Abstract:BackgroundCraniofacial skeletal discrepancies have been associated with upper airway dimensions.ObjectiveTo identify differences in upper airway volume across different sagittal and vertical skeletal patterns.Search methodsUnrestricted literature searches in eight databases/registers for human studies until May 2023.Selection criteriaCross-sectional studies measuring upper airway volumes using three-dimensional imaging in healthy patients of different sagittal (Class I, Class II, and Class III) or vertical (normodivergent, hypodivergent, and hyperdivergent) craniofacial morphology.Data collection and analysisDuplicate independent study selection, data extraction, and risk of bias assessment. Random-effects frequentist network meta-analysis was performed followed by subgroup-analyses and assessment of the quality of clinical recommendations (confidence in effect estimates) with the CINeMA (Confidence in Network Meta-Analysis) approach.ResultsSeventy publications pertaining to 66 unique studies were included with 56 studies (5734 patients) contributing to meta-analyses. Statistically significant differences were found for total pharyngeal airway volume, with Class II having decreased airway volume (−2256.06 mm 3 ; 95% Confidence Interval [CI] −3201.61 to −1310.51 mm 3 ) and Class III increased airway volume (1098.93 mm 3 ; 95% CI 25.41 to 2172.45 mm 3 ) compared to Class I. Significant airway volume reductions for Class II were localized mostly at the oropharynx, followed by the palatopharynx, and the glossopharynx. Significant airway volume increases for Class III were localized mostly at the oropharynx, followed by the intraoral cavity, and hypopharynx. Statistically significant differences according to vertical skeletal configuration were seen only for the oropharynx, where hyperdivergent patients had reduced volumes compared to normodivergent patients (−1716.77 mm 3 ; 95% CI −3296.42 to −137.12 mm 3 ). Airway differences for Class II and Class III configurations (compared to Class I) were more pronounced in adults than in children and the confidence for all estimates was very low according to CINeMA.ConclusionsConsiderable differences in upper airway volume were found between sagittal and vertical skeletal configurations. However, results should be interpreted with caution due to the high risk of bias, owing to the retrospective study design, inconsistencies in anatomic compartment boundaries used, samples of mixed children–adult patients, and incomplete reporting.Clinical Trial RegistrationPROSPERO (CRD42022366928).

Upper Airway Asymmetry in Skeletal Class III Malocclusions with Mandibular Deviation

Three-dimensional Analysis of Upper Airway Morphology in Skeletal Class III Patients with and Without Mandibular Asymmetry.

A Preliminary Study of Buccal and Lingual Alveolar Bone Thickness of Posterior Teeth in Patients with Skeletal Class III Malocclusion and Mandibular Asymmetry

Relationship Between Dental Arch Anomalies and Craniofacial Characteristics in Patients with Deviated Mandible

Maxillofacial 3-dimensional morphological analysis for patients with Class III malocclusion and facial asymmetry]

Characteristics of Midface Asymmetry in Skeletal Class III Malocclusion Using Three-Dimensional Analysis

Correlation Between the Three-Dimensional Maxillomandibular Complex Parameters and Pharyngeal Airway Dimensions in Different Sagittal and Vertical Malocclusions

Cone-beam Computed Tomography-based Three-Dimensional Cephalometric Analysis of Mandible Symmetry and the Occlusal Plane of Adult Patients with High-Angle Skeletal Class III Malocclusion and Jaw Deformity

Is the pattern of mandibular asymmetry in mild craniofacial microsomia comparable to non-syndromic class II asymmetry?

Difference in discrepancies of mandibular incisor compensation relative to Menton deviation between Class III roll- and yaw-dominant asymmetries

Retrospective analysis of the upper airway anatomy and Sella turcica morphology across different skeletal malocclusions: a computerized technique

Three-Dimensional Assessment of Upper Airway Volume and Morphology in Patients with Different Sagittal Skeletal Patterns

The Correlation Analysis Between Facial Asymmetry and the Compensation of Mandibular Morphology in Skeletal Class Ⅲ Patients

Cone-Beam Computed Tomography Assessment of Lower Facial Asymmetry in Unilateral Cleft Lip and Palate and Non-Cleft Patients with Class Iii Skeletal Relationship

THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN NASAL RESPIRATORY FUNCTION AND THE MORPHOLOGY OF CRANIOFACIAL AND UPPER AIRWAY IN DIFFERENT MANDIBLE SAGITTAL PATTERN POPULATION

Do patients with different craniofacial patterns have differences in upper airway volume? A systematic review with network meta-analysis

The Structural Characters of Craniofacial Skeleton in Patients with Mandibular Developmental Asymmetry

Correlation between the position of the glenoid fossa and condylar translational movement in skeletal Class III mandibular asymmetry patients

Nasal characteristics in patients with asymmetric mandibular prognathism

Archform Comparisons Between Skeletal Class Ii and Iii Malocclusions

Preliminary comparison of three-dimensional reconstructed palatal morphology in subjects with different sagittal and vertical patterns