Abstract:Objective The debate on the superiority of single- or double-bundle for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction has not ceased. The comparative studies on intra-articular biomechanics after different surgical reconstructions are rare. This study is to evaluate the biomechanical stress distribution intra-knee after single- and double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction by three-dimensional finite element analysis, and to observe the change of stress concentration under the condition of vertical gradient loads. Methods In this study, magnetic resonance imaging data were extracted from patients and healthy controls for biomechanical analysis. Patients included in the three models were matched in age and sex. The strength and distribution of induced stresses were analyzed in two frequently used procedures, anatomical single-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction and anatomical double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction, using femoral-graft-tibial system under different loads, to mimic a post-operation mechanical motion. The three-dimensional finite-element models for normal ligament and two surgical methods were applied. A vertical force simulating daily walking was performed on the models to assess the interfacial stresses and displacements of intra-articular tissues and ligaments. The evaluation results mainly included the stress of each part of ligament and meniscus. The stress values of different parts of three models were extracted and compared. Results The stress of ligament/graft at femoral side of three finite-element models was significantly higher than at tibial side, while the highest level was observed in single-bundle reconstruction finite-element model. With the increase of force, the maximum stress in the medial (7.1-7.1 MPa) and lateral (4.9-7.4 MPa) meniscus of single-bundle reconstruction finite-element model shifted from the anterior horn to the central area (p = 0.0161, 0.0479, respectively). The stress was shown to be at a lower level at femoral side and posterior cruciate ligament of intra-knee in two reconstruction finite-element models than that in normal finite-element models, while presented higher level at the tibial side than normal knee (p = 0.3528). The displacement of the femoral side and intra-knee areas in reconstruction finite-element models was greater than that in normal finite-element model (p = 0.0855). Conclusion Compared with the single-bundle technique, the graft of double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction has better stress dissipation effect and can prevent postoperative meniscus tear more effectively.

In Vivo Kinematics and Cruciate Ligament Tension Are Not Restored to Normal After Bicruciate-Preserving Arthroplasty

In-vivo Elongation of Anterior and Posterior Cruciate Ligament in Bi-Cruciate Retaining Total Knee Arthroplasty.

Bicruciate-retaining total knee arthroplasty procedure reduced tensile force in the middle and posterior components of lateral collateral ligament during deep knee flexion activities with no effect on tensile force of the medial collateral ligament

In Vivo Function of Posterior Cruciate Ligament Before and after Posterior Cruciate Ligament-Retaining Total Knee Arthroplasty

Knee joint laxity is restored in a bi-cruciate retaining TKA-design

Intraoperative knee kinematics measured by computer‐assisted navigation and intraoperative ligament balance have the potential to predict postoperative knee kinematics

Load-Dependent Characteristics of Cruciate-Retaining and Posterior-Stabilized Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Biomechanical Study

Articular contact kinematics of the knee before and after a cruciate retaining total knee arthroplasty.

Influence of posterior cruciate ligament tension on tibiofemoral and patellofemoral joint contact mechanics in cruciate-retaining total knee replacement: a combined musculoskeletal multibody and finite-element simulation

Intra-Articular Biomechanical Changes of the Meniscus and Ligaments During Stance Phase of Gait Circle after Different Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Surgical Procedures: A Finite Element Analysis

Does Cruciate Ligament Substitution and Implant Asymmetry Make a Difference for Total Knee Arthroplasty Kinematics? A Multi-Implant Evaluation

Bi‐Cruciate Retaining Total Knee Arthroplasty Does Not Restore Native Tibiofemoral Articular Contact Kinematics During Gait

Short-term effect of anterior cruciate ligament deficiency on Oxford unicompartmental knee arthroplasty

A comparison of clinical and radiological parameters with two arthroscopic techniques for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction

Coronal Laxity at Flexion is Larger After Posterior-Stabilized Total Knee Arthroplasty Than With Cruciate-Retaining Procedures

Analysis of differences in laxities and neutral positions from native after kinematically aligned TKA using cruciate retaining implants

Characteristics of the isokinetic performance of patients with injured cruciate ligaments

Two Different Knee Rotational Instabilities Occur With Anterior Cruciate Ligament and Anterolateral Ligament Injuries: A Robotic Study on Anterior Cruciate Ligament and Extra-articular Reconstructions in Restoring Rotational Stability

Elongation of the collateral ligaments after cruciate retaining total knee arthroplasty and the maximum flexion of the knee.

Comparison of the in vivo kinematics between robotic‐assisted Bi‐cruciate retaining and Bi‐cruciate stabilised total knee arthroplasty

In situ forces of the anterior and posterior cruciate ligaments in high knee flexion: an in vitro investigation