Experience of Nurses with Intravenous Fluid Monitoring for Patient Safety: A Qualitative Descriptive Study
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2147/RMHP.S374563
2022-09-22
Risk Management and Healthcare Policy
Abstract:Jeongok Park, 1 Sang Bin You, 2 Hyejin Kim, 3 Cheolmin Park, 4 Gi Wook Ryu, 5 Seongae Kwon, 2 Youngkyung Kim, 6 Sejeong Lee, 6 Kayoung Lee 7 1 Mo-Im Kim Nursing Research Institute, Yonsei University College of Nursing, Seoul, South Korea; 2 Yonsei University College of Nursing, Seoul, South Korea; 3 Severance Hospital, Yonsei University Health System, Seoul, South Korea; 4 Department of Materials Science and Engineering, Yonsei University, Seoul, South Korea; 5 Department of Nursing, Hansei University, Gunpo-si, South Korea; 6 College of Nursing and Brain Korea 21 FOUR Project, Yonsei University, Seoul, South Korea; 7 Gachon University College of Nursing, Incheon, South Korea Correspondence: Kayoung Lee, Gachon University College of Nursing, 191 Hambakmoero, Yeonsu-gu, Incheon, 21936, South Korea, Tel +82-32-820-4227, Email Purpose: Medication administration is a complex process and constitutes a substantial component of nursing practice that is closely linked to patient safety. Although intravenous fluid administration is one of the most frequently performed nursing tasks, nurses' experiences with intravenous rate control have not been adequately studied. This study aimed to explore nurses' experiences with infusion nursing practice to identify insights that could be used in interventions to promote safe medication administration. Patients and methods: This qualitative descriptive study used focus group interviews of 20 registered nurses who frequently administered medications in tertiary hospitals in South Korea. Data were collected through five semi-structured focus group interviews, with four nurses participating in each interview. We conducted inductive and deductive content analysis based on the 11 key topics of patient safety identified by the World Health Organization. Reporting followed the consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ) checklist. Results: Participants administered infusions in emergency rooms, general wards, and intensive care units, including patients ranging from children to older adults. Two central themes were revealed: human factors and systems. Human factors consisted of two sub-themes including individuals and team players, while systems encompassed three sub-themes including institutional policy, culture, and equipment. Conclusion: This study found that nurses experienced high levels of stress when administering infusions in the correct dose and rate for patient safety. Administering and monitoring infusions were complicated because nursing processes interplay with human and system factors. Future research is needed to develop nursing interventions that include human and system factors to promote patient safety by reducing infusion-related errors. Keywords: intravenous infusions, medication errors, medication systems, nurses, patient safety Intravenous (IV) administration of medications is one of the most common processes in the treatment of hospitalized patients, and a major component of nursing practice. During the medication administration process, errors occurred in about 30% of IV medication administration, 1 which in turn threatened patient safety and increased health care costs. In the US, medical errors cost the lives of up to 251,000 people annually, 2 and each year, the overall cost of caring for patients after medical errors is $20 billion. 3 According to the National Reporting and Learning Service, 4 the rates of medication administration errors (MAEs) are still unacceptably high. Since the IV medication administration process is composed of multiple and complex steps, comprehensive factors that lead to medication errors should be considered to prevent possible errors and improve patient safety. MAEs with IV medications have a higher risk of significant adverse effects than any other administration route because the IV route leads to near-instant absorption and dispersion into the blood stream. 5 Approximately 10% of MAEs were found to be IV-related, and 57.9% of the reported IV infusion-related errors were related to "wrong rate." 1 Previous studies have identified diverse aspects of risk factors for general medication errors. Ahn et al 6 focused on communications during handovers, which classified major themes based on need for partnership, lack of pertinent patient information, and interruptions/distractions. Daker-White et al 7 determined that patient, staff, system, or organizational factors are associated with patient safety. In addition, Parry et al 8 identified that "environment" and "person" were the co -Abstract Truncated-
health care sciences & services,health policy & services