Comparison Of Surgical Approach And Extent Of Resection For Masaoka-Koga Stage I And Ii Thymic Tumours In Europe, North America And Asia: An International Thymic Malignancy Interest Group Retrospective Database Analysis

Wentao Fang,Xiaopan Yao,Alberto Antonicelli,Zhitao Gu,Frank Detterbeck,Eric Vallieres,Ralph W. Aye,Alexander S. Farivar,James Huang,Yue Shang,Brian E. Louie
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/ejcts/ezx042
IF: 4.534
2017-01-01
European Journal of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery
Abstract:OBJECTIVES: Surgeons at different institutions worldwide choose different types of operations for thymic tumours. It is not known whether these differences affect the outcomes of the patients.METHODS: A total of 1430 patients with Masaoka-Koga pathological Stage I-II thymic tumours without myasthenia gravis or pre-treatment were identified from the International Thymic Malignancy Interest Group retrospective database. Outcomes of patients from 3 major continents (Europe, North America and Asia) were compared.RESULTS: Patients from the 3 continents were comparable in gender and performance status. More European patients had more paraneoplastic syndromes; North American patients had the smallest tumour sizes and less adjuvant therapy; and Asian patients were younger and had more Stage I disease but higher grade tumours. Partial thymectomy was performed more often in Asian patients (31.7%) than in European (2.4%) and North American (5.4%; P < 0.001) patients. The median approach (sternotomy/clamshell) was the major approach in Europe (75.3%) and North America (76.6%). In contrast, the median approach was applied significantly less frequently in Asia (45.6%, P < 0.001); unilateral open (thoracotomy/hemi-clamshell, 23.3%) and minimally invasive approaches (video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery/robot, 31.1%) were used more often with similar rates of complete resection. The 10-year overall survival rate was 82% for Europe, 78% for North America and 90% for Asia (P = 0.005), respectively. The 10-year cumulative recurrence rates were similar among the geographic groups (European 0.08, North American 0.07, and Asian 0.06, P = 0.61). Age was the only independent predictive factor for overall survival (P < 0.001, HR = 1.089, 95% CI 1.056-1.123) in multivariable analysis. Types B3 and thymic carcinoma (P = 0.003, HR = 3.932, 95% CI 1.615-9.576) were independent risk factors for increased recurrence.CONCLUSIONS: This study shows that the selection of the surgical approach and the extent of resection for Stage I and II thymic tumours differ by geographic region. However, these differences seem to have little impact on outcomes.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?