Longitudinal Assessment of Rabbit Renal Fibrosis Induced by Unilateral Ureteral Obstruction Using Two‐dimensional Susceptibility Weighted Imaging

Jing-Gang Zhang,Zhao-Yu Xing,Ting-Ting Zha,Xiao-Juan Tian,Ya-Nan Du,Jie Chen,Wei Xing
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/jmri.25915
IF: 4.4
2017-01-01
Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Abstract:BACKGROUNDPrevious studies indicated that two‐dimensional‐susceptibility weighted imaging (2D‐SWI) could serve as a useful biomarker for differentiating the grade of liver fibrosis.PURPOSETo evaluate the feasibility of 2D‐SWI in the dynamic quantification of renal fibrosis in a rabbit model.STUDY TYPE: Longitudinal study.ANIMAL MODELTwenty‐Four New Zealand White Rabbits including control group (n = 4); and renal fibrosis group (n = 20), by means of a unilateral ureteral obstruction (UUO) model.FIELD STRENGTH/SEQUENCEThe 3.0 T SWI using a 2D gradient‐echo sequence.ASSESSMENTThe relative SWI signal ratio(r) of cortical and medulla (r = SIrenal/SImuscle) was longitudinally assessed before ligation and on weeks 2, 4, 6, and 8 following ligation. Sirius Red staining was used to assess the degree of fibrosis in five high‐power fields.STATISTICAL TESTSThe repeated measures of analysis of variance and linear regression analysis.RESULTSBoth the cortical and medullary r values were significantly higher in the UUO kidneys at week 2 compared with the kidneys before ligation. Over the course of UUO progression, significant changes occurred in the cortical and medullary r values in vivo and fibrosis scores in vitro (all P values < 0.05). The r values gradually decreased, while the fibrosis scores gradually increased over 8 weeks following ligation. The linear regression analysis showed a strong and significant correlation between cortical and medullary r values and the pathologic fibrosis scores (R2 = 0.91, 0.81, respectively).DATA CONCLUSIONThe SWI sequence could provide a quantitative evaluation of renal fibrosis during UUO progression.Level of Evidence: 2Technical Efficacy: Stage 1J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2018;47:1572–1577.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?