TICS-M scores in an oldest-old normative cohort identified by computable phenotype

Gelan Ying Ambar Perez-Lao Tamare Adrien Demetrius Maraganore David Marra Glenn Smith a Department of Clinical and Health Psychology,University of Florida,Gainesville,FL,USAb Department of Neurology,Tulane University School of Medicine,New Orleans,LA,USAc VA Boston Health Care System,Boston,MA,USA
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13854046.2024.2374894
2024-07-14
The Clinical Neuropsychologist
Abstract:Objective: To (1) examine the distribution of Telephone Interview for Cognitive Status modified (TICS-m) scores in oldest-old individuals (age 85 and above) identified as cognitively healthy by a previously validated electronic health records-based computable phenotype (CP) and (2) to compare different cutoff scores for cognitive impairment in this population. Method: CP identified 24,024 persons, 470 were contacted and 252 consented and completed the assessment. Associations of TICS-m score with age, sex, and educational categories ( 16 years) were examined. The number of participants perceived as impaired was studied with commonly used cutoff scores (27–31). Results: TICS-m score ranged from 18 to 44 with a mean of 32.6 (SD = 4.7) in older adults aged 85–99 years old. A linear regression model including (range-restricted) age, education, and sex, showed beta estimates comparable to previous findings. Different cutoff scores (27 to 31) generated slightly lower MCI and dementia prevalence rates of participants meeting the criteria for the impairments than studies of younger elderly using traditional recruitment methods. Conclusions: The use of validated computable phenotype to identify a normative cohort generated a normative distribution for the TICS-m consistent with prior findings from more effortful approaches to cohort identification and established expected TICS-m performance in the oldest-old population.
psychology, clinical,clinical neurology
What problem does this paper attempt to address?