Abstract:The objective image quality assessment (IQA) method was developed to replace subjective observer image quality evaluations in various applications. A reliable full reference color IQA method that allows reference and distorted images to be compared in a symmetric way is designed via three fusion steps described in this article. The three fusion steps include luminance channels fusion, similarity maps fusion, and features fusion. A fusion weight coefficient is designed to fuse the luminance channels of input images as an enhancement operator for features. The extracted SR (spectral residual), gradient, and chrominance features, by means of symmetric calculations for the reference and distorted images, are conducted via similarity fusion processing. Then, based on the human visual system (HVS) characteristics of achromatic and chromatic information receiving, a features fusion map represents the weighted sum of three similarity fusion maps. Finally, a deviation pooling strategy is utilized to export the quality score after features fusion. The novel method is called the features fusion similarity index (FFS). Various experiments are carried out based on statistical evaluation criteria to optimize the parameters of FFS, after which the proposed method of FFS is compared with other state-of-the-art IQA methods using large-scale benchmark single distortion databases. The results show that FFS performs with higher consistency with respect to subjective scores in terms of prediction accuracy, e.g., the PLCC can achieve at least 0.9116 accuracy and at most 0.9774 accuracy for four databases. In addition, the average running time of FFS is 0.0657 s-a value representing a higher computational efficiency.

Using Image Quality Assessment (IQA) Databases to Provide an Appraisal of the Ability of the Feature Selective Validation Method (FSV) to Compare Two-Dimensional Datasets

Comparison of Three-Dimensional Datasets by Using the Generalized N-Dimensional ( N-D) Feature Selective Validation (FSV) Technique

Image Quality Assessment Using a SVD-based Structural Projection

Applying the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) to an FSV-Based Comparison of Multiple Datasets

Fusing Deep Learning and Statistical Visual Features for No-Reference Image Quality Assessment.

Fovea Based Image Quality Assessment

Sparse feature fidelity for perceptual image quality assessment

Image Quality Assessment Based on Three Features Fusion in Three Fusion Steps

Image Quality Assessment Based on Multi-Feature Extraction and Synthesis with Support Vector Regression

Comparison of Data with Multiple Degrees of Freedom Utilizing the Feature Selective Validation Method

FSIM: A Feature Similarity Index for Image Quality Assessment

A Statistical Assessment of the Performance of FSV

Image quality assessment incorporating the interaction of spatial and spectral sensitivities of HVS

Image Quality Assessment Using Spatial Frequency Component

Investigating Confidence Histograms and Classification in Fsv: Part Ii-Float Fsv

Objective image quality assessment based on support vector regression

Image Quality Assessment Using Full-Parameter Singular Value Decomposition

Subjective and Objective Quality Assessment of Image: A Survey

A Comprehensive Performance Evaluation of Image Quality Assessment Algorithms

A Full-Reference Image Quality Assessment Model Based on Quadratic Gradient Magnitude and LOG Signal

Locally Adaptive Structure and Texture Similarity for Image Quality Assessment