Abstract:Purpose While the literature on multitier supply chain management traditionally assumes that first-tier suppliers belong to the visible proportion of the supply base, intermediaries might limit focal firms' visible horizon already at this stage. High power asymmetries promoting centrality and complexity in the supply network are seen as a particular root cause that limits the impact of governance mechanisms for sustainability. To map the space for governance mechanisms in a network-sensitive context more comprehensively, the study analyzes supply network characteristics from a power perspective. Design/methodology/approach This research is conceptual. To better understand power imbalances and mutual dependencies from network centrality and complexity, network configurations were constructed drawing on resource dependence theory. These configurations allow deducing the impact of (non-)mediated governance mechanisms for a sustainable development in the supply network. An agenda to stimulate future empirical and model-based research is accordingly presented. Findings The research shows that those networks with densely interconnected first-tier suppliers promote network centrality and complexity, leading to an inverted U-shape relationship between the focal firm's exertion of coercive power and the sustainability performance in the supply network. The findings allow a more comprehensive theoretical grounding for mapping governance approaches in a network-sensitive context and provide insights on how to avoid negative effects from power asymmetries. Practical implications The findings suggest the need for accompanying, indirect governance mechanisms already at the stage of first-tier suppliers based on non-mediated forms of power, such as referent power, also promoting disintermediation. Purchasing companies may also consider using digital platform technologies that foster disintermediation, such as blockchain technology. Originality/value By studying intermediaries from a power and network perspective, the conceptualization adds to the discussion on governance in multitier sustainable supply chain networks in various industries. Furthermore, it contributes to the increasing efforts of middle-range theorizing in logistics and supply chain management. The results partially challenge previous assumptions on the moderating role of specific network characteristics.

Analysis of power dynamics in sustainable supply chain under non-linear demand setup

Designing supply contracts for the sustainable supply chain using game theory

Game theoretical analysis in two-echelon sustainable supply chains to manage and coordinate strategic decisions

Analysis of green supply chains under fairness concern and differential power structure

An integrated approach to evaluating sustainability in supply chains using evolutionary game theory

Multidirectional analysis for sustainable development: An examination of sustainable policies, corporate social responsibility, and organizational performance

Willingness-to-cede behaviour in sustainable supply chain coordination

A Supply Chain Coordination Optimization Model with Revenue Sharing and Carbon Awareness

Supply chain analysis under green sensitive consumer demand and cost sharing contract

A dynamic game on Green Supply Chain Management

A sustainable game strategic supply chain model with multi-factor dependent demand and mark-up under revenue sharing contract

A dynamic Stackelberg game for green supply chain management

The Impact of Social Preferences on Supply Chain Performance: An Application of the Game Theory Model

Supply Chain Models with Mutual Commitments and Implications for Social Responsibility

Theorizing the impact of network characteristics on multitier sustainable supply chain governance: a power perspective

Low carbon joint strategy and coordination for a dyadic supply chain with Nash bargaining fairness

Pricing and greening strategies in a dual-channel supply chain with cost and profit sharing contracts

Green Supply Chain Game: Decision-Making and Coordination Mechanism Design

Supply chain dynamics and optimization

Joint Green Marketing Decision-Making of Green Supply Chain Considering Power Structure and Corporate Social Responsibility

Differential game analysis of carbon emissions reduction and promotion in a sustainable supply chain considering social preferences