless single-port VATS with monitoring of a digital drainage system (DDS). Methods: From November 2016 to September 2017, 50 consecutive non-intubated single-port VATS for pulmonary resection were performed. In our study, patients with small and peripheral pulmonary lesions indicated for sublobar resections, as diagnostic or curative intent, were included. After excluding patients having tumors >2 cm, or intrapleural adhesions noted during operation, or forced expiratory volume in the 1 second <1.5 L, 36 patients were selected for tubeless protocol. The clinical characteristics and perioperative outcomes of these patients are presented. Results: Among 36 cases, 5 patients had minor air leaks detected using the DDS and required intercostal drainage after wound closure. Among the remaining 31 patients in whom the DDS showed no air leak, the chest drainage was removed immediately after wound closure. A postoperative chest roentgenogram on the surgery day showed full expansion in all patients without pneumothorax. Only 7 (19.4%) patients developed minor subclinical pneumothorax on the first postoperative day without the need for chest drainage. All patients were discharged uneventfully without the need for intervention. Conclusions: Our tubeless protocol utilizes DDS to select patients who can have intercostal drainage omitted after non-intubated single-port VATS for pulmonary resection. Using objective DDS parameters, we believe that this is an effective way to reduce the rate of pneumothorax after tubeless single-port VATS in selected patients.
Video- assisted thoracoscopic lung resection with or without enhanced recovery after surgery: a single institution, prospective randomized controlled study

Yi Ding,Leiming Zhou,Lei Shan,Weiquan Zhang,Peichao Li,Bo Cong,Zhongxian Tian,Yunpeng Zhao,Xiaogang Zhao

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2024.1474438

IF: 4.7

2024-11-09

Frontiers in Oncology

Abstract:Purpose: This study was conducted to evaluate the postoperative short-term outcomes of patients undergoing video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) for lung resection with the enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocol. Methods: A single-institution, prospective randomized controlled study was conducted. The primary outcome measures were postoperative pulmonary complications (PPCs) and postoperative short-term effects. Results: Among the 611 patients, 305 were assigned to the ERAS group, and 306 were assigned to the routine group. The ERAS group achieved earlier oral feeding, earlier mobilization, a shorter duration of drainage (2.0 vs. 5.0 days, P<0.001), and a shorter hospital stay (3.0 vs. 7.0 days, P<0.001). The biological impacts were confirmed to be significantly better for the ERAS group. Furthermore, the ERAS group also had a lower incidence of PPCs (11.5% vs. 22.9%, P<0.001) than did the routine group. Multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed the following predictors of drainage tube removal on the 1st day after surgery without pneumonia during hospitalization: comorbidity (P=0.029), surgical procedure (P=0.001), and operation time (P=0.039). Conclusions: Implementation of the ERAS protocol led to a decreased incidence of PPCs, suggesting that the ERAS protocol has a better biological impact on patients undergoing VATS for lung resection. Multigradient individual ERAS protocols are recommended at different institutions according to the individual conditions of patients. Clinical Trial Registration: https://register.clinicaltrials.gov/prs/app/action/SelectProtocol?sid=S0009ZT9&selectaction=Edit&uid=U0002ZGN&ts=3&cx=ks7hrg, identifier NCT04451473.

oncology
Loss-of-Resistance Versus Dynamic Pressure-Sensing Technology for Successful Placement of Thoracic Epidural Catheters: A Randomized Clinical Trial

Yatish S Ranganath,Vendhan Ramanujam,Qasim Al-Hassan,Zita Sibenaller,Melinda S Seering,Tejinder Singh Swaran Singh,Sangini Punia,Michelle C Parra,Cynthia A Wong,Rakesh V Sondekoppam,Yatish S. Ranganath,Melinda S. Seering,Michelle C. Parra,Cynthia A. Wong,Rakesh V. Sondekoppam

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1213/ane.0000000000006792

IF: 6.627

2024-01-08

Anesthesia & Analgesia

Abstract:BACKGROUND: The traditional loss-of-resistance (LOR) technique for thoracic epidural catheter placement can be associated with a high primary failure rate. In this study, we compared the traditional LOR technique and dynamic pressure-sensing (DPS) technology for primary success rate and secondary outcomes pertinent to identifying the thoracic epidural space. METHODS: This pragmatic, randomized, patient- and assessor-blinded superiority trial enrolled patients ages 18 to 75 years, scheduled for major thoracic or abdominal surgeries at a tertiary care teaching hospital. Anesthesiology trainees (residents and fellows) placed thoracic epidural catheters under faculty supervision and rescue. The primary outcome was the success rate of thoracic epidural catheter placement, evaluated by the loss of cold sensation in the thoracic dermatomes 20 minutes after injecting the epidural test dose. Secondary outcomes included procedural time, ease of catheter placement, the presence of a positive falling meniscus sign, early hemodynamic changes, and unintended dural punctures. Additionally, we explored outcomes that included number of attempts, needle depth to epidural space, need for faculty to rescue the procedure from the trainee, patient-rated procedural discomfort, pain at the epidural insertion site, postoperative pain scores, and opioid consumption over 48 hours. RESULTS: Between March 2019 and June 2020, 133 patients were enrolled; 117 were included in the final analysis (n = 57 for the LOR group; n = 60 for the DPS group). The primary success rate of epidural catheter placement was 91.2% (52 of 57) in the LOR group and 96.7% (58 of 60) in the DPS group (95% confidence interval [CI] of difference in proportions: −0.054 [−0.14 to 0.03]; P = .264). No difference was observed in procedural time between the 2 groups (median interquartile range [IQR] in minutes: LOR 5.0 [7.0], DPS 5.5 [7.0]; P = .982). The number of patients with epidural analgesia onset at 10 minutes was 49.1% (28 of 57) in the LOR group compared to 31.7% (19 of 60) in the DPS group ( P = .062). There were 2 cases of unintended dural punctures in each group. Other secondary or exploratory outcomes were not significantly different between the groups. CONCLUSIONS: Our trial did not establish the superiority of the DPS technique over the traditional LOR method for identifying the thoracic epidural space (Clinicaltrials.gov identifier: NCT03826186).

anesthesiology
Prospective Implementation of Enhanced Recovery After Surgery Protocols to Radical Cystectomy

Karl H Pang,Ruth Groves,Suresh Venugopal,Aidan P Noon,James W F Catto

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2017.07.031

Abstract:Background: Multimodal enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) regimens have improved outcomes from colorectal surgery. Objective: We report the application of ERAS to patients undergoing radical cystectomy (RC). Design, setting, and participants: Prospective collection of outcomes from consecutive patients undergoing RC at a single institution. Intervention: Twenty-six components including prehabilitation exercise, same day admission, carbohydrate fluid loading, targeted intraoperative fluid resuscitation, regional local anaesthesia, cessation of nasogastric tubes, omitting oral bowel preparation, avoiding drain use, early mobilisation, chewing gum use, and audit. Outcome measurements and statistical analysis: Primary outcomes were length of stay and readmission rate. Secondary outcomes included intraoperative blood loss, transfusion rates, survival, and histopathological findings. Results and limitations: Four hundred and fifty-three consecutive patients underwent RC, including 393 (87%) with ERAS. Length of stay was shorter with ERAS (median [interquartile range]: 8 [6-13] d) than without (18 [13-25], p<0.001). Patients with ERAS had lower blood loss (ERAS: 600 [383-969] ml vs 1050 [900-1575] ml for non-ERAS, p<0.001), lower transfusion rates (ERAS: 8.1% vs 25%, chi-square test, p<0.001), and fewer readmissions (ERAS: 15% vs 25%, chi-square test, p=0.04) than those without. Histopathological parameters (eg, tumour stage, node count, and margin state) and survival outcomes did not differ with ERAS use (all p>0.1). Multivariable analysis revealed ERAS use was (p=0.002) independently associated with length of stay. Conclusions: The use of ERAS pathways was associated with lower intraoperative blood loss and faster discharge for patients undergoing RC. These changes did not increase readmission rates or alter oncological outcomes. Patient summary: Recovery after major bladder surgery can be improved by using enhanced recovery pathways. Patients managed by these pathways have shorter length of stays, lower blood loss, and lower transfusion rates. Their adoption should be encouraged.

[Perinatal period. b. Prenatal diagnosis by genetic analysis].

Clinical application of a digital thoracic drainage system for objectifying and quantifying air leak versus the traditional vacuum system: a retrospective observational study

Digital Chest Drainage System Versus Traditional Chest Drainage System after Pulmonary Resection: a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Anatomic Lung Resection Outcomes After Implementation of a Universal Thoracic ERAS Protocol Across a Diverse Healthcare System

Anatomic Lung Resection Outcomes After Implementation of a Universal Thoracic ERAS Protocol Across a Diverse Health Care System

Digital chest drainage is better than traditional chest drainage following pulmonary surgery: a meta-analysis.

Clinical Outcomes Following an Initial Experience with a Novel Powered Vascular Stapler in Video-Assisted Thoracoscopic Lobectomies: Results of a Chinese Multi-Center Study

Implication of a novel postoperative recovery protocol to increase day 1 discharge rate after anatomic lung resection

Dissecting aneurysm of the descending aorta. Improved surgical results in 91 patients.

Clinical Application of a Multi-Groove Silicone Drain Combined with Unidirectional Negative-Pressure Drainage System in Single-Operating-port Video-Assisted Thoracoscopic Lung Cancer Surgery: a Comparison Study

A New Multidimensional Measure of African Adolescents' Perceptions of Teachers' Behaviors

Hybrid (Digital/Water Seal) Chest Drainage System – An Innovative Device for Patients with Anticipated Air Leaks

Analysis of recombinant DNA using Escherichia coli minicells.

Prophylactic air-extraction strategy after thoracoscopic wedge resection

Improving Adherence to Intraoperative Lung-Protective Ventilation Strategies Using Near Real-Time Feedback and Individualized Electronic Reporting

The impact of enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocol compliance on morbidity from resection for primary lung cancer

Implementation of an enhanced recovery protocol for lung volume reduction surgery: an observational cohort study

Tubeless single-port thoracoscopic sublobar resection: indication and safety

Video- assisted thoracoscopic lung resection with or without enhanced recovery after surgery: a single institution, prospective randomized controlled study

Loss-of-Resistance Versus Dynamic Pressure-Sensing Technology for Successful Placement of Thoracic Epidural Catheters: A Randomized Clinical Trial

Prospective Implementation of Enhanced Recovery After Surgery Protocols to Radical Cystectomy