Comparison of Different Shielding Methods in Acquisition of Physiological Signals.

Yanbing Jiang,Ning Ji,Hui Wang,Xueyu Liu,Yanjuan Geng,Peng Li,Shixiong Chen,Guanglin Li
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/embc.2017.8037321
2017-01-01
Abstract:Power line interference in the surrounding environment could usually introduce many difficulties when collecting and analyzing physiological signals. Since power line interference is usually several orders of amplitude larger than the physiological electrical signals, methods of suppressing power line interference should be considered during the signal acquisition. Many studies used a hardware or software band-stop filter to suppress power line interference but it could easily cause attenuations and distortions to the signal of interest. In this study, two kinds of methods that used different signals to drive the shields of the electrodes were proposed to reduce the impacts of power line interference. Three channels of two physiological signals (ECG and EMG) were simultaneously collected when the electrodes were not shielded (No-Shield), shielded by ground signals (GND-Shield) and shielded by buffered signals of the corresponding electrodes (Active-Shield), respectively, on a custom hardware platform based on TI ADS1299. The results showed that power line interference would be significantly suppressed when using shielding approaches, and the Active-Shield method could achieve the best performance with a power line interference reduction up to 36dB. The study suggested that the Active-Shield method at the analog front-end was a great candidate to reduce power line interference in routine acquisitions of physiological signals.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?