Abstract:With the increasing demand for image-based applications, the efficient and reliable evaluation of image quality has increased in importance. Measuring the image quality is of fundamental importance for numerous image processing applications, where the goal of image quality assessment (IQA) methods is to automatically evaluate the quality of images in agreement with human quality judgments. Numerous IQA methods have been proposed over the past years to fulfill this goal. In this paper, a survey of the quality assessment methods for conventional image signals, as well as the newly emerged ones, which includes the high dynamic range (HDR) and 3-D images, is presented. A comprehensive explanation of the subjective and objective IQA and their classification is provided. Six widely used subjective quality datasets, and performance measures are reviewed. Emphasis is given to the full-reference image quality assessment (FR-IQA) methods, and 9 often-used quality measures (including mean squared error (MSE), structural similarity index (SSIM), multi-scale structural similarity index (MS-SSIM), visual information fidelity (VIF), most apparent distortion (MAD), feature similarity measure (FSIM), feature similarity measure for color images (FSIMC), dynamic range independent measure (DRIM), and tone-mapped images quality index (TMQI)) are carefully described, and their performance and computation time on four subjective quality datasets are evaluated. Furthermore, a brief introduction to 3-D IQA is provided and the issues related to this area of research are reviewed.

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

This paper aims to solve the key problems in image quality assessment (IQA). Especially in the context of the increasing demand for image - based applications, it is particularly important to evaluate image quality efficiently and reliably. The main objective of the paper is to automatically assess the quality of images so that it is consistent with human judgment of image quality. Specifically, the paper attempts to solve the following problems: 1. **Summarize the existing image quality assessment methods**: The paper provides a comprehensive review of subjective and objective quality assessment methods for traditional image signals and emerging high - dynamic - range (HDR) and 3D images. 2. **Classify and explain assessment methods**: It explains subjective and objective IQA and their classification in detail, emphasizes the full - reference image quality assessment (FR - IQA) method, and describes nine commonly used image quality metrics, including mean - square error (MSE), structural similarity index (SSIM), multi - scale structural similarity index (MS - SSIM), visual information fidelity (VIF), most apparent distortion (MAD), feature similarity measure (FSIM), feature similarity measure for color images (FSIM C), dynamic - range - independent measure (DRIM) and tone - mapped image quality index (TMQI). 3. **Performance evaluation**: The performance and computation time of these methods on four subjective quality data sets are evaluated. 4. **3D image quality assessment**: It briefly introduces 3D IQA, discusses the relevant issues in this field, and reviews some 3D image data sets. By solving the above problems, the paper aims to provide a comprehensive guide to image quality assessment methods for image - processing applications, helping researchers and engineers choose the assessment method that is most suitable for their application scenarios.

Subjective and Objective Quality Assessment of Image: A Survey

Overview of High Dynamic Range Image Quality Assessment

A Comprehensive Performance Evaluation of Image Quality Assessment Algorithms

A survey on IQA

Applicability Evaluation of Full-Reference Image Quality Assessment Methods for Computed Tomography Images

Image Quality Assessment and Human Visual System.

Cuid: A new study of perceived image quality and its subjective assessment

Mean Deviation Similarity Index: Efficient and Reliable Full-Reference Image Quality Evaluator

A New Image Coding Quality Assessment.

Subjective Quality Assessment for Images Generated by Computer Graphics

Related Work on Image Quality Assessment

Intensity-Sensitive Similarity Indexes for Image Quality Assessment

Image Quality Assessment Based on Multi-Feature Extraction and Synthesis with Support Vector Regression

Center Emphasized Visual Saliency and a Contrast-based Full Reference Image Quality Index

Image Quality Assessment: A Review to Full Reference Indexes

Image Quality Assessment with Visual Attention

Full Reference Objective Quality Assessment for Reconstructed Background Images

Comparison of Image Quality Models for Optimization of Image Processing Systems

Is the development of objective image quality assessment methods keeping pace with technological developments?

Subjective Assessment of Objective Image Quality Metrics Range Guaranteeing Visually Lossless Compression

Image Quality Assessment By Quantifying Discrepancies Of Multifractal Spectrums