Quantitative Phase Imaging as Sensitive Screening Method for Nanoparticle-Induced Cytotoxicity Assessment

Anne Marzi,Kai Moritz Eder,Álvaro Barroso,Björn Kemper,Jürgen Schnekenburger
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/cells13080697
IF: 6
2024-04-19
Cells
Abstract:The assessment of nanoparticle cytotoxicity is challenging due to the lack of customized and standardized guidelines for nanoparticle testing. Nanoparticles, with their unique properties, can interfere with biochemical test methods, so multiple tests are required to fully assess their cellular effects. For a more reliable and comprehensive assessment, it is therefore imperative to include methods in nanoparticle testing routines that are not affected by particles and allow for the efficient integration of additional molecular techniques into the workflow. Digital holographic microscopy (DHM), an interferometric variant of quantitative phase imaging (QPI), has been demonstrated as a promising method for the label-free assessment of the cytotoxic potential of nanoparticles. Due to minimal interactions with the sample, DHM allows for further downstream analyses. In this study, we investigated the capabilities of DHM in a multimodal approach to assess cytotoxicity by directly comparing DHM-detected effects on the same cell population with two downstream biochemical assays. Therefore, the dry mass increase in RAW 264.7 macrophages and NIH-3T3 fibroblast populations measured by quantitative DHM phase contrast after incubation with poly(alkyl cyanoacrylate) nanoparticles for 24 h was compared to the cytotoxic control digitonin, and cell culture medium control. Viability was then determined using a metabolic activity assay (WST-8). Moreover, to determine cell death, supernatants were analyzed for the release of the enzyme lactate dehydrogenase (LDH assay). In a comparative analysis, in which the average half-maximal effective concentration (EC50) of the nanocarriers on the cells was determined, DHM was more sensitive to the effect of the nanoparticles on the used cell lines compared to the biochemical assays.
cell biology
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
The paper attempts to address the challenges posed by the lack of customized and standardized guidelines in the assessment of nanoparticle toxicity. Specifically, due to the unique properties of nanoparticles, they may interfere with traditional biochemical assays, necessitating multiple tests to comprehensively evaluate their cellular effects. To obtain more reliable and comprehensive assessment results, researchers urgently need to introduce methods that are not affected by nanoparticles and can efficiently integrate additional molecular techniques into the workflow. The paper uses Digital Holographic Microscopy (DHM)—an interferometric variant of Quantitative Phase Imaging (QPI)—as a label-free method to assess the cytotoxicity of nanoparticles. DHM interacts less with the sample, allowing for further downstream analysis. In the study, the authors evaluated the cytotoxicity of poly(alkyl cyanoacrylate) nanoparticles (PACA) in RAW 264.7 macrophages and NIH-3T3 fibroblasts by comparing the effectiveness of DHM with two downstream biochemical assays (WST-8 and Lactate Dehydrogenase (LDH) assays). The results showed that when comparing the half-maximal effective concentration (EC50) of different methods, DHM was more sensitive to the cytotoxicity of nanoparticles.