Abstract:In this paper, we interrogate whether data quality issues track demographic group membership (based on sex, race and age) and whether automated data cleaning — of the kind commonly used in production ML systems — impacts the fairness of predictions made by these systems. To the best of our knowledge, the impact of data cleaning on fairness in downstream tasks has not been investigated in the literature. We first analyse the tuples flagged by common error detection strategies in five research datasets. We find that, while specific data quality issues, such as higher rates of missing values, are associated with membership in historically disadvantaged groups, poor data quality does not generally track demographic group membership. As a follow-up, we conduct a large-scale empirical study on the impact of automated data cleaning on fairness, involving more than 26,000 model evaluations. We observe that, while automated data cleaning is unlikely to worsen accuracy, it is more likely to worsen fairness than to improve it, especially when the cleaning techniques are not carefully chosen. Furthermore, we find that the positive or negative impact of a particular cleaning technique often depends on the choice of fairness metric and group definition (single-attribute or intersectional). We make our code and experimental results publicly available. The analysis we conducted in this paper is difficult, primarily because it requires that we think holistically about disparities in data quality, disparities in the effectiveness of data cleaning methods, and impacts of such disparities on ML model performance for different demographic groups. Such holistic analysis can and should be supported by data engineering tools, and requires substantial data engineering research. Towards this goal, we discuss open research questions, envision the development of fairness-aware data cleaning methods, and their integration into complex pipelines for ML-based decision making.

On the Impact of Data Quality on Image Classification Fairness

Fairness Testing of Deep Image Classification with Adequacy Metrics

Class Noise Vs. Attribute Noise: A Quantitative Study

Data quality dimensions for fair AI

Classes Are Not Equal: An Empirical Study on Image Recognition Fairness

The Effects of Data Quality on Machine Learning Performance

When Fair Classification Meets Noisy Protected Attributes

On Comparing Fair Classifiers under Data Bias

A Large-Scale Empirical Study on Improving the Fairness of Image Classification Models

Impacts of Dirty Data on Classification and Clustering Models: an Experimental Evaluation.

Automated Data Cleaning Can Hurt Fairness in Machine Learning-based Decision Making

Noise-tolerant fair classification

Impacts of Dirty Data: and Experimental Evaluation

On The Impact of Machine Learning Randomness on Group Fairness

Data vs. Model Machine Learning Fairness Testing: An Empirical Study

Improving Fairness in Image Classification via Sketching

Don't Blame the Data, Blame the Model: Understanding Noise and Bias When Learning from Subjective Annotations

Who Decides if AI is Fair? The Labels Problem in Algorithmic Auditing

Fairness Evaluation in Presence of Biased Noisy Labels

How Quality Affects Deep Neural Networks in Fine-Grained Image Classification

How Far Can Fairness Constraints Help Recover From Biased Data?