Abstract:Background: Occupational segregation by gender is one of the major problems faced by professional women in the labor market. Since the sixties, psychological explanations point out that gender stereotypes are responsible for this persistent inequality in the workforce. Nevertheless, most of research has overlooked that emotions are particularly important as the discrimination faced by professional women is better explained by the ambivalent feelings they provoke than by stereotyping. Aim: The aim of this research is to analyse from the Stereotype Content Model (SCM, Fiske et al., 2002) and the Behaviors from Intergroup Affect and Stereotypes (BIAS) Map (Cuddy et al., 2007) whether cognitive, affective and behavioral components of prejudice act jointly to explain gender segregation in the labor market. Method: 1098 Spanish workers (59% women) from different occupational sectors were requested to rate how professional men and women in high (leaders) and low status (secretaries) positions who work in male (high-tech company) and female-dominated (health company) occupations are perceived (stereotypes), as well as the affective responses and the behavioral tendencies that they arouse. Data analyses: Two analyses of variance (a) and two ANOVAs with repeated measures (b) were carried out to analyze the effect of occupational status (high vs. low), type of company (high-tech vs. health) and workers' sex (men vs. women) on: (a) the social structural variables (status and competition), (b) on the stereotyped dimensions (competence and warmth) and (c) on emotions (admiration, envy and contempt). Finally, mediational analyses were carried out to examine the link between stereotypes, emotions, and behavioral tendencies. Results: The most striking results show that (a) competition and status differentiate leaders and secretaries, (b) men leaders are rated as more competent and less warm than secretaries, whereas women leaders are viewed as more competent than women secretaries but with equivalent warmth, and (c) admiration and envy predict behavioral tendencies, but restricted to professional men regardless of organizational context. Conclusion: Results reveal that cognitive, affective and behavioral components of prejudice act jointly to explain discrimination against women in the workplace. Findings are discussed according to the SCM and the BIAS Map.

Tokenism in performance evaluation: The effects of work group representation on male-female and White-Black differences in performance ratings.

Token Achievement: An Examination of Proportional Representation and Performance Outcomes

A meta-analysis of gender stereotypes and bias in experimental simulations of employment decision making.

Inside the Black Box of Organizational Life: The Gendered Language of Performance Assessment

When Performance Trumps Gender Bias: Joint vs. Separate Evaluation

Double Jeopardy?: The Interaction of Gender and Race on Earnings in the United States

People perception and stereotype-based responding: task context matters

Betting on Diversity – Occupational Segregation and Gender Stereotypes

Gender and cultural bias in student evaluations: Why representation matters

Modeling gender differences in the job promotion process: Replication and extension of Martell et al. (1996).

Whose misbehavior is inexcusable—And which one? Job‐related discrimination against ethnic minority and majority women

Gender Differences in Recognition for Group Work

Perceived warmth and competence predict callback rates in meta-analyzed North American labor market experiments

Diverse Work Groups and Employee Performance

Tokenism in Chinese Work Organisations? Subordinate-supervisor Gender Combination and Worker's Organisational Commitment in China

How race influences perceptions of objectivity and hiring preferences

The Effects of Occupational Status and Sex-Typed Jobs on the Evaluation of Men and Women

The Multiple Dimensions of Gender Stereotypes: A Current Look at Men’s and Women’s Characterizations of Others and Themselves

Sex, age, and equity behavior.

Cobbler Stick With Your Reads: People's Perceptions of Gendered Robots Performing Gender Stereotypical Tasks

Gender Stereotype Susceptibility