[Effects of Different Drying Methods on Content of Bioactive Component and Antioxidant Activity in Lycium Ruthenicum].

Xia Zhang,Fang Zhang,Xiao-Juan Gao,Jing-Jiao Yong,Wen-Hua Zhang,Jian-Jun Zhao,Han-Qing Wang
DOI: https://doi.org/10.19540/j.cnki.cjcmm.20170907.011
2017-01-01
Abstract:To compare the appearances, tastes, contents of bioactive components and antioxidant activity of Lyceum ruthenicum under different drying methods, so as to direct its production practice. The folin-phenol colorimetric method, UV, extinction coefficient method and DPPH, as well as fluorescence recovery after photobleaching (FRAP) method to determine the contents of polyphenols, proanthocyanidins, total anthocyanin and antioxidant activity under different drying methods: vacuum freeze drying, low-temperature oven drying and air drying for L. ruthenicum. The results showed that the drying methods had certain effects on its appearances, tastes, contents of bioactive components and antioxidant activity. The appearances and tastes were best after the L. ruthenicum was dried by vacuum freeze drying, with significantly lower moisture than air drying method. The contents of total polyphenols, anthocyanin and proanthocyanidins were highest by air-drying but lowest by low temperature oven drying in L. ruthenicum. The scavenging ability to DPPH was strongest by freeze-drying and lowest by low temperature oven drying, while the antioxidant activity was strongest by air-drying in the FRAT method. In addition, the appearances and tastes were poor in air drying, with higher moisture but highest contents of the three bioactive components. Therefore, the drying methods for L. ruthenicum shall be comprehensively considered.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?