Abstract:The networked architecture of the brain promotes synchrony among neuronal populations and the emergence of coherent dynamics. These communication patterns can be comprehensively mapped using noninvasive functional imaging, resulting in functional connectivity (FC) networks. Despite its popularity, FC is a statistical construct and its operational definition is arbitrary. While most studies use zero-lag Pearson’s correlations by default, there exist hundreds of pairwise interaction statistics in the broader scientific literature that can be used to estimate FC. How the organization of the FC matrix varies with the choice of pairwise statistic is a fundamental methodological question that affects all studies in this rapidly growing field. Here we comprehensively benchmark the topological and geometric organization, neurobiological associations, and cognitive-behavioral relevance of FC matrices computed using a large library of 239 pairwise interaction statistics. We comprehensively investigate how canonical features of FC networks vary with the choice of pairwise statistic, including (1) hub mapping, (2) weight-distance trade-offs, (3) structure–function coupling, (4) correspondence with other neurophysiological networks, (5) individual fingerprinting, and (6) brain–behavior prediction. We find substantial quantitative and qualitative variation across FC methods. Throughout, we observe that measures such as covariance (full correlation), precision (partial correlation) and distance display multiple desirable properties, including close correspondence with structural connectivity, the capacity to differentiate individuals and to predict individual differences in behavior. Using information flow decomposition, we find that differences among FC methods may arise from differential sensitivity to the underlying mechanisms of inter-regional communication, with some more sensitive to redundant and some to synergistic information flow. In summary, our report highlights the importance of tailoring a pairwise statistic to a specific neurophysiological mechanism and research question, providing a blueprint for future studies to optimize their choice of FC method.

Dissociating Group and Individual Profile of Functional Connectivity Using Low Rank Matrix Recovery.

Dissociating Individual Connectome Traits Using Low-Rank Learning.

Brain fingerprinting and cognitive behavior predicting using functional connectome of high inter-subject variability

Low-Rank Learning Of Functional Connectivity Reveals Neural Traits Of Individual Differences

Decomposition of individual-specific and individual-shared components from resting-state functional connectivity using a multi-task machine learning method

Functional Connectivity Network Estimation with an Inter-Similarity Prior for Mild Cognitive Impairment Classification

Adaptive Weight and Wasserstein Distance Constrained Low-Rank Sparse Representation Method for Functional Connectivity Network Estimation

Benchmarking methods for mapping functional connectivity in the brain

Nodal Memberships to Communities of Functional Brain Networks Reveal Functional Flexibility and Individualized Connectome

Extracting information from functional connectivity maps via function-on-scalar regression.

Rich-club organization of whole-brain spatio-temporal multilayer functional connectivity networks

Latent functional connectivity underlying multiple brain states

Quantifying the influence of biophysical factors in shaping brain communication through remnant functional networks

Rest2Task: Modeling task-specific components in resting-state functional connectivity and applications

Manifold Learning of Dynamic Functional Connectivity Reliably Identifies Functionally Consistent Coupling Patterns in Human Brains.

Functional Connectivity Pattern Underlies Individual Differences in Independent Self-Construal

Characterizing Dynamic Functional Connectivity In The Resting Brain Using Variable Parameter Regression And Kalman Filtering Approaches

Graph Theory Based Multi-level Cortical Functional Connectivity Developmental Analysis

A whole‐brain modeling approach to identify individual and group variations in functional connectivity

Evaluating the Strength of Functional Connectivity During the Resting State

Dynamic Functional Connectivity Revealed by Resting-State Functional Near-Infrared Spectroscopy