Study on the feasibility of thoracic drainage with central venous catheter after uniportal video-assisted thoracoscopic bullectomy

yang bo,li xiaoping,yan xiaolong,wang wenchen,li lei,zhang liang,li mingjiang,zhang weidong
DOI: https://doi.org/10.11958/20180777
2018-01-01
Abstract:Objective To investigate the validity, security, feasibility and superiority of the clinical application of central venous catheter instead of traditional thoracic drainage tube in uniportal video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery(UVATS) based on the concept of enhanced recovery after surgery(ERAS).Methods The clinical data of 194 patients who underwent spontaneous pneumothorax in the Tianjin First Central Hospital from June 2013 to November 2016 were included in this study. Patients were divided into central venous catheter group(CVC group) and 28 F polyvinylchlorid chest tube group(28 F group), 97 cases in each group. Clinical effects, chest drainage volume and related complications were compared between the two groups.Results The hospital stay[(3.4±1.1) d vs.(5.9±1.7) d], leave-bed time after operation[(4.7±0.7)h vs.(11.5±2.5) h]and remove drainage tube time[(34.9±5.4) h vs.(72.3±9.8) h]were significantly less in CVC group than those of 28 F group(P<0.05). The pain score(3.1±1.4 vs. 7.0±2.5) and incidence of poor wound healing of drainage(100% vs. 93.8%) were also less in CVC group than those of 28 F group(P<0.05). There were no significant differences in the complication of lung infection(1.0% vs. 3.1%), subcutaneous emphysema(4.1% vs. 2.1%) and persistent leakage(1.0% vs.3.1%) between the two groups.Conclusion The application of the central venous catheter technology in uniportal video-assisted thoracoscopic bullectomy is superior to the traditional thoracic drainage, and which is worthy of clinical promotion.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?