Abstract:The brain is thought to generate internal predictions, based on previous statistical regularities in the environment, to optimise behaviour. Predictive processing has been repeatedly demonstrated and seemingly explains expectation suppression (ES), or the attenuation of neural activity in response to expected stimuli. However, the mechanisms behind ES are unclear and various models of the mechanisms supporting ES have been suggested with conflicting evidence. Sharpening models propose that expectations suppress neurons that are not tuned to the expected stimulus, increasing the signal-to-noise ratio for expected stimuli. In contrast, dampening models posit that expectations suppress neurons that are tuned to the expected stimuli, increasing the relative response amplitude for unexpected stimuli. Previous studies have used decoding analyses to examine these effects, with increases in decoding accuracy interpreted in terms of sharpening and decreases related to dampening. The opposing process theory (OPT) has suggested that both processes may occur at different time points, namely that initial sharpening is followed by later dampening of the neural representations of the expected stimulus as learning progresses. In this study we aim to test this theory and shed light on the dynamics of expectation effects, both at single trial level and over time. Thirty-one participants completed a statistical learning task consisting of paired scene categories whereby a “leading” image from one category is quickly followed by a “trailing” image from a different category. Multivariate EEG analyses focussed on decoding stimulus information related to the trailing image category. Within-trial, decoding analyses showed that stimulus expectation increased decoding accuracy at early latencies and decreased decoding accuracy at later latencies, in line with OPT. However, across trials, stimulus expectation decreased decoding accuracy in initial trials and increased decoding accuracy in later trials. We theorise that these dissociable dynamics of expectation effects within and across trials can be explained in the context of hierarchical learning mechanisms. Our single trial results provide evidence for the OPT, while our results over time suggest that sharpening and dampening effects emerge at different stages of learning.

Dissociable Effects of Cue Validity on Bias Formation and Reversal.

Cue Predictiveness and Uncertainty Determine Cue Representation During Visual Statistical Learning.

Prior probability cues bias sensory encoding with increasing task exposure

Human Reversal Learning under Conditions of Certain Versus Uncertain Outcomes.

How instructed knowledge shapes adaptive learning

Dissociable Contributions of Basolateral Amygdala and Ventrolateral Orbitofrontal Cortex to Flexible Learning Under Uncertainty

Post-decision biases reveal a self-consistency principle in perceptual inference

Influence of reinforcement and its omission on trial‐by‐trial changes of response bias in perceptual decision making

How previous experience shapes future affective subjective ratings: A follow-up study investigating implicit learning and cue ambiguity

The Sin of Prediction: When Mentally Simulated Alternatives Compete With Reality

Individual differences in the evolution of causal illusions

Signal detection analysis of contingency assessment: Associative interference and nonreinforcement impact cue-outcome contingency sensitivity, whereas cue density affects bias.

On the costs and benefits of repeating a nonspatial feature in an exogenous spatial cuing paradigm

The role of selection history in the learned predictiveness effect.

Multiple Cueing Dissociates Location- and Feature-Based Repetition Effects.

Inhibition of Return Revisited: Localized Inhibition on Top of a Pervasive Bias

Residual Information of Previous Decision Affects Evidence Accumulation in Current Decision

Dissociable dynamic effects of expectation during statistical learning

Racial stereotypes impair flexibility of emotional learning.

Feedback and Learning: The Causal Effects of Reversals on Judicial Decision-Making