A systematic evaluation of dynamic functional connectivity methods using simulation data
Binke Yuan,Junjie Yang,Xiaolin Guo,Xiaowei Gao,Zhe Hu,Junjing Li,Jiaxuan Liu,Yaling Wang,Zhiheng Qu,Wanchun Li,Zhongqi Li,Wanjing Li,Yien Huang,Jiali Chen,Hao Wen,Junle Li,Dong-Qiang Liu,Hui Xie
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.07.09.600728
2024-07-13
Abstract:Numerous dynamic functional connectivity (dFC) methods have been proposed to study time-resolved network reorganization in rest and task fMRI. However, a comprehensive comparison of their performance is lacking. In this study, we compared the efficacy of seven dFC methods (and their enhanced versions) to track transient network reconfiguration using simulation data. The seven methods include flexible least squares (FLS), dynamic conditional correlation (DCC), general linear Kalman filter (GLKF), multiplication of temporal derivatives (MTD), sliding-window functional connectivity with L1-regularization (SWFC), hidden Markov models (HMM), and hidden semi-Markov models (HSMM). Multiple datasets of non-fMRI-BOLD and fMRI-BOLD signals with predefined covariance structures, signal-to-noise ratio levels, and sojourn time distributions were simulated. We adopted inter-subject analysis to eliminate the effects of signals of non-interest, resulting in enhanced methods: ISSWFC, ISMTD, ISDCC, ISFLS, ISKF, ISHMM, and ISHSMM. Efficacy was defined as the spatiotemporal association between simulated and estimated data. We found that all enhanced dFC methods outperformed their original versions. Efficacies depend on several factors, such as considering the neurovascular effect in simulated data, the covariance structure between two time series, state sojourn distribution, and signal-to-noise ratio levels. These results highlight the importance of selecting appropriate dFC methods in fMRI study.
Neuroscience