Abstract:<p>While it is universally recognised that environmental factors can cause phenotypic trait variation <i>via</i> phenotypic plasticity, the extent to which causal processes operate in the reverse direction has received less consideration. In fact individuals are often active agents in determining the environments, and hence the selective regimes, they experience. There are several important mechanisms by which this can occur, including habitat selection and niche construction, that are expected to result in phenotype–environment correlations (i.e. non-random assortment of phenotypes across heterogeneous environments). Here we highlight an additional mechanism – intraspecific competition for preferred environments – that may be widespread, and has implications for phenotypic evolution that are currently underappreciated. Under this mechanism, variation among individuals in traits determining their competitive ability leads to phenotype–environment correlation; more competitive phenotypes are able to acquire better patches. Based on a concise review of the empirical evidence we argue that competition-induced phenotype–environment correlations are likely to be common in natural populations before highlighting the major implications of this for studies of natural selection and microevolution. We focus particularly on two central issues. First, competition-induced phenotype–environment correlation leads to the expectation that positive feedback loops will amplify phenotypic and fitness variation among competing individuals. As a result of being able to acquire a better environment, winners gain more resources and even better phenotypes – at the expense of losers. The distinction between individual quality and environmental quality that is commonly made by researchers in evolutionary ecology thus becomes untenable. Second, if differences among individuals in competitive ability are underpinned by heritable traits, competition results in both genotype–environment correlations and an expectation of indirect genetic effects (IGEs) on resource-dependent life-history traits. Theory tells us that these IGEs will act as (partial) constraints, reducing the amount of genetic variance available to facilitate evolutionary adaptation. Failure to recognise this will lead to systematic overestimation of the adaptive potential of populations. To understand the importance of these issues for ecological and evolutionary processes in natural populations we therefore need to identify and quantify competition-induced phenotype–environment correlations in our study systems. We conclude that both fundamental and applied research will benefit from an improved understanding of when and how social competition causes non-random distribution of phenotypes, and genotypes, across heterogeneous environments.</p>

Experimental evidence that competition strength scales with ecological similarity: a case study using Anolis lizards

Phylogenetic distance and resource availability mediate direction and strength of plant interactions in a competition experiment

Character displacement in the midst of background evolution in island populations of Anolis lizards: A spatiotemporal perspective

Does intraspecific competition promote variation? A test via synthesis

Social competition as a driver of phenotype–environment correlations: implications for ecology and evolution

The Beddington–DeAngelis Competitive Response: Intra-Species Interference Enhances Coexistence in Species Competition

Models of experimental competitive intensities predict home and away differences in invasive impact and the effects of an endophytic mutualist

Competition and phylogeny determine community structure in Müllerian co-mimics

Robust coexistence in ecological competitive communities

Species identity cues in animal communication

Estimating Interaction Strengths with Correlations in Annual Relative Weight: Interspecific Competition and Predation in Fishes, Pueblo Reservoir, Colorado

The Evolution of Competitive Ability

Competitive asymmetries, birthing asynchrony and sibling rivalry in a social lizard

Competing females strategically combine signals and physical aggression differently from males in a polygynous tropical lizard

The effects of intransitive competition on coexistence

Competitive Intransitivity Promotes Species Coexistence

Diversity Increases Indirect Interactions, Attenuates the Intensity of Competition, and Promotes Coexistence

Predation and Competition Differentially Affect the Interactions and Trophic Niches of a Neotropical Amphibian Guild

Rapid life-history evolution reinforces competitive asymmetry between invasive and resident species

Diversity begets diversity in competition for space

Evolutionary relatedness does not predict competition and co-occurrence in natural or experimental communities of green algae