Radiographic Measurement of Femoral Lateral Bowing and Distal Femoral Condyle Resection Thickness: Variances and Effects on Total Knee Arthroplasty Planning

Pei-Hui Wu,Zhi-Qi Zhang,Ming-Hui Gu,Xiao-Yi Zhao,Yan Kang,Wei-Ming Liao,Ming Fu
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4103/0366-6999.217083
IF: 6.133
2017-01-01
Chinese Medical Journal
Abstract:Background: Accurate evaluation of the plain radiography of lower limb is critical for preoperative planning of total knee arthroplasty (TKA). We aimed to investigate the effect of femoral lateral bowing and rotation on the radiographic measurements of distal femoral condyle resection thickness (DRT) and the distal femoral resection valgus angle (FVA). Methods: We analyzed 246 three-dimensional femoral models generated from computed tomography images of 123 patients, acquiring projected contours in seven positions - 20 degrees and 10 degrees internal rotation; 0 degrees rotation; 10 degrees, 20 degrees, 30 degrees, and 40 degrees external rotation - for each model. Medial and lateral condyle DRTs, femoral shaft lateral bowing angle (FBA), and distal FVA were determined for each position. Linear mixed effect model was used to determine the effect of degree of femur rotation on repeated measurements of DRT or FVA. Results: FBA significantly affected the FVA and DRT (Pearson's R = 0.767 and -0.408, respectively; P < 0.000). Samples were divided into three groups according to the FBA measured in neutral position: FBA < 0 degrees: DRT 3.75 +/- 1.30 mm, FVA 4.53 degrees +/- 1.27 degrees; FBA > 0 degrees but < 3 degrees: DRT 3.39 +/- 1.31 mm, FVA 5.92 degrees +/- 1.31 degrees; FBA > 3 degrees: DRT 2.22 +/- 1.31 mm, FVA 7.37 degrees +/- 1.31 degrees. From simulated 20 degrees internal rotation to 40 degrees external rotation in each femoral model, the average variation ranges of radiographically measured DRT, FVA, and FBA were 0.50 +/- 0.28 mm, 2.93 degrees +/- 0.96 degrees, and 10.33 degrees +/- 1.90 degrees, respectively, with no significant differences among the FBA groups. The degree of femoral rotation significantly affected the FVA (F = 62.148, P < 0.000), whereas there was no effect on condyle resection thickness (F = 0.4705, P = 0.494). Conclusions: Axial femoral rotation has less effect on radiographic measurements of differences in the DRT than on those of the distal FVA.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?