Biometric Differences Between Unilateral Chronic Primary Angle Closure Glaucoma and Fellow Non-Glaucomatous Eyes

Wei Wang,Xinyi Li,Shida Chen,Wenbin Huang,Xiulan Zhang
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/08820538.2017.1375121
2017-01-01
Seminars in Ophthalmology
Abstract:Purpose: To compare biometric differences between eyes with unilateral chronic primary angle-closure glaucoma (PACG) and fellow non-glaucomatous eyes in the same patient. Methods: Clinical data and imaging records of 17 patients with unilateral PACG were retrospectively reviewed. The fellow eyes with primary angle-closure (PAC) or primary angle-closure suspected (PACS) were grouped in Group 1. The PACG eyes were set as Group 2. The biometric parameters of both eyes were measured by IOL-Master, anterior segment optical coherence tomography (AS-OCT), and swept source OCT. Results: The iris area in Group 1 was significantly thicker than that in Group 2 (1.590 +/- 0.267 versus 1.365 +/- 0.352, P = 0.016). Choroidal thickness in the macular region was thicker in Group 1 than in Group 2, with statistical significance at inner temporal grid (282.7 +/- 121.1 versus 191.6 +/- 90.3, P = 0.036), central field (297.4 +/- 130.6 versus 200.1 +/- 96.3, P = 0.029), inner nasal grid (283.1 +/- 128.3 versus 194.8 +/- 91.8, P = 0.040), and average value (265.3 +/- 105.6 versus 191.1 +/- 87.0, P = 0.049). Group 1 also had thicker peripapillary choroidal thickness at 1 o'clock (141.4 +/- 68.4 versus 101.8 +/- 39.0, P = 0.025) and 12 o'clock (141.5 +/- 82.3 versus 104.5 +/- 44.6, P = 0.037) compared to Group 2. The multivariate logistic regression analyses showed that only intraocular pressure was independently associated with PACG and explained 58.3% variance of PACG. Conclusions: In unilateral PACG, there was significant inter-eye difference in anterior and posterior segment parameters. Longitudinal comparisons are required to further understand the differences in pathology of angle closures.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?