Abstract:Abstract Actinic keratoses (AKs) are considered precursor lesions of cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma, with a reported conversion rate of 3–16%. Photodynamic therapy (PDT) is a widely approved therapy for AKs. Conventional PDT (c-PDT) using red light is limited by pain and a small treatment field. Daylight PDT (d-PDT), an approved alternative, is limited by geographical location and weather conditions. Simulated daylight PDT (sd-PDT) with light-emitting diode (LED) light sources is now commercially available due to robust evidence that these devices are effective, but the devices are limited by cost (∼€30 000). We hypothesized that sd-PDT with a 4000 K white-light LED floodlight, costing €961, is equally as effective and well tolerated as d-PDT in the treatment of AKs across treatment fields of up to 55 cm2 on the scalp. Twenty-two men with a mean age of 74.5 years (SD 7.0) and multiple scalp AKs were enrolled in this prospective, randomized, single-blinded study, which employed a split-scalp design to compare the effectiveness and adverse events of d-PDT and sd-PDT. Block randomization was used to determine which side of the scalp would be treated with d-PDT. Each patient received four treatments in total, two d-PDT and two sd-PDT, each a week apart. The AKs were counted, graded, mapped and photographed at baseline, at blinded 1- and 3-month reviews and at unblinded 6-, 9- and 12-month reviews. The primary endpoint was mean lesion-specific clearance, defined as the mean number and percentage of cleared AKs per treatment field at 3 months. At baseline, the mean (SD) number of AKs per field was 44 (17.4) for the d-PDT group and 45.5 (17.8) for the sd-PDT group (P = 0.4). The mean lesion-specific clearance (percentage reduction) in AKs per field was 35.3 (71.5%) for d-PDT and 35.0 (75.1%) for sd-PDT at 1 month (P > 0.99), 33.6 (66.4%) for d-PDT and 30.3 (61.6%) for sd-PDT at 3 months (P = 0.6). Both d-PDT and sd-PDT were effective, with a significant reduction in AKs from baseline at 1 and 3 months (P < 0.01). Pain was reported by 15 patients with d-PDT and 12 with sd-PDT (median maximum score out of 100, 3.5 vs. 4.5; P = 0.6). Erythema was observed in 17 after d-PDT and 15 after sd-PDT. On a scale of 0 (intolerable) to 10 (very tolerable), patients rated d-PDT as 10 and sd-PDT as 9.8 (P = 0.08). We conclude that sd-PDT with a 4000 K white-light LED floodlight is equally as effective and well tolerated as d-PDT and is an affordable treatment option not limited by pain, small treatment field, geographical location or weather conditions.

High efficacy of red light photodynamic therapy with 10 % aminolevulinic acid gel irrespective of the extent of keratinocyte atypia in actinic keratosis – exploratory post-hoc analysis of three pivotal phase III trials

Effective treatment of actinic keratosis on the hands with red light photodynamic therapy using BF-200 ALA

Therapeutic and fluorescence evaluation of 20% 5-aminolevulinic acid-mediated photodynamic therapy in actinic keratosis

Home- vs clinic-based daylight photodynamic therapy with 5-aminolevulinic acid nanoemulsion (BF-200 ALA) for actinic keratosis: A randomized, single-blind, prospective study

Efficacy and safety of microneedling, fractional CO2 laser, and cryotherapy combined with 5-aminolevulinic acid photodynamic therapy in the treatment of actinic keratosis: A multicenter prospective randomized controlled study

Long‐term follow‐up of a randomized, double‐blind, phase III, multi‐centre study to evaluate the safety and efficacy of field‐directed photodynamic therapy (PDT) of mild to moderate actinic keratosis using BF‐200 ALA versus placebo and the BF‐RhodoLED® lamp

Topical Photodynamic Therapy with Different Forms of 5-Aminolevulinic Acid in the Treatment of Actinic Keratosis

Topical 5-Aminolevulinic Acid-Mediated Photodynamic Therapy for Oral Verrucous Hyperplasia, Oral Leukoplakia and Oral Erythroleukoplakia

Clinical Pharmacokinetics and Safety of a 10% Aminolevulinic Acid Hydrochloride Nanoemulsion Gel (BF‐200 ALA) in Photodynamic Therapy of Patients Extensively Affected With Actinic Keratosis: Results of 2 Maximal Usage Pharmacokinetic Trials

Comparison of Efficacy, Adverse Effects and Costs Between 20 % ALA-PDT and 10 % ALA-PDT for the Treatment of Actinic Keratosis in Chinese Patients

Assessment of 5‐aminolaevulinic Acid Photodynamic Therapy (ALA‐PDT) in Chinese Patients with Actinic Keratosis: Correlation of Dermoscopic Features with Histopathology

Advances in Photodynamic Therapy for the Treatment of Actinic Keratosis and Nonmelanoma Skin Cancer: A Narrative Review

Plum-blossom needle tapping enhances the efficacy of ALA photodynamic therapy for facial actinic keratosis in Chinese population: a randomized, multicenter, prospective, and observer-blind study

5-Aminolaevulinic acid patch photodynamic therapy for the treatment of actinic keratoses: preliminary results from an Italian study in the real-life setting

Liquid nitrogen cryotherapy effectively and safely improves response of thick actinic keratoses lesions by 5-aminolevulinic acid-based photodynamic therapy: A randomized, prospective, single-blind trial

5-Aminolaevulinic acid-based photodynamic therapy for actinic keratosis in Chinese patients: A prospective multicenter study

Modified painless photodynamic therapy for facial multiple actinic keratosis in China: A prospective split‐face control study

P055 A randomized single-blinded prospective study to compare simulated daylight photodynamic therapy with natural daylight photodynamic therapy for the treatment of multiple actinic keratoses

The impact of occlusive vs non-occlusive application of methyl aminolevulinate on the efficacy and tolerability of daylight photodynamic therapy for actinic keratosis

Daylight photodynamic therapy with methyl aminolevulinate cream as a convenient, similarly effective, nearly painless alternative to conventional photodynamic therapy in actinic keratosis treatment: a randomized controlled trial

Photodynamic Therapy with 5-Aminolevulinic Acid Patch for the Treatment of Actinic Keratosis