Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement in Patients with Non-Calcific Aortic Stenosis.

Tian-Yuan Xiong,Yuan Feng,Yan-Biao Liao,Yi-Jian Li,Zhen-Gang Zhao,Xin Wei,Yuan-Ning Xu,Jia-Fu Wei,Yong Peng,Nicolo Piazza,Darren Mylotte,Mao Chen
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4244/eij-d-17-00584
2018-01-01
EuroIntervention
Abstract:Aims: Limited information exists describing the results of transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) in patients with symptomatic severe non-calcific aortic stenosis (AS). We aimed to compare procedural, echocardiographic, and clinical outcomes among patients with non-calcific AS with those of senile calcific AS undergoing TAVR. Methods and results: We retrospectively identified patients with non-calcific AS who received TAVR with self-expanding transcatheter heart valves in our centre. Clinical and echocardiographic outcomes, and post-procedural multi-detector computed tomography (MDCT) measures were compared to those in patients undergoing TAVR for calcific AS. Among 136 patients, 21 patients (15.4%) with native leaflet thickening and minimal calcification were identified (non-calcific group). The patients were significantly younger in the non-calcific group (70.0 [64.0-75.5] vs. 75.0 [69.0-78.0] years) with comparable STS-PROM scores (6.7 [4.8-8.9] vs. 8.2 [4.8-10.9] %). Predilation was performed less frequently (42.9% vs. 93.9%) and post-dilation more often (71.4% vs. 42.6%) in the non-calcific group. Both 30-day and one-year mortality were similar between groups (0% vs. 7.8% and 0% vs. 17.6%). Rates of post-implantation paravalvular leak >= mild at six months (17.6% 25.7%) were comparable despite lower implantation depth among non-calcific AS patients (10.9 +/- 5.7 vs. 7.2 +/- 4.3 mm) on post-implantation MDCT. Conclusions: TAVR with self-expanding transcatheter heart valves appears to be safe and effective in patients with non-calcific AS.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?