Reply to Schöngart Et Al.: Forest Resilience Variation Across Amazonian Floodplains.

Bernardo M Flores,Milena Holmgren,Chi Xu,Egbert H van Nes,Catarina C Jakovac,Rita C G Mesquita,Marten Scheffer

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1714595114

2017-01-01

Abstract:Our recent findings that floodplain ecosystems harbor the most fragile forests of the Amazon (1) was seen by Schongart et al. (2) as an oversimplification of a complex ecosystem. They argue that the majority of floodplain forests are associated with fertile soils, and should therefore be highly resilient. Indeed, the differences between nutrient-rich white-water and nutrient-poor black-water systems have been long-known (3). However, as our study (1) illustrates, alternate perspectives can sometimes reveal surprising features of a well-known system. Our study compares the resilience of floodplain and upland forests with observations at the basin scale. Moreover, despite the existence of detailed field evidence on the vulnerability of black-water forests to fire (4⇓–6), the scale and implications of this disturbance factor were still broadly neglected. Here we expand our previous analyses (1) to explore how floodplain forest resilience varies across subbasins and regions, testing hypotheses raised by Schongart et al. (2). In the past two decades, drought events allowed wildfires to penetrate Amazonian forests, challenging … [↵][1]1To whom correspondence should be addressed. Email: mflores.bernardo{at}gmail.com. [1]: #xref-corresp-1-1