Abstract:Background: An effective emergency triage system is lacking in mainland China. The Chinese Emergency Triage Scale (CETS) was developed based on vital complaints and vital parameters, according to Chinese data. Objective: The aim of this study was to assess the reliability and validity of the CETS by emergency department (ED) nurses in eight EDs in mainland China. Design: A cross-sectional multi-center study was conducted. Settings: Eight EDs in the eastern, western, northern, and central areas of mainland China. Participants: A total of 51 ED nurses and 8000 active ED patients participated in the study between May and September 2018 in eight EDs. Methods: Standardized triage scenarios and active patients were assigned to nurses who used the CETS for evaluative purposes. Accuracy was defined by concordance with the key for the scenarios and was calculated as percentages. Inter-rater reliability was measured by weighted kappa to compare the triage nurse's rating with the research nurse's acuity level for each patient. The triage time and clinical outcome of 1000 active patients per site also were collected. The criterion-related validity of the CETS was evaluated; criteria included ED mortality, number of patients discharged, and admission to ICU or general ward. The relationship between the CETS acuity levels triaged by the research nurse and four possible outcomes was assessed with a cross-classification table, using a chi-square test. The ability of the CETS to predict ED mortality was assessed via the receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) area under the curve (AUC). Results: Mean pooled accuracy from all sites was 89.4% (95% CI = 86.9%-91.8%), and the proportion of over-triage slightly exceeded under-triage (6.5% vs. 4.1%). There was no difference in accuracy between sites or according to nurse experience. Inter-rater reliability values for triage nurses and research nurses were 0.96 (95% CI = 0.95-0.97), based on the quadratic weight kappa. Trauma cases were assigned to triage with greater accuracy than were nontrauma cases, both for the scenarios and for active patients. The average triage time of ED nurses in all sites was 151.5 +/- 26.3 s, using the computer-based triage instrument. The chi-square test showed that there was a significant difference in triage time between the CETS levels (p < 0.001). The AUC was 0.968 (95% CI = 0.958-0.979). Conclusions: The CETS is a reliable system for ED triage and can promote rapid and effective triage in mainland China. (C) 2019 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license. (http://creativecommons.orgilicenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/)

Evaluation of the Simplified Therapeutic Intervention Scoring System: Chinese Version.

Translation, Revision and Assessment of Reliability and Validity of the Assessment of Interprofessional Team Collaboration Scale

Testing of Reliability and Validity of the Intensive Care Nursing Scoring System

Reliability and Validity of the Four-Level Chinese Emergency Triage Scale in Mainland China: A Multicenter Assessment

Using Therapeutic Intervention Scoring System to Assess the Nursing Workload in a Surgical Intensive Care Unit

Research of Using TISS to Evaluate Nursing Workload in a Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgical ICU

The Chinese Language Version of the Abbreviated Burn Specific Health Scale: a Validation Study.

Reliability and Validity of an Instrument to Assess Pediatric Inpatients' Experience of Care in China.

Chinesisation, Adaptation and Validation of the Chelsea Critical Care Physical Assessment Tool in Critically Ill Patients: a Cross-Sectional Observational Study.

Development and Psychometric Tests of a Chinese Version of the SF-36 Health Survey Scales.

Reliability and validity assessment of the Chinese version of the Intrahospital Transport Safety Scale (IHTSS) in intensive care units

Reliability and validity of the Chinese version of the functional status score for the ICU (FSS-ICU) after translation and cross-cultural adaptation

Application of APACHE Ⅱ Scoring System in Nursing Administration of SICU

[Compilation and Evaluation of Perioperative Nursing Quality Assessment Scale].

Reliability and Validity of the Chinese Version of the Student Nurse Stress Index Scale ( SNSI-CHI)

The Abcd Patient Classification Tool For Nurse-To-Patient Assignment To Improve Nursing Workload Balance: A Multi-Center Study

Psychometric evaluation of the Chinese version of the Burnout Syndrome Assessment Scale in nurses

Cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the Chinese version of the intensive care oral care frequency and assessment scale

Chinesization on Perme Intensive Care Unit Mobility Scale and assessment on its reliability and validity

The Chinese Version of Instrument of Professional Attitude for Student Nurses (IPASN): Assessment of Reliability and Validity.

Translation, cross-cultural adaptation, reliability, and validity of the Chinese version of the intensive care unit environment stress scale for pediatric patients