Abstract:Limited by analytical techniques,previous researches try to understand the cooperation status of a specific research field by using simple bibliometric methods to calculate the amount of authors' articles and co-authored articles,coauthor rates,etc. However,these kinds of study can't provide in-depth information about cooperative relations within co-authorship networks and can't tell the position and role of a specific author within co-authorship networks of a certain research field. Social network analysis techniques make it possible to discover information in large cooperation networks. Although some scholars have applied social network analysis to examining co-authorship relationships,the number of existing study is still very limited. Social network analysis is an effective coauthorship analysis method. We try to use social network analysis to study co-authorship issues in the management discipline. This article will help better understand the development features of management discipline,cooperation state and some general characteristics of academic cooperation in the management field.This paper identified the research scope of journals based on a list of journals selected by UTD's researching project. The list contains 24 top journals in the field of management( or business) research. The initial sample used 14855 papers published by top 24journals between 2000 and 2011. The final sample are 1,907 papers published by 110 authors who had published more than 15 papers during the period of time.Firstly,a 110 * 110 co-authorship matrix was built. Secondly,a co-authorship network was visualized by importing the builtmatrix into Ucinet. Thirdly,the matrix was transformed into a 0-1 matrixin order to calculate the degree,freeman betweenness,and closeness for each node. Finally we tried to find whether there are some cooperative groups within the management discipline coauthorship network using K-core analysis.Our research results show that some authors,such as Eric T. Bradlow,and Steven M. Shuganowned have close relationships with other authors,and play central roles and core positions in the co-author network. The results demonstrate that there were fewer opportunities of having cooperation among authors when the co-author network is loosely organized. In addition,some author groups have close connections among group members when they are controlled by coercive force. Based on the K-core analysis,11 cooperative groups are found and the largest cooperative group is centered on topics,such as supply chain management,operations research,product management. The interdisciplinary study is primarily related to management science,operations management and marketing.

Making Sense of Organization Dynamics Using Text Analysis.

A model of dynamic interest management: interaction analysis in collaborative virtual environment.

How We Do Things With Words: Analyzing Text as Social and Cultural Data

Communication network dynamics in a large organizational hierarchy

Exploring Interdisciplinarity of Science Projects Based on the Text Mining

Content and Text Analysis Methods for Organizational Research

Organizational Sensemaking in ERP Implementation: the Influence of Sensemaking Structure.

Editorial introduction: The power of words and networks

Reconfiguring a hierarchical supply chain model under pandemic using text mining and social media analysis

Socially Connected Supply Chains

The Structure and Dynamics of Co-Citation Clusters: A Multiple-Perspective Co-Citation Analysis

Data-driven strategies in operation management: mining user-generated content in Twitter

Co-Authorship network Features in the Management Discipline

Power: Toward a Unifying Analytical Framework

Analysis of power dynamics in sustainable supply chain under non-linear demand setup

Big textual data research for operations management: topic modelling with grounded theory

A Literature Review of Organizational Discourse and Prospects

Decoding excellence: Mapping the demand for psychological traits of operations and supply chain professionals through text mining

A Structural Topic and Sentiment-Discourse Model for Text Analysis

Organization Mining Using Online Social Networks

Extensible Topic Modeling and Analysis Framework for Multisource Data*