[A case for diagnosis: erosive pustular dermatosis of the scalp].

F. Loche,P. Bayle‐Lebey,M. Marguery,H. Raynal,J. Bazex

IF: 0.934

Annales de Dermatologie et de Vénéréologie

Abstract:

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

Suction Versus Non-Suction Drainage Strategy after Uniportal Thoracoscopic Lung Surgery: a Prospective Cohort Study

Yang Qiu,Jian Zhou,Dongsheng Wu,Ailin Luo,Mei Yang,Quan Zheng,Tengyong Wang,Qiang Pu

DOI: https://doi.org/10.21037/jtd-23-1852

2024-01-01

Journal of Thoracic Disease

Abstract:Background:The postoperative outcomes of suction drainage versus non-suction drainage after uniportal video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (UniVATS) come with little consensus. This study aimed to prospectively compare the postoperative outcomes of suction drainage versus non-suction drainage in patients who underwent UniVATS.Methods:Between October 2022 and January 2023, patients undergoing UniVATS were prospectively enrolled. The choice of drainage strategy (suction or non-suction) was at the surgeon's discretion. The primary outcome was chest tube duration, with secondary outcomes including postoperative drainage volume, pain scores, postoperative complications, length of hospital stay, and hospitalization cost. Baseline characteristics and postoperative outcomes were compared. Univariable and multivariable analyses were used to identify risk factors for postoperative outcomes.Results:A total of 206 patients were enrolled in this study, with 103 patients in each group. Baseline characteristics were well-balanced. The chest tube duration did not significantly differ between the two groups. However, suction drainage exhibited a significantly lower total drainage volume compared to non-suction drainage (280.00 vs. 400.00 mL, P=0.03). Suction drainage was associated with a significantly shorter postoperative hospital stay (3.00 vs. 4.00 days, P<0.001) and lower pain score on the second postoperative day (POD). Multivariable analyses also confirmed that suction drainage was significantly correlated with a lower total drainage volume and a shorter postoperative hospital stay.Conclusions:These findings suggested that the suction drainage was superior to non-suction drainage in terms of postoperative drainage volume and length of hospital stay in patients undergoing UniVATS.
Is tubeless uniportal video-assisted thoracic surgery for pulmonary wedge resection a safe procedure?

Chao-Yu Liu,Po-Kuei Hsu,Ka-I Leong,Chien-Kun Ting,Mei-Yung Tsou

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/ejcts/ezaa061

2020-03-17

Abstract:Abstract OBJECTIVES Tubeless uniportal video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS), using a uniportal approach and non-intubated anaesthesia while avoiding postoperative chest drain insertion, for patients undergoing thoracoscopic surgery has been demonstrated to be feasible in selected cases. However, to date, the safety of the procedure has not been studied. METHODS We reviewed consecutive patients undergoing non-intubated uniportal VATS for pulmonary wedge resection at 2 medical centres between August 2016 and October 2019. The decision to avoid chest drain insertion was made in selected candidates. For those candidates in whom a tubeless procedure was performed, postoperative chest X-rays (CXRs) were taken on the day of the surgery [operation (OP) day], on postoperative day 1 and 1–2 weeks later. The factors associated with abnormal CXR findings were studied. RESULTS Among 135 attempts to avoid chest drain insertion, 13 (9.6%) patients ultimately required a postoperative chest drain. Among 122 patients in which a tubeless procedure was performed, 26 (21.3%) and 47 (38.5%) had abnormal CXR findings on OP day and postoperative day 1, respectively. Among them, 3 (2.5%) patients developed clinically significant abnormal CXRs and required intercostal drainage. Primary spontaneous pneumothorax was independently associated with a higher risk of postoperative abnormal CXRs. CONCLUSIONS Tubeless uniportal VATS for pulmonary wedge resection can be safely performed in selected patients. Most patients with postoperative abnormal CXRs presented subclinical symptoms that spontaneously resolved; only 2.5% of patients with postoperative abnormal CXRs required drainage.

surgery,cardiac & cardiovascular systems,respiratory system
Pharyngeal dysfunction after treatment for pharyngeal cancer with surgery and radiotherapy

O. Ekberg,G. Nylander

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01948099

Gastrointestinal Radiology

Abstract:
Tubeless single-port thoracoscopic sublobar resection: indication and safety

Chao-Yu Liu,Po-Kuei Hsu,Hung-Che Chien,Chih-Cheng Hsieh,Chien-Kun Ting,Mei-Yung Tsou

DOI: https://doi.org/10.21037/jtd.2018.05.119

Abstract:Background: The tubeless technique, defined as non-intubated general anesthesia with omission of chest drainage after video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS), is a new concept to further minimize surgical trauma. However, there has been little investigation into the associated feasibility and safety. Minimization of postoperative pneumothorax is challenging. We set up a "tubeless protocol" to select patients for tubeless single-port VATS with monitoring of a digital drainage system (DDS). Methods: From November 2016 to September 2017, 50 consecutive non-intubated single-port VATS for pulmonary resection were performed. In our study, patients with small and peripheral pulmonary lesions indicated for sublobar resections, as diagnostic or curative intent, were included. After excluding patients having tumors >2 cm, or intrapleural adhesions noted during operation, or forced expiratory volume in the 1 second <1.5 L, 36 patients were selected for tubeless protocol. The clinical characteristics and perioperative outcomes of these patients are presented. Results: Among 36 cases, 5 patients had minor air leaks detected using the DDS and required intercostal drainage after wound closure. Among the remaining 31 patients in whom the DDS showed no air leak, the chest drainage was removed immediately after wound closure. A postoperative chest roentgenogram on the surgery day showed full expansion in all patients without pneumothorax. Only 7 (19.4%) patients developed minor subclinical pneumothorax on the first postoperative day without the need for chest drainage. All patients were discharged uneventfully without the need for intervention. Conclusions: Our tubeless protocol utilizes DDS to select patients who can have intercostal drainage omitted after non-intubated single-port VATS for pulmonary resection. Using objective DDS parameters, we believe that this is an effective way to reduce the rate of pneumothorax after tubeless single-port VATS in selected patients.
A Novel Tubeless Urinary Catheter Protocol Enhanced Recovery after Minimally Invasive Lung Surgery

Weidong Wang,Pinghui Xia,Liang Pan,Jinming Xu,Wang Lv,Jian Hu

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fsurg.2020.584578

IF: 1.8

2020-01-01

Frontiers in Surgery

Abstract:Objectives: Although previous studies have shown the feasibility of non-intubated techniques, it is unknown whether avoiding urinary catheters can enhance recovery. This study aimed to determine whether the tubeless urinary catheter protocol is feasible and beneficial for minimally invasive lung surgery. Methods: Patients were randomized to the control group, completely tubeless group, and partially tubeless group. A propensity score-matched (PSM) analysis was performed to balance the non-random baseline characteristics. Complications and postoperative recovery were compared. Regression analysis was performed to identify the independent predictors of complications. A nomogram for predicting the risk of non-automatic micturition was constructed and internally validated. Results: One hundred fifty-nine patients were enrolled. The incidence rates of urinary irritation and urinary tract infection (UTI) were significantly lower in the tubeless groups (74.4 vs. 39.5%, p < 0.001; 28.2 vs. 8.6%, p = 0.001, respectively). The tubeless group had a higher proportion of 0-degree discomfort (81.5 vs. 30.8%, p = 0.001) and shorter duration of postoperative hospital stay than the control group (4.59 vs. 5.53 days, p < 0.001). No difference was observed in terms of urination retention and urinary incontinence between the tubeless group and the control group. After PSM, the advantages of the tubeless group still existed, and comparing to the partially tubeless group, the completely tubeless group was of even less UTI and more 0-degree discomfort (18.5 vs. 0.0%, p = 0.019; 96.3 vs. 59.3%, p = 0.002). The tubeless protocol was the only independent protective factor of urinary complications. A nomogram was constructed and showed good predictive ability. Conclusions: The tubeless catheterization protocol led to fewer complications, better compliance, and shorter hospital length of stay. The advantages were more significant with the completely tubeless protocol. The utility of our nomogram can assist clinicians in avoiding risks in performing the tubeless protocol.
A Novel Drainage Strategy Using Chest Tube Plus Pleural Catheter in Uniportal Upper Lobectomy: A Randomized Study

Fu Yang,Xing Wang,Honglei Xu,Beatrice Aramini,Yuming Zhu,Gening Jiang,Jiang Fan

DOI: https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-1635613/v1

2022-01-01

Abstract:Abstract Objective: We aims to explored whether one pleural catheter plus single chest tube drainage, may achieve a non-inferior drainage effect when compared to the traditional two chest tubes in uniportal video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) for an upper pulmonary lobectomy. Methods: Patients that underwent an upper pulmonary lobectomy from January to November 2020 were enrolled in this single-center, randomized, open-label, non-inferiority trial. Prior to closure, patients randomized to an intervention group received an improved drainage strategy involving one pleural catheter with one chest tube (24Fr), while traditional double-chest-tube drainage was applied for the control group. Results: A total of 390 patients entered the study, though 190 were excluded for changing non-uniportal surgical approaches or opting for non-lobectomy resections. Finally, 200 patients were randomized (100 in intervention group and 100 in control group). The baseline demographic and clinical characteristics were comparable between the groups. The incidence of pneumothorax in the intervention and control groups was similar on postoperative day 1 (non-inferiority, 10% vs. 13%, P = 0.658). In addition, there were no significant differences in secondary outcomes like incidence of pneumothorax by day 30, postoperative chest tube/pleural catheter removal time, amount of drainage on day 1, total amount of drainage after operation, or postoperative hospitalization. A significantly lower pain score was observed in the intervention group (3.33±0.68 vs. 3.68±0.94, P = 0.003).Conclusions: The new strategy is non-inferior to double-chest-tube drainage after an upper pulmonary lobectomy, offers superior pain control, and is recommended for an upper lobectomy by uniportal VATS. Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04461652, 8th /07/2020.
Suction Versus Nonsuction Drainage After Uniportal Video-Assisted Thoracoscopic Surgery: A Propensity Score-Matched Study

Jian Zhou,Chuan Li,Quan Zheng,Chenglin Guo,Mengyuan Lyu,Qiang Pu,Hu Liao,Lunxu Liu

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2021.751396

IF: 4.7

2021-10-26

Frontiers in Oncology

Abstract:Background Uniportal video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (UniVATS) was utilized with a rapid growth. The evidence is sparse, however, on whether to add external suction to water-seal drainage for chest drainage after UniVATS. This retrospective propensity score-matched study aimed to identify the necessity of adding external suction to chest drainage after UniVATS. Methods Patients with lung cancer who underwent UniVATS were included from our prospectively maintained database. Patients were divided into two cohorts based on the addition of external suction to postoperative water-seal drainage or not. Propensity score-matched analysis was performed to identify the impact of suction on chest tube duration, incidence of persistent air leak, hospital stay, and hospitalization cost. Multivariable model with interaction terms was constructed to identify impact of covariables on effect of suction. Results The two cohorts matched well on baseline characteristics (nonsuction: 173; suction: 96). Compared with nonsuction group, suction group showed longer median chest tube duration (3 vs. 2 days, p = 0.003), higher incidences of persistent air leak (9.4% vs. 1.2%, p = 0.003), persistent drainage (16.8% vs. 5.8%, p = 0.007), and reduced drainage volume within first 3 postoperative days (386.90 vs. 504.78 ml, p = 0.011). Resection extent was identified to mediate the relationship between suction and chest tube drainage. Conclusions These findings discouraged adding external suction to water-seal drainage after UniVATS regarding longer chest tube duration and more persistent air leak. Patients undergoing lobectomy would benefit more from water-seal drainage without external suction compared with those doing sublobectomy.

oncology
Tubeless video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery in mediastinal tumor resection

Weixue Cui,Danxia Huang,Hengrui Liang,Guilin Peng,Mengyang Liu,Run Li,Xin Xu,Jianxing He

DOI: https://doi.org/10.21037/gs-20-682

Abstract:Background: It has been reported that tubeless video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (tubeless-VATS) is feasible and safe for thoracic diseases. Herein, we compared the early outcomes of mediastinal lesion resection between the tubeless and traditional VATS. Methods: Clinical data of all patients who underwent thoracoscopic mediastinal tumor resection were retrospectively collected. The study involved two groups: tubeless and traditional VATS group. Propensity score matching (PSM) was applied to eliminate the population bias. Intraoperative and postoperative variables were compared among matched cohorts. Results: In total, 43 patients in the tubeless group and 231 patients in the traditional VATS group were included. After 1:1 PSM, baseline characteristics were comparable. Anesthesia time (177.63 vs. 202.53 min; P=0.004) was shorter in tubeless group, while operation time (90.95 vs. 101.47 min; P=0.109) was similar. Overall, the total postoperative morbidity rate was similar in the two groups (15% vs. 12.5%; P=0.556). Specially, 4/43 patients in tubeless VATS group need to be re-put chest tubes postoperatively. A significant lower similar level of visual analogue scale score was observed in tubeless VATS group (1.73±0.48 vs. 3.41±0.87, P<0.001) in postoperative day 1. Meanwhile, the number of patients using postoperative opioid analgesia was also lower in tubeless VATS group (22.88% vs. 48.38%, P=0.016). Furthermore, hospital duration after surgery (2.58 vs. 5.47 days; P=0.002) was shorter in tubeless group. Conclusions: Compared with traditional VATS, tubeless VATS for mediastinal tumor may shorten the anesthesia time, decrease postoperative pain and fasten postoperative recovery in carefully selected patients.
Cancer and inflammatory bowel disease in the elderly.

S. Taleban,Emad Elquza,C. Gower‐Rousseau,L. Peyrin-Biroulet

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dld.2016.05.006

IF: 5.165

2016-10-01

Digestive and Liver Disease

Abstract:
Short-term analysis of uniport video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery via the subxiphoid approach without chest tube drainage for anterior mediastinal tumors: a comparative retrospective study

Min Cao,Qing Wang,Hang Yin,Yujie Fu,Xiaojing Zhao

DOI: https://doi.org/10.21037/atm-21-5790

IF: 3.616

2021-11-01

Annals of Translational Medicine

Abstract:BACKGROUND: Uniport video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) via the subxiphoid approach has emerged as a safe and effective treatment for anterior mediastinal tumors. However, there is limited evidence of the necessity of chest tubes and the comparative efficacy with other approaches.METHODS: A total of 141 patients with anterior mediastinal tumors receiving VATS were enrolled in this retrospective study. The patients were divided into the lateral approach (LA) group, the uniport subxiphoid approach (USA) group, and the three-port subxiphoid approach (TSA) group. Short-term analysis including operation time, chest tube rates, drainage duration, visual analogue scale (VAS) score, and hospital stay were compared. Postoperative CT scans were analyzed to evaluate the amount of pleural effusion.RESULTS: There was no significant difference in demographic and baseline characteristics among the three groups (all P>0.05). The operation time, blood loss, and hospital stay of the subxiphoid approach group were significantly lower than the LA group (P<0.001). The postoperative CT scans demonstrated that the USA group had a similar amount of pleural effusion as the other groups (P=0.1605). The postoperative VAS score of the USA group was significantly lower than the other groups (P<0.001). There was no significant difference in complications, in-hospital death, and conversion to thoracotomy among the three groups (all P>0.05).CONCLUSIONS: VATS via the subxiphoid approach is less invasive, equally safe, and same effective for anterior mediastinal tumors than the LA. The chest tube could be omitted for the USA.

oncology,medicine, research & experimental
Are the Efficacy and Safety of Chest Tubes in Uniportal Video-Assisted Thoracic Surgery Related to the Level of Intercostal Space Insertion or to the Drain Type? A Prospective Multicenter Study

Dania Nachira,Pietro Bertoglio,Mahmoud Ismail,Antonio Giulio Napolitano,Giuseppe Calabrese,Khrystyna Kuzmych,Maria Teresa Congedo,Carolina Sassorossi,Elisa Meacci,Leonardo Petracca Ciavarella,Marco Chiappetta,Filippo Lococo,Piergiorgio Solli,Stefano Margaritora

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm13020430

IF: 3.9

2024-01-13

Journal of Clinical Medicine

Abstract:Objectives: The aim of this study is to evaluate if the efficacy and safety of chest tube placement are influenced by the level of intercostal space insertion (uniportal VATS vs. biportal VATS) or by the type of drain employed (standard vs. smart coaxial drain). Methods: Data on patients who underwent either uniportal or biportal VATS upper lobectomies with lymphadenectomy were prospectively collected in three European centers. The uniportal VATS group with a 28 Fr standard chest tube (U-VATS standard) was compared with the uniportal VATS group with a 28 Fr smart drain (U-VATS smart), and U-VATS smart was also compared with biportal VATS with a 28 Fr smart drain inserted in the VIII intercostal space (Bi-VATS smart). Results: When comparing the U-VATS standard group with the U-VATS smart, a higher fluid output was recorded in the U-VATS smart (p: 0.004) in the III post-operative day (p.o.) and overall (p: 0.027), with a lower 90-day re-admission in the U-VATS smart (p: 0.04). The Bi-VATS smart group compared to U-VATS smart showed a higher fluid output in the I p.o. (p < 0.001), with no difference in total fluid amount or hospitalization. The Bi-VATS smart recorded a lower incidence (p < 0.001) of residual pleural space or effusion (p: 0.004) at chest X-rays prior to drain removal but a higher level of pain and chronic intercostal neuralgia (p: 0.03). Conclusions: Chest tube insertion through the same incision space in uniportal VATS seems to be safe and effective. Smart drains can improve the fluid output in uniportal VATS, as if the drainage were inserted in a lower space (i.e., biportal VATS), but with less discomfort.

medicine, general & internal
Comparison of the Results of Two Chest Tube Managements During an Enhanced Recovery Program after Video‐assisted Thoracoscopic Lobectomy: A Randomized Trial

Zihan Cui,Yuejuan Zhang,Chun Xu,Cheng Ding,Jun Chen,Chang Li,Jun Zhao

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1759-7714.13183

IF: 3.223

2019-01-01

Thoracic Cancer

Abstract:Background This study compared the results of the application of two different chest tube management systems; a drainage ball with low negative pressure and the more commonly used chest tube with water‐sealed bottle, after video‐assisted thoracoscopic (VATS) lobectomy. Methods A total of 60 patients undergoing lobectomy were enrolled into this prospective open label randomized clinical trial and equally divided into two groups. The data collected in the trial included age, gender, forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1), blood loss, operation time, drainage volume, drainage time, length of stay, postoperative pain score according to the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) within 24 hours after surgery and chest tube removal. This study was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT03598296). Results The characteristics of the patients were similar in both groups. Group ball patients had a lower pain score (after operation: 3.47 ± 1.80 vs. 6.20 ± 1.56, P < 0.001; after removal of chest tube: 1.47 ± 1.28 vs. 3.00 ± 1.29, P < 0.001); less analgesic used (2.83 ± 2.09 times vs. 5.00 ± 3.24 times, P = 0.003); less drainage time (upper tube: 3.89 ± 1.63 days vs. 5.10 ± 2.02 days, P = 0.048; lower tube: upper lobe 4.84 ± 1.61 days vs. 5.90 ± 1.52 days, P = 0.041; lower lobe: 3.82 ± 1.08 days vs. 5.70 ± 2.63 days, P = 0.042) and shorter length of stay (5.40 ± 1.65 days vs. 6.37 ± 1.99 days, P = 0.045). All other related parameters were similar in both groups. Conclusions For patients undergoing lobectomy, using a drainage ball with negative pressure could reduce hospitalization days and postoperative pain compared with the more commonly used chest tube with water‐sealed bottle when a strict postoperative curative procedure was performed.
A Comparative Study of Uniportal Video-Assisted Thoracic Surgery Technique versus Traditional Two-Port Video-Assisted Thoracic Surgery Technique for Treatment of Spontaneous Pneumothorax

Lu-ming JIN,Yu-qing HUANG,Ying-tai CHEN,Jian CUI,Jun LIU

DOI: https://doi.org/10.11675/j.issn.0253-4304.2014.06.10

2014-01-01

Abstract:Objective To discuss the feasibility of uniportal video-assisted thoracic surgery ( VATS) technique applied to pulmonary bullae resection for the treatment of spontaneous pneumothorax .Methods Three hundred and twenty-seven cases undergoing video-assisted pulmonary bullae resction and pleurodesis were divided into uniportal VATS technique group ( n=194) and traditional two-port VATS technique group ( n=133) .The clinical data including the operation time , postoperative thoracic cavity drainage volume , postoperative leakage time , postoperative extubation time,postoperative recurrence rate and perioperative staple-using number were compared between two groups .Results There were no significant differences in operation time ,bleeding ,postoperative recurrence ,postoperative hospital stay and perioperative staple-using number between two groups (P>0.05).The postoperative pain and wound numbness in the uniportal VATS technique group improved significantly compared with two -port VATS technique group ( P <0.05 ) . Conclusion The uniportal VATS technique has similar effect with two-port VATS technique on spontaneous pneumothorax patients undergoing pulmonary bullae resction ,but the patients using the uniportal technique have less pains and wound numbness after operation .
Perioperative outcomes of bi-pigtail catheter drainage strategy versus conventional chest tube after uniportal video-assisted thoracic lung surgery

Liwei Song,Xingshi Chen,Li Zhu,Gang Qian,Yanhui Xu,Zuodong Song,Jiantao Li,Tianxiang Chen,Jia Huang,Qingquan Luo,Xinghua Cheng,Yunhai Yang

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/ejcts/ezad411

2023-12-01

Abstract:Objectives: Chest tube (CT) drainage is a main cause of postoperative pain in lung surgery. Here, we introduced a novel drainage strategy with bi-pigtail catheters (PCs) and conducted a randomized controlled trial to compare with conventional CT drainage after uniportal video-assisted thoracic surgery lung surgery. Methods: A single-centre, prospective, open-labelled, randomized controlled trial (ChiCTR2000035337) was conducted with a preplanned sample size of 396. The primary outcome was the numerical pain rating scale (NPRS) on the first postoperative day. Secondary outcomes included other indicators of postoperative pain, drainage volume, duration of drainage, postoperative hospital stay, incidence of postoperative complications, CT reinsertion and medical costs. Results: A total number of 396 patients were randomized between August 2020 and January 2021, 387 of whom were included in the final analysis. The baseline and clinical characteristics of the patients were well balanced between 2 groups. The NPRS on the first postoperative day was significantly lower in the PC group than in the CT group (2.40 ± 1.27 vs 3.02 ± 1.39, p < 0.001), as well as the second/third-day NPRS, the incidence of sudden severe pain (9/192, 4.7% vs 34/195, 17.4%, P < 0.001) and pain requiring intervention (19/192, 9.9% vs 46/195, 23.6%, P < 0.001). In addition, the medical cost in the PC group was lower (US$7809 ± 1646 vs US$8205 ± 1815, P = 0.025). Univariable and multivariable analyses revealed that the drainage strategy was the only factor influencing the incidence of pain requiring intervention. Conclusions: The drainage strategy with bi-PCs in patients undergoing uniportal video-assisted thoracic surgery lung surgery alleviates postoperative pain with adequate safety and efficacy.
Safety and perioperative outcomes of uniportal versus multiportal video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery

Mohamed Alanwar,Mamdouh Elsharawy,Alaa Brik,Islam Ahmady,Dina Said Shemais

DOI: https://doi.org/10.4103/jmas.jmas_84_23

2024-07-01

Journal of Minimal Access Surgery

Abstract:Abstract Introduction: Uniportal video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (U-VATS) has recently become an alternative approach for many minimally invasive thoracic procedures, but although its surgical effectiveness has been proven, still its feasibility and safety are debated and unclear. the objective of this study was to compare the safety and perioperative outcomes of U-VATS versus multiportal VATS (M-VATS). Patients and Methods: This was a comparative follow-up randomised controlled clinical trial, carried out on 36 randomly selected eligible patients, and fulfilling the inclusion and exclusion criteria for VATS, they were assigned randomly into two groups: Study Group I including 18 patients undergoing U-VATS with conventional treatment using standard chest tube drainage and Control Group II including 18 patients undergoing M-VATS) with the same conventional treatment using standard chest tube drainage and served as a comparable control group. Results: Patients in the U-VATS Group 1 had faster operation time, and with reduced blood loss, pleural drainage and post-operative hospitalisation, they also experienced lower average post-operative pain score on comparison with those in M-VATS Group II ( P < 0.001), respectively. For either group, there were no hospital deaths or infections. There was no noticeable difference between the two groups in terms of the number of resected lymph nodes or the rates of intraoperative or post-operative complications ( P > 0.05). Conclusion: U-VATS is feasible and safe in eligible selected patients with favourable short-term perioperative outcomes (operative time, duration of pleural drainage, post-operative pain, early ambulation, duration of hospital stay as well as the risk of perioperative complications), and it can be considered the preferred approach in minimally invasive thoracic procedures that open up for the possibility of fast-track thoracic surgeries.

surgery
Clinical Analysis of Single Utility Port Video-Assisted Thoracic Surgery in Surgical Treatment of Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

WANG Xin,WANG Lei,WANG Hua-yong,ZHANG Hao

2013-01-01

Abstract:Objective To explore the feasibility and clinical application value of single utility port video-assisted thoracic surgery(VATS) pulmonary lobectomy and systematic mediastinal lymphadenectomy in surgical treatment of non-small cell lung cancer(NSCLC). Methods We reviewed the clinical data of 42patients with NSCLC received single utility port VATS pulmonary lobectomy and systematic mediastinal lymphadenectomy from March 2011 to March 2013. The utility port for observation was about 1.5 cm long and located at the 7th and 8th rib in the middle axillary line. The port for operation was about 4.0-5.0 cm long and located at the 3rd and 4th rib in the outer edge of pectoralis major. Results All of the 42 patients were successfully subjected to single utility port VATS pulmonary lobectomy and systematic mediastinal lymphadenectomy, none of them needed converse to transit-assisted incision or thoracotomy. Operative duration was 90-200 min; intraoperrative blood loss was 50-400 ml;lymph node dissection number was 9-16. After the surgery, the patients received chest drainage for 5-8 days. They were discharged from hospital in 6-10 days after the surgery without severe complications. Conclusions Based on the conventional three utility ports VATS, the single utility port VATS pulmonary lobectomy and systematic mediastinal lymphadenectomy caused less injury in surgical treatment of non-small cell lung cancer(NSCLC). It has certain clinical advantages and was a minimally invasive surgical treatment for selected patients with NSCLC.
Safety of one 8.5-Fr pigtail catheter for postoperative continuous open gravity drainage after uniportal video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery pneumonectomy

Xiang-Long Kong,Yue- Zhang,Yu- Jia,Bo-Xiong Ni,Mingyu- Wang,Xiang-Yuan Jin,Hai Xu and Shi-Dong Xu

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13019-024-02894-6

2024-07-19

Journal of Cardiothoracic Surgery

Abstract:Uniportal video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery pneumonectomy (U-VATS-P) is feasible and safe from a perioperative standpoint. How to choose the proper chest tube and drainage method is important in enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocols. In this study, we aimed to assess the safety of one 8.5-Fr (1Fr = 0.333 mm) pigtail catheter for postoperative continuous open gravity drainage after U-VATS-P.

surgery,cardiac & cardiovascular systems
Tubeless video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) under non-intubated, intravenous anesthesia with spontaneous ventilation and no placement of chest tube postoperatively

Fei Cui,Jun Liu,Shuben Li,Weiqiang Yin,Xu Xin,Wenlong Shao,Jianxing He

DOI: https://doi.org/10.21037/jtd.2016.08.02

Abstract:Background: To assess the feasibility and safety of tubeless video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) under non-intubated, intravenous anesthesia with spontaneous ventilation and no placement of a chest tube postoperatively compared with VATS under intubated anesthesia with single-lung mechanical ventilation. Methods: A total of 91 patients undergoing tubeless VATS (60 sympathectomies, 22 bullae resections, and 9 mediastinal tumor resections) between December 2012 and December 2015 were included. Additionally, 82 patients were treated by VATS by the same team while under intubated general anesthesia (52 sympathectomies, 19 bullae resections, and 11 mediastinal tumor resections). Comprehensive early outcome data, including intraoperative and postoperative variables, were compared between the subgroups. Results: In total, 89 patients in the tubeless group underwent an effective operation and exhibited good postoperative recovery, while 2 (one sympathectomy and one bullae resection) had their operation aborted for some reason. The tubeless group showed advantages in the postoperative fasting time, the mean duration of the postoperative hospital stay, and postoperative pain scores, while no significant difference was found in intraoperative blood loss, the operation time or postoperative complications between the tubeless group and the intubated group. Furthermore, 83% (49/59) of sympathectomies, 81% (17/21) of bullae resections, and 56% (5/9) of mediastinal tumor resections were achieved via day surgery. Conclusions: In this study, our experience has shown that tubeless VATS is a safe and feasible surgery with certain advantages in selected patients with thoracic disease and that we can achieve day surgery in these cases.
A novel drainage strategy using chest tube plus pleural catheter in uniportal upper lobectomy: A randomized controlled trial

Fu Yang,Xing Wang,Honglei Xu,Beatrice Aramini,Yuming Zhu,Gening Jiang,Jiang Fan

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1759-7714.14759

IF: 3.223

2022-12-24

Thoracic Cancer

Abstract:The new strategy with one chest tube plus pleural catheter is noninferior to double‐chest‐tube drainage after upper pulmonary lobectomy of uniportal VATS, offers superior pain control, and is recommended. Background In this study we explored whether one pleural catheter plus single chest tube drainage could achieve a noninferior drainage effect when compared with the traditional two chest tubes in uniportal video‐assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) for an upper pulmonary lobectomy. Methods Patients that underwent an upper pulmonary lobectomy from January to November 2020 were enrolled in this single‐center, randomized, open‐label, noninferiority trial. Prior to closure, patients were randomized to an intervention group who received an improved drainage strategy involving one pleural catheter with one chest tube (24 Fr), while traditional double chest tube drainage was applied for the control group. Results A total of 390 patients entered the study, although 190 were excluded for changing nonuniportal surgical approaches or opting for nonlobectomy resections. Finally, 200 patients were randomized (100 in the intervention group and 100 in the control group). The baseline demographic and clinical characteristics were comparable between the groups. The incidence of pneumothorax in the intervention and control groups was similar on postoperative Day 1 (noninferiority, 10% vs. 13%, p = 0.658). In addition, there were no significant differences in secondary outcomes such as incidence of pneumothorax by Day 30, postoperative chest tube/pleural catheter removal time, amount of drainage on Day 1, total amount of drainage after operation, or postoperative hospitalization. A significantly lower pain score was observed in the intervention group (3.33 ± 0.68 vs. 3.68 ± 0.94, p = 0.003). Conclusions The new strategy is noninferior to double chest tube drainage after an upper pulmonary lobectomy offers superior pain control, and is recommended for an upper lobectomy by uniportal VATS.

oncology,respiratory system
Clinical Evaluation of Univent tube in Airway Management during Video-Assisted Thoracoscopic Surgery

Li Shuiqing,Wang Jun,Han Wenyong

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1009-6604.2008.02.008

2008-01-01

Abstract:Objective To evaluate the value of Univent tube in the airway management during one-lung ventilation. Methods A total of 40 patients with pneumothorax undergoing video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) were randomly divided into Univent (U) and double-lumen tube (Robertshaw) (D) groups (20 in each). In U group, intubation was performed under the guidance of a fibreoptic bronchoscope; while in D group, the position of the tube was confirmed using fibreoptic bronchoscopy after intubation. The time of intubation, number of secondary dislodgements, quality of lung deflation, peak airway pressure during one-lung ventilation, and blood artery gas analysis data in the two groups were recorded 30 minutes after one-lung ventilation. Results The intubation time in U group was significantly longer than that in D group [(6.18±1.26) min vs (3.26±0.82) min, t=8.654, P=0.000]. The number of secondary dislodgements was 7 in U group, and 5 in D group(U=187.500, P=0.663). No significant difference was detected in the quality of lung deflation between the two groups, (U group: 15 excellent, 3 fair, and 2 poor; D group: 17 excellent, 2 fair, and 1 poor;U=179.500, P=0.583). The peak airway pressure during one-lung ventilation in U group was significantly lower than that in D group [(15.3±3.5) cm H2O vs (21.4±6.6) cm H2O, t=-3.649, P=0.001]; and the oxygen pressure in group U was significantly higher than that in group D [(303.8±65.7) mm Hg vs (258.4±72.9) mm Hg, t=2.066, P=0.046]. No significant difference was found in carbon dioxide pressure and oxygen saturation between the two groups. Conclusion During VATS, univent tube showed the same effectiveness and safety as DLT for one-lung ventilation.

[A case for diagnosis: erosive pustular dermatosis of the scalp].

Suction Versus Non-Suction Drainage Strategy after Uniportal Thoracoscopic Lung Surgery: a Prospective Cohort Study

Is tubeless uniportal video-assisted thoracic surgery for pulmonary wedge resection a safe procedure?

Pharyngeal dysfunction after treatment for pharyngeal cancer with surgery and radiotherapy

Tubeless single-port thoracoscopic sublobar resection: indication and safety

A Novel Tubeless Urinary Catheter Protocol Enhanced Recovery after Minimally Invasive Lung Surgery

A Novel Drainage Strategy Using Chest Tube Plus Pleural Catheter in Uniportal Upper Lobectomy: A Randomized Study

Suction Versus Nonsuction Drainage After Uniportal Video-Assisted Thoracoscopic Surgery: A Propensity Score-Matched Study

Tubeless video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery in mediastinal tumor resection

Cancer and inflammatory bowel disease in the elderly.

Short-term analysis of uniport video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery via the subxiphoid approach without chest tube drainage for anterior mediastinal tumors: a comparative retrospective study

Are the Efficacy and Safety of Chest Tubes in Uniportal Video-Assisted Thoracic Surgery Related to the Level of Intercostal Space Insertion or to the Drain Type? A Prospective Multicenter Study

Comparison of the Results of Two Chest Tube Managements During an Enhanced Recovery Program after Video‐assisted Thoracoscopic Lobectomy: A Randomized Trial

A Comparative Study of Uniportal Video-Assisted Thoracic Surgery Technique versus Traditional Two-Port Video-Assisted Thoracic Surgery Technique for Treatment of Spontaneous Pneumothorax

Perioperative outcomes of bi-pigtail catheter drainage strategy versus conventional chest tube after uniportal video-assisted thoracic lung surgery

Safety and perioperative outcomes of uniportal versus multiportal video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery

Clinical Analysis of Single Utility Port Video-Assisted Thoracic Surgery in Surgical Treatment of Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

Safety of one 8.5-Fr pigtail catheter for postoperative continuous open gravity drainage after uniportal video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery pneumonectomy

Tubeless video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) under non-intubated, intravenous anesthesia with spontaneous ventilation and no placement of chest tube postoperatively

A novel drainage strategy using chest tube plus pleural catheter in uniportal upper lobectomy: A randomized controlled trial

Clinical Evaluation of Univent tube in Airway Management during Video-Assisted Thoracoscopic Surgery