Cognitive function based on theta-gamma coupling vs. clinical diagnosis in older adults with mild cognitive impairment with or without major depressive disorder

Heather Brooks,Wei Wang,Reza Zomorrodi,Daniel M. Blumberger,Christopher R. Bowie,Zafiris J. Daskalakis,Corinne E. Fischer,Alastair J. Flint,Nathan Herrmann,Sanjeev Kumar,Krista L. Lanctôt,Linda Mah,Benoit H. Mulsant,Bruce G. Pollock,Aristotle N. Voineskos,Tarek K. Rajji,Meryl A. Butters,Angela Golas,Ariel Graff,James L. Kennedy,Lillian Lourenco,Shima Ovaysikia,Mark Rapoport,Kevin E. Thorpe,Nicolaas P. L. G. Verhoeff,Aristotle Voineskos,the PACt-MD Study Group
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41398-024-02856-5
2024-03-21
Translational Psychiatry
Abstract:Whether individuals with mild cognitive impairment (MCI) and a history of major depressive disorder (MDD) are at a higher risk for cognitive decline than those with MCI alone is still not clear. Previous work suggests that a reduction in prefrontal cortical theta phase-gamma amplitude coupling (TGC) is an early marker of cognitive impairment. This study aimed to determine whether using a TGC cutoff is better at separating individuals with MCI or MCI with remitted MDD (MCI+rMDD) on cognitive performance than their clinical diagnosis. Our hypothesis was that global cognition would differ more between TGC-based groups than diagnostic groups. We analyzed data from 128 MCI (mean age: 71.8, SD: 7.3) and 85 MCI+rMDD (mean age: 70.9, SD: 4.7) participants. Participants completed a comprehensive neuropsychological battery; TGC was measured during the N-back task. An optimal TGC cutoff was determined during the performance of the 2-back. This TGC cutoff was used to classify participants into low vs. high-TGC groups. We then compared Cohen's d of the difference in global cognition between the high and low TGC groups to Cohen's d between the MCI and MCI+rMDD groups. We used bootstrapping to determine 95% confidence intervals for Cohen's d values using the whole sample. As hypothesized, Cohen's d for the difference in global cognition between the TGC groups was larger (0.64 [0.32, 0.88]) than between the diagnostic groups (0.10 [0.004, 0.37]) with a difference between these two Cohen's d' s of 0.54 [0.10, 0.80]. Our findings suggest that TGC is a useful marker to identify individuals at high risk for cognitive decline, beyond clinical diagnosis. This could be due to TGC being a sensitive marker of prefrontal cortical dysfunction that would lead to an accelerated cognitive decline.
psychiatry
What problem does this paper attempt to address?