Abstract:In this paper, we interrogate whether data quality issues track demographic group membership (based on sex, race and age) and whether automated data cleaning — of the kind commonly used in production ML systems — impacts the fairness of predictions made by these systems. To the best of our knowledge, the impact of data cleaning on fairness in downstream tasks has not been investigated in the literature. We first analyse the tuples flagged by common error detection strategies in five research datasets. We find that, while specific data quality issues, such as higher rates of missing values, are associated with membership in historically disadvantaged groups, poor data quality does not generally track demographic group membership. As a follow-up, we conduct a large-scale empirical study on the impact of automated data cleaning on fairness, involving more than 26,000 model evaluations. We observe that, while automated data cleaning is unlikely to worsen accuracy, it is more likely to worsen fairness than to improve it, especially when the cleaning techniques are not carefully chosen. Furthermore, we find that the positive or negative impact of a particular cleaning technique often depends on the choice of fairness metric and group definition (single-attribute or intersectional). We make our code and experimental results publicly available. The analysis we conducted in this paper is difficult, primarily because it requires that we think holistically about disparities in data quality, disparities in the effectiveness of data cleaning methods, and impacts of such disparities on ML model performance for different demographic groups. Such holistic analysis can and should be supported by data engineering tools, and requires substantial data engineering research. Towards this goal, we discuss open research questions, envision the development of fairness-aware data cleaning methods, and their integration into complex pipelines for ML-based decision making.

Impacts of Dirty Data on Classification and Clustering Models: an Experimental Evaluation.

Impacts of Dirty Data: and Experimental Evaluation

Assessing Data Quality Within Available Context

CleanML: A Study for Evaluating the Impact of Data Cleaning on ML Classification Tasks

The Effects of Data Quality on Machine Learning Performance

From Data Quality to Model Quality: an Exploratory Study on Deep Learning

On How Data Are Partitioned in Model Development and Evaluation: Confronting the Elephant in the Room to Enhance Model Generalization.

On the Impact of Data Quality on Image Classification Fairness

Automated Data Cleaning Can Hurt Fairness in Machine Learning-based Decision Making

Class Noise Vs. Attribute Noise: A Quantitative Study

Data Quality Antipatterns for Software Analytics

Big Data Cleaning Model of Multi-Source Heterogeneous Power Grid Based On Machine Learning Classification Algorithm

Dirty Data Management In Cloud Database

Distance-based Data Cleaning: A Survey (Technical Report)

Overview and Importance of Data Quality for Machine Learning Tasks

Improving Data Quality through Deep Learning and Statistical Models

Detecting Quality Problems in Data Models by Clustering Heterogeneous Data Values

A Survey on Data Cleaning Methods for Improved Machine Learning Model Performance

Exploring Dataset-Scale Indicators of Data Quality

Data Quality Matters: A Case Study of Obsolete Comment Detection.

Concerned with Data Contamination? Assessing Countermeasures in Code Language Model