Novel computerized measure of apathy associates with care partner burden and instrumental activities of daily living in Parkinson's disease

Jennifer Liu,Lauren Massimo,Corey T. McMillan,Nabila Dahodwala
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.parkreldis.2023.105983
IF: 4.402
2024-01-06
Parkinsonism & Related Disorders
Abstract:Background Impairment in goal-directed behavior (GDB) contributes to apathy, a prevalent syndrome in Parkinson's disease (PD). The Philadelphia Apathy Computerized Task (PACT) is a performance-based measure of GDB that may be less confounded by reduced patient insight, cognitive impairment, and care partner burnout. Objective To examine how the PACT is related to patient function and care partner burden. Methods PD patients with normal cognition (n = 19) or mild cognitive impairment (n = 14) and their care partners were recruited. Participants completed the PACT, a computerized paradigm consisting of subtasks specific to each component of GDB: initiation, motivation, and planning. Care partners completed the Zarit Burden Interview (ZBI) and the Penn Parkinson's Daily Activities Questionnaire (PDAQ-15). The associations between mean latency on each PACT subtask and ZBI and PDAQ-15 scores, respectively, were tested using Spearman's rank correlation coefficients. Significant associations were further delineated using multivariate regression with the following covariates: age, years of education, MoCA score, daily levodopa equivalency dose, UPDRS Part III score, and GDS-15 score. Results Worse performance on the planning subtask of the PACT related to higher ZBI scores and lower PDAQ-15 scores when adjusting for covariates. Decreased initiation was associated with higher ZBI and decreased motivation with lower PDAQ-15. Conclusions Specific components of the PACT are related to patient and care partner outcomes in PD. The main advantage of this measure is to minimize the confounds of poor insight and care partner distress. We propose future research directions to refine the PACT for potential use in research and clinical practice.
clinical neurology
What problem does this paper attempt to address?