Abstract:OBJECTIVE:To evaluate the value of parameters derived from intravoxel incoherent motion diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging in differentiating histopathological subtypes of renal cell carcinoma (RCC).METHODS:Between May 2014 and December 2015, a total of 69 patients who were surgically and pathologically diagnosed as renal cell carcinoma were recruited for the study. We examined 61 clear cell RCC (ccRCC), and 8 non-clear cell carcinoma (non-ccRCC, including 7 chromophobe RCC and 1 papillary RCC). All the ccRCC were divided into well differentiated group (n=46), moderately differentiated group (n=8), and poorly differentiated group (n=7). In addition to routine renal magnetic resonance imaging examination performed on a 3.0-Tesla MR system, all patients were imaged with axial intravoxel incoherent motion diffusion-weighted imaging. Using biexponential model, we calculated the diffusion coefficient (D), pseudodiffusion coefficient (D(*)), and perfusion fraction (f).RESULTS:The D and f values of the ccRCC were higher (each P<0.05) than that for non-ccRCC [D (1.29±0.30)×10(-3)mm(2)/s, D(*) (42.92±20.21)×10(-3)mm(2)/s, and f (35.71±6.61)% versus D (0.78±0.23)×10(-3)mm(2)/s, D(*) (32.60±11.33)×10(-3)mm(2)/s, and f (21.52±8.44)% ]. In the well differentiated group of ccRCC, we found D of (1.36±0.29)×10(-3)mm(2)/s, D(*) (38.39±18.51)×10(-3)mm(2)/s, and f (36.40±6.96)%. The D, D(*,) f values of moderately differentiated lesions were (1.10±0.24)×10(-3)mm(2)/s, (59.90±20.23)×10(-3) mm(2)/s, and (32.88±4.02)%, respectively, those of the poorly differentiated group were (1.03±0.16)×10(-3)mm(2)/s, (53.28±18.74)×10(-3)mm(2)/s, and (34.42±6.21)%. The well differentiated group of ccRCC showed a higher D value than the moderately differentiated and poorly differentiated groups (each P<0.05). D(*) values were significantly lower for the well differentiated group than for the moderately differentiated group (P<0.05). The sensitivity and specificity of D values were 90.2% and 87.5% when focusing on the differentiation of ccRCC. For the diagnosis of ccRCC, the sensitivity and specificity of f values were 98.4% and 75.0%, respectively.CONCLUSIONS:IVIM-DWI can provide certain reliable value in evaluating pathological subtype and differentiation degree of renal cell carcinomas. D and f values are useful to distinguish ccRCC from non-ccRCC. D value is also promising for estimating the differentiation degree of ccRCC, and to indicate the biological behavior of RCC.

The Study of Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma with MR Diffusion Kurtosis Tensor Imaging and Its Histopathologic Correlation.

Characterization of clear cell renal cell carcinoma with diffusion kurtosis imaging: correlation between diffusion kurtosis parameters and tumor cellularity.

Diffusion-weighted and Diffusion Kurtosis Imaging Analysis of Microstructural Differences in Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma: a Comparative Study

Differentiating between malignant and benign renal tumors: do IVIM and diffusion kurtosis imaging perform better than DWI?

WHO/ISUP Grade and Pathological T Stage of Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma: Value of ZOOMit Diffusion Kurtosis Imaging and Chemical Exchange Saturation Transfer Imaging

Grading Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma Grade Using Diffusion Relaxation Correlated MR Spectroscopic Imaging

Value of Diffusion Kurtosis Imaging in Assessment of Pathological Grade of Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma

Diffusion kurtosis versus diffusion-weighted MRI in differentiating clear cell renal cell carcinoma and renal angiomyolipoma with minimal fat: a comparative study

Diffusion Kurtosis Imaging Features of Renal Cell Carcinoma: a Preliminary Study.

Magnetic Resonance Diffusion Kurtosis Imaging in Differential Diagnosis of Benign and Malignant Renal Tumors.

Evaluation of Cerebral Glioma Using 3T Diffusion Kurtosis Tensor Imaging and the Relationship Between Diffusion Kurtosis Metrics and Tumor Cellularity

Diffusion Kurtosis Imaging to Assess Correlations with Clinicopathologic Factors for Bladder Cancer: a Comparison Between the Multi-B Value Method and the Tensor Method

Comparison of Monoexponential, Biexponential, Stretched-Exponential, and Kurtosis Models of Diffusion-Weighted Imaging in Differentiation of Renal Solid Masses.

Comparison of Utility of Histogram Apparent Diffusion Coefficient and R2*For Differentiation of Low-Grade from High-Grade Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma

Comparative Study of Conventional Diffusion- Weighted Imaging and Introvoxel Incoherent Motion in Assessment of Pathological Grade of Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma

Grading of clear cell renal cell carcinoma by using monoexponential, biexponential, and stretched exponential diffusion-weighted MR imaging

Breast Cancer: Diffusion Kurtosis MR Imaging-Diagnostic Accuracy and Correlation with Clinical-Pathologic Factors.

Investigation of Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma Grades Using Diffusion-Relaxation Correlation Spectroscopic Imaging with Optimized Spatial-Spectrum Analysis

[Application of Diffusion-Weighted Intravoxel Incoherent Motion Imaging in Diagnosis of Renal Cell Carcinoma Subtypes].

Diffusion Kurtosis Imaging Study of Rectal Adenocarcinoma Associated with Histopathologic Prognostic Factors: Preliminary Findings.

A Study on Diffusion and Kurtosis Features of Cervical Cancer Based on Non-Gaussian Diffusion Weighted Model.