Abstract:Introduction Zygomatic implants (ZIs) have emerged as a promising option for rehabilitating completely edentulous patients with severe maxillary atrophy. These implants anchor into the zygomatic bone, bypassing the need for extensive grafting procedures. Success rates in dental and craniofacial implant surgeries can be influenced by several surgical factors, including suture techniques, flap design, and treatment planning. The research aimed to present the clinical outcomes and complications in individuals with severely resorbed maxillae who underwent prosthodontic rehabilitation using the Quad Zygoma Protocol (QZP) and the Anatomy-Guided Approach (AGA), focusing on long-term assessment. Material and methods Data for this retrospective study were extracted from the institution's patient database, involving a meticulous review of patient records. This comprehensive examination encompassed demographic data, preoperative assessments, details of surgical procedures, postoperative complications, and subsequent follow-up evaluations. Patients with severe maxillary bone deficiencies resulting in complete edentulism, due to inadequate bone quality and quantity in both anterior and posterior regions, were selected for inclusion. Exclusion criteria were applied to individuals with incomplete records or insufficient follow-up data, as well as those who underwent alternative treatment modalities or presented with comorbidities potentially impacting implant outcomes. The selected patients underwent treatment utilizing the QZP, with each participant subjected to a minimum three-year follow-up period. The implant survival rate, prosthetic success, complications, and Oral Health-Related Quality of Life using the OHIP-14 questionnaire were assessed. Results At the end of the follow-up period involving 12 patients (eight men, four women) with 43 ZIs - 37 from Neodent, four from Nobel Biocare, and two from Norris - with a mean duration of 4.3 years (range: 1.2-5.4), the overall success rate stood at 99.08%, with only 1 out of 42 implants failing. All patients received immediate loading with an acrylic prosthesis, proving effective in 98.2% of cases. The most common issues observed were localized soft tissue inflammation (35.7%) and sinus inflammation (12.5%), occurring after mean follow-up periods of 1.2 and 3.5 years, respectively. In 12 patients, the mean score of the OHIP-14 questionnaire was 1.6 ± 2.6, with a follow-up period of 5 ± 0.6 years. Conclusion The QZP has consistently demonstrated excellent long-term success in restoring severely reduced maxillary structures. An immediate loading approach could aid in stabilizing ZIs through cross-arch support.

Assessment of different treatment alternatives for patients with total maxillectomy

Clinical and Patient-Centered Outcomes Following Rehabilitation of Atrophic Edentulous Maxilla Using Six Implants Placed Simultaneously with Bilateral Maxillary Sinus Augmentation: A Retrospective Case Series.

Finite element analysis of three zygomatic implant techniques for the severely atrophic edentulous maxilla

Biomechanical Three-Dimensional Finite Element Analysis of Prostheses Retained With/without Zygoma Implants in Maxillectomy Patients.

Dental Versus Zygomatic Implants in the Treatment of Maxillectomy: A Finite Element Analysis

Long-term Survival and Complications of Quad Zygoma Protocol with Anatomy-Guided Approach in Severely Atrophic Maxilla: A Retrospective Follow-Up Analysis of Up to 17 Years

Evaluation of Surgical Outcomes of Zygomatic Implant-Supported Rehabilitation of Atrophic Maxillary Arches - A Prospective Study

Mechanical and modal analysis of different implant strategies for loss of three teeth with bone atrophy in the maxillary posterior region

[Biomechanical Evaluation of Zygomatic Implant in Unilateral Maxillary Defect Restoration].

Evaluation of the Long-Term Success and Patient-Related Outcomes of Zygomatic Implants in Atrophic Maxillary Ridges

BIOMECHANICAL ANALYSIS OF THE APPLICATION OF ZYGOMA IMPLANTS FOR PROSTHESIS IN UNILATERAL MAXILLARY DEFECT

Functional Design and Biomechanical Evaluation of the Maxillary Reconstruction with Zygoma Implant

[Zygomatic Implants Anchorage for the Rehabilitation of Maxillary Defects].

To Evaluate the Effect of Zygomatic Area As Bearing Seat and Zygomatic Osseointegrated Implant from Oral Cavity Ofmaxillary Obturator Prostheses by Mechanics

Biomechanical evaluation of zygomatic implant in bilateral maxillary defect restoration

Biomechanical comparison of different prosthetic materials and posterior implant angles in all-on-4 treatment concept by three-dimensional finite element analysis

A single-arm clinical trial investigating the feasibility of the zygomatic implant quad approach for Cawood and Howell Class 4 edentulous maxilla: An option for immediate loading

“Three-Dimensional Ring” of Zygomatic-Supported Prosthetics Rehabilitation in Bilateral Maxillary Defect

Maxillary rehabilitation after zygomatic implant sequelae using custom subperiosteal implants: A case study

Biomechanical finite element analysis of short-implant-supported, 3-unit, fixed CAD/CAM prostheses in the posterior mandible

Biomechanical Study of Zygomatic-Maxillary Buttress Restoration with Titanium Alloplastic Implant in Functional Maxillary Reconstruction