Abstract:We study the competition and strategy selections between a class of generalized zero-determinant (ZD) strategies and the classic strategies of always cooperate (AllC), always defect (AllD), tit-for-tat (TFT), and win-stay-lose-shift (WSLS) strategies in an iterated prisoner’s dilemma comprehensively. Using the generalized ZD strategy, a player could get a payoff that is χ (χ>1) times that of his opponent’s, when the payoff is measured with respect to a referencing baseline parameterized by 0≤σ≤1. Varying σ gives ZD strategies of tunable generosity from the extortionate-like ZD strategy for σ≪1 to the compliance-like strategy at σ≈1. Expected payoffs when ZD strategy competes with each one of the classic strategies are presented. Strategy evolution based on adopting the strategy of a better performing neighbor is studied in a well-mixed population of finite size and a population on a square lattice. Depending on the parameters, extortion-like strategies may not be evolutionarily stable despite a positive surplus over cooperative strategies, while extortion-like strategies may dominate or coexist with other strategies that tend to defect despite a negative surplus. The dependence of the equilibrium fraction of ZD strategy players on the model parameters in a well-mixed population can be understood analytically by comparing the average payoffs to the competing strategies. On a square lattice, the success of the ZD strategy can be qualitatively understood by focusing on the relative alignments of the finite number of payoff values that the two competing strategies could attain when the spatial structure is imposed. ZD strategies with properly chosen generosity could be more successful in evolutionary competing systems.

Evolutionary performance of zero-determinant strategies in multiplayer games

Evolutionary Performance of Zero-Determinant Strategies in Multiplayer Games.

Evolutionary dynamics of zero-determinant strategies in repeated multiplayer games

Evolutionary Behavior of Generalized Zero-Determinant Strategies in Iterated Prisoner'S Dilemma

From extortion to generosity, the evolution of zero-determinant strategies in the prisoner's dilemma

Cooperation and control in multiplayer social dilemmas

Evolution of extortion in iterated prisoner’s dilemma games

Zero-determinant alliances in multiplayer social dilemmas

The intricate geometry of zero-determinant strategies underlying evolutionary adaptation from extortion to generosity

The Evolution of Cooperation in Spatial Multigame with Voluntary Participation

The Evolution of Extortion in Iterated Prisoner's Dilemma Games

Adaptive dynamics of extortion and compliance

Evolutionary instability of Zero Determinant strategies demonstrates that winning isn't everything

Zero-determinant strategies in iterated multi-strategy games

Different Perceptions of Social Dilemmas: Evolutionary Multigames in Structured Populations

Zero-Determinant Strategies in the Iterated Public Goods Game

Evolutionary prisoner's dilemma games with optional participation

Networked Decision-Making Dynamics Based on Fair, Extortionate and Generous Strategies in Iterated Public Goods Games

Zero-determinant strategies in finitely repeated games