Abstract:Explaining the predictions of AI models is paramount in safety-critical applications, such as in legal or medical domains. One form of explanation for a prediction is an extractive rationale, i.e., a subset of features of an instance that lead the model to give its prediction on that instance. For example, the subphrase “he stole the mobile phone” can be an extractive rationale for the prediction of “Theft”. Previous works on generating extractive rationales usually employ a two-phase model: a selector that selects the most important features (i.e., the rationale) followed by a predictor that makes the prediction based exclusively on the selected features. One disadvantage of these works is that the main signal for learning to select features comes from the comparison of the answers given by the predictor to the ground-truth answers. In this work, we propose to squeeze more information from the predictor via an information calibration method. More precisely, we train two models jointly: one is a typical neural model that solves the task at hand in an accurate but black-box manner, and the other is a selector-predictor model that additionally produces a rationale for its prediction. The first model is used as a guide for the second model. We use an adversarial technique to calibrate the information extracted by the two models such that the difference between them is an indicator of the missed or over-selected features. In addition, for natural language tasks, we propose a language-model-based regularizer to encourage the extraction of fluent rationales. Experimental results on a sentiment analysis task, a hate speech recognition task, as well as on three tasks from the legal domain show the effectiveness of our approach to rationale extraction.

Interpretable Rationale Augmented Charge Prediction System.

Interpretable Charge Prediction for Criminal Cases with Dynamic Rationale Attention

Interpretable Charge Prediction for Legal Cases Based on Interdependent Legal Information

Interpretable Charge Predictions for Criminal Cases: Learning to Generate Court Views from Fact Descriptions

Interpretable Neural Predictions with Differentiable Binary Variables

Learning to Predict Charges for Criminal Cases with Legal Basis

A hybrid neural network model for predicting charges by incorporating legal knowledge

What Makes a Charge? Identifying Charge-Discriminative Facts with Legal Elements.

Creating Auxiliary Representations from Charge Definitions for Criminal Charge Prediction

Legal Charge Prediction Via Bilinear Attention Network

Rationale-Augmented Convolutional Neural Networks for Text Classification

Rationalizing Predictions by Adversarial Information Calibration

BLHNN: A Novel Charge Prediction Model Based on Bi-Attention LSTM-CNN Hybrid Neural Network

Charge Prediction with Legal Attention

Few-Shot Charge Prediction with Discriminative Legal Attributes.

Unsupervised Selective Rationalization with Noise Injection

Beyond Accuracy: Ensuring Correct Predictions With Correct Rationales

You Can Do Better! if You Elaborate the Reason when Making Prediction.

DARE: Disentanglement-Augmented Rationale Extraction

Neural Reasoning Networks: Efficient Interpretable Neural Networks With Automatic Textual Explanations

An Augmented Interpretive Framework Based on Aspect Sentiment Words Aggregation